It's not normal, no.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nicholas Warren
wrote:
> We've got a 100g qsfp in an mx204 that has 1207 bit errors and 29666
> errored blocks after 24 hours of just being linked up...
> I would assume this is not normal behavior, but I haven't used 100g
> before. Do others
ROA = Route Origin Authorization . Origin is the key word.
When you create an signed ROA and do all the publishing bits, RPKI
validator software will retrieve that , validate the signature, and pass
that up to routers, saying "This prefix range that originates from this ASN
is valid." Then, any BG
ected. Given that anyone can pick their own MAC addresses/spoof
MAC addresses, the fastest resolution to this mystery will likely be to
just ask.
Let us know what you find out! :)
--
Tom
Saudi Telecom ( AS 39386 ) is currently announcing Equinix NY9's IX prefix,
and Orange is gladly sharing that for the world to see.
Zayo : You might want to not be using that either when you're directly
connected to that exchange. :)
*Router:* New York, NY
*Command:* show route protocol bgp table
, Orange said they're not
passing it along anymore.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:04 PM Richard Porter
wrote:
> https://twitter.com/millionaire_xrp/status/1297952306357567488?s=10
>
> Related? reports of outages at Chase?
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:13 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
I was just reading the same thing JTK.
Of course this is followed by RFC8085 / BCP 145 , UDP Usage Guidelines :
5.1 Using UDP Ports
A UDP sender SHOULD NOT use a source port value of zero. A source
>port number that cannot be easily determined from the address or
>payload type provid
toreanderson/clatd
--
Tom
I am seeing some odd traffic deflections in the EU via 3356, but nothing in
the US so far.
Some scattershot oddball reports landing in our NOC, but nothing
conclusive.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:41 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> The CL portal loads for me, and I can log in, but it is slower than usual.
>
> They’re not reachable so who knows if they’re even working on it.
>
Gonna go out on a limb here and assume that a lot of phones were ringing
and people are in fact working on whatever it is. :)
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:34 AM David Hubbard
wrote:
> Same. Also, as reported on outages list,
>
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/analysis-of-todays-centurylink-level-3-outage/
I definitely found Mr. Prince's writing about yesterday's events
fascinating.
Verizon makes a mistake with BGP filters that allows a secondary mistake
from leaked "optimizer" routes to propagate, and Mr. Prince takes
>
> I've never heard a single positive word about them
>
There is rarely much in the way of emails/messages sent about things when
they work well.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:03 AM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> I've never heard a single positive word about them, and I've had my fair
> share of issues mys
t; close to implying that its Centurylink’s customers fault for not having
>> multiple paths to Cloudflare that don’t touch Centurylink a bit puzzling.
>> It could have just been poorly written.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NANOG *On
>> Behalf Of
that with which you otherwise could not.
It wouldn't be perfect, but options > no options.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:08 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:36 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully those customers learned the difference between redundancy an
Yeah. This actually would be a fascinating study to understand exactly what
happened. The volume of BGP messages flying around because of the session
churn must have been absolutely massive, especially in a complex internal
infrastructure like 3356 has.
I would say the scale of such an event has t
I completely agree that there is value for people sharing different
community structures that they have created for certain use cases. Such
things are generally useful for both operators of any experience level.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:08 AM wrote:
> Reg the BCP38 vs RFC I guess is point in ca
wouldn't have been as easy to
resolve without that - very few UK consumers were being assigned
addresses with .255 in them at the time.
--
Tom
On 14/09/2020 18:13, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them.
Aha! You're the reason they don't stop! :p
--
Tom
mething like that.
"smartly divided"... Did someone else prepare these words for you? ;)
--
Tom
On 16/09/2020 01:31, aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
> then, yes, I may have and didn't know it. Hey, was it you? LOL
Very unlikely. You may do well to peruse some of the objections to the
network-programming draft in the SPRING WG. There are many. :)
--
Tom
On 16/09/2020 11:18, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Quantum Fiber? Sounds like a misbranding. I highly doubt they are using
> Quantum technology.
Very prescient for when it becomes commercially possible though, eh? :)
--
Tom
r infer privacy.
One may prefer an alternate history, but you may find more success in
expelling that energy in pursuit of creating a better future.
See/also:
"broadband"
"software defined networks"
"the cloud"
--
Tom
On 21/09/2020 19:38, Randy Bush wrote:
> newspeak -- 1984
colloquialism
/kəˈləʊkwɪəlɪz(ə)m/
noun: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary and is used in
ordinary or familiar conversation.
--
Tom
Apple started moving traffic off 3rd party CDNs to their own CDN six years
ago. This is not a new development.
Also, I see no issues with an ARIN whois lookup for that prefix.
~ % whois 17.0.0.0/8
% IANA WHOIS server
% for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org
% This query returned
>
> Why stray away from how PC games were 20 years ago where there was a
> dedicated server and clients just spoke to servers?
Much cheaper to just let all the game clients talk peer to peer than it is
to maintain regional dedicated server infrastructure.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:35 AM Mike Ham
gt;
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Tom Beecher"
> *To: *"Mike Hammett"
> *Cc: *"Justin Wilson (Lists)" , "North Ameri
rs with all that implies.
>
> /Carlos
>
> On 28 Sep 2020, at 11:21, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> Why stray away from how PC games were 20 years ago where there was a
>> dedicated server and clients just spoke to servers?
>
>
> Much cheaper to just let all the g
is a long-winded, laborious, thankless task (well, mostly thankless)
and we should be writing software to do it for us. Of course, we all
know how bad everyone is at that, ergo it isn't often done.
On the other hand, perhaps these ISPs are worried that they might be
audited by an RIR?
--
Tom
This is the same state that spend $60M-ish to revamp their entire
unemployment system 6 years ago, only to have it completely collapse this
year when 'rona landed.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:19 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I understand that there is underlying work that can't be sourced somewhere
> el
>
> There are usually redundancies built-in when it comes to safety. i.e.
> what's the point of installing grounds on the upstream side if you have the
> switch open? If the lines are de-energized, why wear gloves? If you're
> doing all that, why carry an AED?
>
My uncle was a high tension line
>
> After "consideration of the
> affidavit" the court allowed "up to" $50 million to be frozen. Whatever the
> merits of the affidavit are, it indicates that the court looked at the
> facts,
> made a determination and based on that ordered the asset freeze.
>
There's an important distinction to b
It strikes me that ( without pointing at anyone in particular ) that
there's a bit of absolutism trending in this conversation.
It's possible for many things in this list to be true.
- It's possible that AFRINIC may have been following it's policies
accurately at the time of the initial allocatio
>
> AFRINIC has received clearance of enough money to cover their normal
> expenses
> for August and September. As such, there shouldn’t be any problems with
> salaries
> or “human cost” in those months. Hopefully given that reprieve, cooler
> heads at
> AFRINIC can prevail and some form of settlem
100% the Litter Robot is amazing. ( Except for my older cat, she's pushing
19, had to build a ramp for her. )
But I also agree there are limits to what needs IoTing. I don't live in a
house large enough that I can't go see if the box needs cleaning within
about 20s. I also sure as hell don't need
Televisions generally have a way smaller pixel density than a computer
monitor. It is very noticeable.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:27 PM wrote:
>
> Every time I've read a thread about using TVs for monitors several
> people who'd tried would say don't do it. I think the gist was that
> the image pr
o access to their money.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 3:40 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 1, 2021, at 04:21 , Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> AFRINIC has received clearance of enough money to cover their normal
>> expenses
>> for August and September. As such, there shouldn’t b
>
> If the generators are "emergency power", and you need to switch back to
> "utility power", obviously the way to do this must be the big red button,
> clearly marked as "EMERGENCY POWER OFF", no?!
>
The owner of my previous company did the same thing to us many years ago
because there was a sma
Jason-
I have a sidebar question here.
I came across the AQM paper you and others recently published. (
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.13968.pdf ) In that paper, the following is
stated :
When a customer purchases their own cable modem, they are responsible for
> administering it, updating the softw
imple as "why don't you peer???"
Regards,
--
Tom
Curious if there is a malicious angle after the 60 Minutes story last
night.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:26 PM Dmitry Sherman wrote:
> same problem in Israel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+dmitry=interhost@nanog.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
> *Sent:* Monday, 4 October 202
I see the same. Still see those prefixes via direct peering, but DFZ
doesn't have them. Their auths are not reachable even though I have routes
for them.
Some other weirdness I'm poking a bit on that doesn't seem like it could
possibly be related to FB DNS though.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:39 PM
They haven't completely dropped off, but the big subnets certainly have.
I'm only seeing 20-odd /24s from them via the DFZ, but everything larger
still directly.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:55 PM wrote:
> Looks bigger than DNS. Some people are saying they’ve disappeared off the
> DFZ.
>
>
>
> *Fro
>
> Maybe withdrawing those routes to their NS could have been mitigated by
> having NS in separate entities.
>
Assuming they had such a thing in place , it would not have helped.
Facebook stopped announcing the vast majority of their IP space to the DFZ
during this. So even they did have an offn
>
> My speculative guess would be that OOB access to a few outbound-facing
> routers per DC does not help much if a configuration error withdraws the
> infrastructure prefixes down to the rack level while dedicated OOB to
> each RSW would be prohibitive.
>
If your OOB has any dependence on the inb
>
> People keep repeating this but I don't think it's true.
>
My comment is solely sourced on my direct observations on my network, maybe
30-45 minutes in.
Everything except a few /24s disappeared from DFZ providers, but I still
heard those prefixes from direct peerings. There was no disaggregati
By what they have said publicly, the initial trigger point was that all of
their datacenters were disconnected from their internal backbone, thus
unreachable.
Once that occurs, nothing else really matters. Even if the external
announcements were not withdrawn, and the edge DNS servers could provid
doesn't.
I'm sure they'll learn from this and in the future have some better
things in place to account for such a scenario.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 12:21 PM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Tom Beecher writes:
>
> > Even if the external
> > announcements were not withdraw
>
> But, the reality is that it is impossible to correctly
> recognize server is unavailable or to correctly withdraw
> routes only when server is unavailable.
>
Not true at all.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:50 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> William Herrin wrote:
>
> >
>
> In facebook case, it was combined with poor understanding
> on short/long expiration period to cause the disaster.
>
Still, no.
The CAUSE of the outage was all of the FB datacenters being completely
disconnected from their backbone, and thus the internet. DNS breaking was a
direct RESULT of t
Yeah.. I mean people couldn't get stuck in the DoomScroll, so they chose to
do something else. I'm sure plenty of people did something besides Netflix.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:35 AM Steven Bakker via NANOG
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 16:18 +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Could Net
>
> Which they probably will, but it won't be labeled as dangerous or
> leading to immediate mental harm.
>
There is already lots of published research on social media addiction that
does call it out just that strongly.
There is a reason why that company has started going to great lengths in
rece
appen in the world that make me really wonder. I'm sure my therapist is
sick of hearing about it by now. :p
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:40 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/21 17:26, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> > There is already lots of published research on social media addicti
>
> I think it would be absolutely *stunning* for content providers
> to turn the model on its head; use a bittorrent like model for
> caching and serving content out of subscribers homes at
> recalcitrant ISPs, so that data doesn't come from outside,
> it comes out of the mesh within the eyeball n
t from the MPAA/RIAA/etc because there
is a torrent stream emanating from their connection, and I have little
faith that any provider would go out of their way to jump in front and say
'no no, that's our tech'.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:15 PM Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> For network neutrality, backbone providers *MUST* be neutral
> for contents they carry.
>
> However, CDN providers having their own backbone are using
> their backbone for contents they prefer, which is *NOT*
> neutral at all.
>
> As such, access/retail providers may pay for peering with
> neut
rectly with the end user's ISP. Where is anything related to
neutrality being 'violated', regardless of which path I choose to send the
bits out?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:36 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> >
>
> Otherwise, CDN providers with their own backbone are free riders
> ignoring access costs.
>
I think the Pointy Hairs and Bean Counters would love it if they could
ignore all the monthly bills for the access costs that we generate.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:46 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830
>
> Vs. an ISP that is causing the problem or trying to run a protection
> racket against content providers, I think it wouldn’t be hard for the
> content
> provider to supply appropriate messaging inserted at the front end of
> playback to explain the situation to their mutual customers. Instead o
ing in my head that said Extreme had one. Was it the X450-G2?
--
Tom
On 20/10/2021 16:50, Tom Hill wrote:
> On 19/10/2021 14:50, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> It's a lower bandwidth Trident2+ with some different I/O options iirc.
>> Same featureset, but a mix of 10G and 25G serdes, targeted at like
>> 48x10g+4x100G boxes.
>
> That was my
GNAT state table.
... And that's before they call you, as Tim also rightly points out.
--
Tom
It sounds like you want something like this:
https://github.com/facebookarchive/fbtracert
We have an internal tool that works on generally similar principles, works
pretty well.
( I have no relationship with Facebook; I just always remember their presos
on UDPinger and FBTracert from my first NA
Yeah, some additional specifics about this would be helpful.
I see no new charges on my nat gas gas bills in my state (NY) going back 4
months that I still had laying around.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:32 AM Haudy Kazemi via NANOG
wrote:
> Yet, in spite of claims of TX being an island, customer
>
> It may help IPv6 deployment if more V4 addresses are eventually
> released and allocated
>
No, it won't.
The biggest impediment to IPv6 adoption is that too many people invest too
much time and resources in finding ways to squeeze more blood from the IPv4
stone.
If tomorrow, RFCs were change
My assumption was that he meant GAA.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:48 PM Shane Ronan wrote:
> What do you mean 3rd Tier?
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/30/21 11:38 AM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>>
>> The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi,
>
> In my view there is no practical difference. The owner has full control of
> his warehouse and it would be very illegal for any outside party to install
> any device at all including unauthorised wifi devices.
>
Nothing illegal about someone sitting in a parking lot next door with a
pineapple
es are much more likely to investigate and take
action against intentional interference in these frequency ranges than they
would be in the unlicensed wifi bands.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:44 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
> tir. 30. nov. 2021 23.19 skrev Tom Beecher :
>
>> In my view
>
> This should give a good overview:
>
> https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/128950142/COMST2661384.pdf
>
> It is in fact quite interesting.
>
Thanks for sharing that. Excellent read, really interesting stuff.
Couple quick takeaways:
- The design is clearly well thought out to account for the
>
> To come back on Private 5G networks. Can a private 5G network protect
> against spyware like Pegazus?
>
No disrespect intended here, but you are essentially asking if going from
2.4GHz Wifi to 5GHz wifi will make things more secure. I'm sure you know
the answer to that.
Private 5G is just a
Hi NANOG'ers,
Reaching out for help - having troubles with email delivery into O365
inboxes. Have done the requisite PTRs, SPF+DKIM work, domain reputation,
RBL checks, etc.
For some reason, this one is vexxing me. Anyone from Microsoft on the list
that could lend a helping hand?
Thanks
That sounds remarkably sensible given that the AWS customer base will be
dipping their toes into the world of IPv6 very cautiously.
(No good for a honeypot, but we have many other means for that.)
--
Tom
those whom Jay refers to, had fewer addresses to buy & sell -
definitely not more.
There are ~4.3B addresses in the entire 32-bit IPv4 space, and there are
~4.3B /64s in every IPv6 /32.
The D/E IPv4 space would make speculators rich, nothing else of note.
--
Tom
Altimeter Band : 4.2Ghz - 4.4Ghz
VZ and AT&T agreed (long ago) to reduce power and stay inside 3.7Ghz -
3.98Ghz once the full deployment was done, staying 200MHz away from
altimeters.
In Japan, they have been running 5G for over a year now up to 4,1Ghz, and
restarting again at 4.5Ghz. Only 100MHz
d off.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:13 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Altimeter Band : 4.2Ghz - 4.4Ghz
>
> VZ and AT&T agreed (long ago) to reduce power and stay inside 3.7Ghz -
> 3.98Ghz once the full deployment was done, staying 200MHz away from
> altimeters.
>
> In Japan, t
> Jay, one thing you’re missing is that a maximum of 2 (and almost always
1) radar altimeter will be in use per airfield, as one aircraft will be
landing at a time.
I believe that Lady Benjamin may have conflated the radar altimeter on
aircraft with the instrument landing system transmitters.
On
This seems like Rube Goldberg Machine levels of complexity and overhead to
try and solve for forged-origin , when good best practices already makes
the risk of that almost negligible.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:22 PM Yixin Sun
wrote:
> Dear Nanog,
>
> We appreciate that your time is very preciou
>
> For some folk, the risk of money cost outweighs the risk of loss of
> direct operational control.
>
Those folks also tend to learn hard lessons about what happens when the
Magic Cloud provider fails in a way that isn't possible to anticipate
because it's all black box.
Saving 12 months of ope
>
> I do disagree, if I understood the argument right. If the argument is
> 'cloud makes no business sense to anyone'.
>
That wasn't the argument I intended to make, but I see how it could have
been interpreted that way.
There are absolutely a ton of use cases where cloud usage makes absolute
sen
>
> Are there any authoritative resources from said organizations saying you
> shouldn't use their servers for your persistent ping destinations?
I'm not sure that an ' authoritative resource ' is really needed. It should
be generally understood at this point in the internet's life that networks
>
> Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware
> routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let
> the world ping the brains out of it?
>
Seems like a lot of overhead for zero benefit.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:11 PM Lady Benjamin Cannon of
njamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
> 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
> CEO
> b...@6by7.net
> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company
> in the world.”
> ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME
> <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7network
>
> I'm not going to opinion on the quantity of benefits, but this thought
> could lend a razor from Occam.
>
I always enjoy a good shave from ol' Occam,no worries.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:54 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 22:19, Tom Beecher wrot
e only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company
> in the world.”
> ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME
> <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks>
>
> FCC License KJ6FJJ
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2022, at 12:15 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> Side note,
>
> (your license runs out, the box is a paper-weight)
Should be a hard no for anyone purchasing network equipment anyways, but
people have reasons I guess.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:19 PM Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
> Meraki MX series?
>
>
>
> I don't like the way they do their licensing (your l
earn from our prior mistakes.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:29 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 2/10/22 20:27, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> >
> > I guess it depends on what the actual problem trying to be solved is.
> >
> > If I understand it correctly, the OG issue was s
>
> Can you provide examples?
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twe6uTwOyJo&ab_channel=NANOG
Our good friend Jared could only get 1.5M DSL living just outside Ann
Arbor, MI, so he had to start his own CLEC.
I have friends in significantly more rural areas than he lives in ( Niagara
and Orleans c
#x27;s different. :)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:51 AM james.cut...@consultant.com <
james.cut...@consultant.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2022, at 8:33 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>
> The prediciate assumption that "pinging one destination is a valid check
> that my internet works
I think this goes back to 2016. This explains it better than I could.
https://publicknowledge.org/the-fccs-plan-to-gut-tech-transitions-rules-is-bad-for-consumers-small-businesses-and-competition/
Essentially Mr.Pai didn't change the rules, he pushed through the order
( FCC-16-90 ) that redefined
I've seen an uptick, but nothing too dramatic. Maybe 4-5 junk calls a day
- mostly afternoon.
-- Tom
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:57 AM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Mine exploded since the requirement date. Some mornings I get a dozen
> before lunch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33
las, still only one choice.
-- Tom
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Mike Lyon wrote:
> If they allow antennas on the roof, we can service them :)
>
> Your house, on the other hand, we already lucked out on that one!
>
> -Mike Lyon
> Ridge Wireless
>
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 16:48
on call waiting. :/
>
> Moral of the story?
>
> If you retire and join AARP, put your most hated
> enemy's phone number down instead of yours. :(
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:28 PM Tom Mitchell
> wrote:
>
>> I've seen an uptick,
>
> Would it improve Internet health to refuse Russian ASN announcements?
>
This should never be a proposed solution.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:42 PM William Allen Simpson <
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There have been reports of DDoS and new targeted malware attacks.
>
> There were
>
> Starlink however forgets that Russia does have anti satellite weapons and
> they probably will not hesitate to use them which will make low earth orbit
> a very dangerous place when Russia starts blowing up the Starlink birds.
> I applaud the humanitarian aspect of providing Starlink service,
>
>
> So they’re going to offer the service to anyone in a denied area for free
> somehow? How do you send someone a bill or how do they pay it if you can’t
> do business in the country?
>
There is a difference between a country allowing SpaceX to install a ground
station in their territory, and pro
>
> With the sanctions in place, how would Cogent get paid for providing
> service?
>
As has been said previously, taking preemptive actions based on what MAY or
MAY NOT occur is a slippery slope to be on.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:47 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 1:15 PM B
>
> However, it could also be that given the quick rise in cyber warfare that
> they do not want to be caught in the crossfire and carrying and dealing
> with the loads of DDOS and pure hacking attempts going in both directions.
> The burden of dealing with this as well as payment issues and maybe
I recall reading the IETF draft some time ago. It seemed like an overly
convoluted mechanism to tunnel 240/4.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:50 AM Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
> Dear Colleagues:
>
> 0)I was made aware of a recent discussion on this Forum that cited our
> work on the 240/4 NetBlock, nick
>
> Is it not past time we admit that we have no real idea what the
> schedule or level of effort will be for making IPv6 ubiquitous? This
> year it was more than last year and next year it'll probably be more
> than this year. The more precise predictions all seem to have fallen
> flat.
>
The onl
Don't need to break phone to tower encryption when the vast majority of the
call pathway is not encrypted.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi, I was reading an article on why Russia hasn't taken out Ukraine's
> mobile networks and one of the premises was that they could
>
> It doesn't take any OS upgrades for "getting everything to work on
> IPv6". All the OS's and routers have supported IPv6 for more than a
> decade.
>
There are lots of vendors, both inside and outside the networking space,
that have consistently released products with non-existant or broken IP
On 09/03/2022 00:25, Tom Beecher wrote:
The only way IPv6 will ever be ubiquitous is if there comes a time where
there is some forcing event that requires it to be.
In about two years time, IPv4 addresses will be worth on the order of
$100/IP, assuming current trends hold.
That's a l
201 - 300 of 1187 matches
Mail list logo
