Maybe. Would be for someone at Zayo to comment on. Looks like 39386 has been ( and still is ) announcing the NY9 prefix since early June. ( Fix your filters, please. )
Not sure if Zayo is having an issue by which they would have started using the route via ST all of a sudden. In any event, Orange said they're not passing it along anymore. On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:04 PM Richard Porter <rich...@pedantictheory.com> wrote: > https://twitter.com/millionaire_xrp/status/1297952306357567488?s=10 > > Related? reports of outages at Chase? > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:13 PM Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote: > >> Saudi Telecom ( AS 39386 ) is currently announcing Equinix NY9's IX >> prefix, and Orange is gladly sharing that for the world to see. >> >> Zayo : You might want to not be using that either when you're directly >> connected to that exchange. :) >> >> *Router:* New York, NY >> *Command:* show route protocol bgp table inet.0 198.32.118.0/24 terse >> exact >> >> >> inet.0: 833301 destinations, 5821043 routes (833250 active, 16 holddown, 88 >> hidden) >> + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both >> A V Destination P Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hop AS path >> * ? 198.32.118.0/24 B 170 100 4294967294 5511 >> 39386 39386 39386 39386 I >> unverified >64.125.29.222 >> 64.125.29.220 >> ? B 170 100 4294967294 5511 >> 39386 39386 39386 39386 I >> unverified >64.125.29.222 >> 64.125.29.220 >> ? B 170 100 4294967294 5511 >> 39386 39386 39386 39386 I >> unverified >64.125.29.220 >> 64.125.29.222 >> ? B 170 100 4294967294 5511 >> 39386 39386 39386 39386 I >> unverified >64.125.29.220 >> 64.125.29.222 >> ? B 170 100 4294967294 5511 >> 39386 39386 39386 39386 I >> unverified >64.125.29.220 >> 64.125.29.222 >> {master} >> >>
