> > Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware > routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let > the world ping the brains out of it? >
Seems like a lot of overhead for zero benefit. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:11 PM Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe <l...@6by7.net> wrote: > ok that’s amazing. > > RFC1149 amazing. > > > Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware > routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let > the world ping the brains out of it? > > Who owns 69.69.69.69 - collab? > > How naff is this? > > -LB > > Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE > 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC > CEO > b...@6by7.net > "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company > in the world.” > ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME > <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks> > > FCC License KJ6FJJ > > > > On Feb 9, 2022, at 9:38 AM, Jay Hennigan <j...@west.net> wrote: > > On 2/8/22 23:42, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > The only problem is the less friendly IP address (although this will > be less and less a problem with IPv6, since 2001:4860:4860::8888 is > not really friendly). > > > Fun fact: Someone at Sprint had the same hobby as I did in the early > 1970s. Their website resolves to 2600:: which I think is rather friendly. > :-) > > Please don't use it for an IPv6 ping target, thanks. > > -- > Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net > Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 > 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV > > >
