I think this goes back to 2016. This explains it better than I could. https://publicknowledge.org/the-fccs-plan-to-gut-tech-transitions-rules-is-bad-for-consumers-small-businesses-and-competition/
Essentially Mr.Pai didn't change the rules, he pushed through the order ( FCC-16-90 ) that redefined what things meant so that the rules became toothless. On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:44 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitch...@isipp.com> wrote: > > > > I had the same thought and dug into it. I traced the email chain > backwards as well as the office phone. The email (and named employee) are > legit as well as the switch serving the office line. Everything adds up. I > don't have a reason to believe it's a scam. They also noted they will > abandon existing infra in place. Good observation. Thanks! > > The way they are going about it, and the fact that they are > misrepresenting the FCC's rules, and that the tenants are left holding the > mess, is the scam. > > Anne > > -- > Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law > CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing > law) > Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook > Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School > Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School > Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute > In-house Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) (Closed in 2004) > >
