Looking for the contact to update incorrect azure geolocation data. Thanks
I would like to know as well who best to reach out to. We are experiencing
ipv6 related issues with AWS, unable to load even amazon.com completely
when any of our customers have ipv6 connectivity
curl -vvv
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/11EIQ5IGqaL._RC%7C01ZTHTZObnL.css
* Tryin
Our eyeball customers all of a sudden can no longer reach their CBS all
access content. Inspection of the network connections now show a 403 error
when trying to post to https://cbsi.live.ott.irdeto.com/widevine/getlicense
code: 100214
message: "The request originated from ip address 196.53.97.0 w
On our network(which isn't docsis, granted) we use PPPoE for all static IP
addresses, because it allows /32 ip address allocations for all home CPE
routers, upstream, the routers handle routing via ospf to change the path
of where that /32 public IP goes. It allows "zero touch" moving of a
customer
Trying to find a NOC contact for idrive.com . Whois of the URL doesn't show
any owner, whois of the IP for the site(not service) just shows centurylink
Customers from a major subnet of ours cannot utilise the service.
Our customers are trying to access uhauldealer.com and are unable to load
the page. Classic case of incorrect geolocation and/or up filtering.
Our emails to their webmaster/wan team have gone unanswered or bounced
If anyone knows how to contact them please contact me off list
uting has to do with this
> at all. Your message seems to go back and forth between being application
> level and network level, so I think clearing up exactly the symptoms of
> your issues would be helpful.
>
> -Neil
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 20:32, Michael Crapse wrote:
>>
>
to go back and forth between being application
> level and network level, so I think clearing up exactly the symptoms of
> your issues would be helpful.
>
>
> -Neil
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 20:32, Michael Crapse wrote:
>>
>> Our customers are trying to ac
s it a firewall blocking
> you or is there a route missing somewhere (this seems unlikely).
>
> Hopefully there's someone on list that can help.. Otherwise I think
> wan@uhaul is your best option.
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 20:59, Michael Crapse wrote:
>>
>> The server does
They have some improper geolocation for us, would be nice to have them
input to this chain.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:00 PM Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +, Justin Krejci wrote:
> >
> > As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and
> > manageable
Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about
disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. Does anyone have any idea, or who to
contact regarding this issue?
This is most likely improper geolocation databases. Anyone have an idea who
they use?
Mike
ror code, IP address, and zip code.. we'll see
> if it's passed to the right folks.
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:30 PM Michael Crapse
> wrote:
>
>> Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about
>> disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. D
wrote:
> Try netad...@disneystreaming.com. Was on their whois.
>
> --
> *Aden Dragulescu*
> fiberdrop, LLC
> a...@fiberdrop.net
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:27 PM Michael Crapse
> wrote:
>
>> There has been a continued flurry of trouble tickets fr
IPv6 is a lot more granular when it comes to geolocation data. It is also
very very unlikely that the block has been used before, and you never know
what the previous owner did or what geolocation/VPN blacklists it was added
to. Let me put it this way, this is a familiar song and dance for us, and
For all those in the current and future thread. We were successful in
reaching to Disney by emailing them with our subnet
netad...@disneystreaming.com
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 08:26, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> On 11/13/19 9:49 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> > It’s not about optimization, it’s about the co
Well, if the US government spies on everyone using exported cisco hardware,
why wouldn't the PRC do the same?
On 20 April 2018 at 08:59, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Thanks Colton, Since I live in the US, and work for a boss that’s nervous
> (concerned) about those things, then I comply. I remember men
Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane
electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best
providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may
have one of the most critical infrastructures, and should be a "part-owner"
of the internet
Our eyeball network is consistently having some streaming issues(buffering)
with DirecTV now. Our main recourse is to sell them on youtube TV and
netflix. fixes the issue, no more complaints from our customers. Issues
mainly occur during peak times and even on 300+mbps low latency/jitter
customers.
Not just horse trading, but underhanded businesses practices where a well
known "grey services" or vpn provider will rent out their IPv4s at low low
cost to force new/small ISPs into taking these IPv4s, cleaning them
up(deblacklisting and deVPN block), and releasing them back to the services
to eff
For an eyeball network, you cannot count on an IPv6 only network. Because
all of your "customers" will complain because they can't get to hulu, or
any other ipv4 only eyeball service. You still need the ipv4s to operate a
proper network, and good luck figuring out which services are blacklisting
yo
?
Someone made a statement that getting more ipv6 would solve OP's problem of
finding more clean ipv4 space
On 11 June 2018 at 10:50, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Michael Crapse
> wrote:
>
>> For an eyeball network, you cannot count on an IPv6 only netwo
I agree, i hope that this is for testing/testbench purposes only, or only
running iBGP, as no one in the world would like for you to be running a
public BGP through a docker instance.
On 14 June 2018 at 13:00, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
>> I am working on
I've always said that the fiber middle mile price themselves out of more
money. I want a fiber connection that will service a subdivision(20-50
households) with speeds up to 1gbps, oh that's $2k/mo. The problem is that
we want a fiber connection for 10 or 20 subdivisions, oh, that's 2k per,
but you
Microwave radios are the things that break the mold of the incorrect
assumption that just because it doesn't make sense to put up more wires to
a house you can't have more than one provider. Considering that we've
deployed a few wireless systems with less latency, jitter, and downtime
than the loca
Could I get an off list reply from blizzard engineers. Your email system is
blocking our emails as spam, and I'm trying to resolve some geolocation
issues that disallow our mutual customers to access your services. Thank you
Michael Crapse
Wi-Fiber, Inc.
What if... Bear with me for a moment here, we don't try to force VoD onto a
multicast setup? Multicast is used extensively by all major ISPs(if they
have the rights) to deliver IPTV. One issue you brought up is people
unwillin to wait 1 or 5 mins for a show, well before the days of youtube
people w
Cragslist is blocking our largest IP block, if someone from CL could
contact me off list, that would be great.
anyone know who to contact at fubo.tv? Getting an improper geoblock for our
location
"Where does that leave the little guy with CGN?
Right here. Screaming into the avoid begging for help. Some special
exception. "
As a group that you'd consider a "little" guy, we've always ran full dual
stack ipv4/ipv6. The issue is being dual stack literally takes twice as
long to configure everyt
maxmind and the other geolocation databases have the biggest effect. if
updating that doesn't fix your problem. geosupp...@netflix.com can get you
squared away
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 9:08 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> It seems like recently one of the sources for IP info that Netflix and
> Hulu uses wa
Or he's saying that cogent has the biggest network of compromised users.
Usually ipv4 only eyeball networks tend to have the most bots on net.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 19:22, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * aar...@gvtc.com (Aaron1) [Wed 17 Oct 2018, 00:17 CEST]:
> >However Cogent seems to be the dirtiest
Tmobile, and syringa no youtube
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 19:42, Kenneth McRae via NANOG
wrote:
> Is this widespread?
>
Hoping to see if an network engineer from fitbit is on list. Our customers
are having trouble logging into your app on our network. Perhaps an IP
filtering/routing issue.
Thanks
I am a local WISP. And my customers have trouble reaching Hulu, Disney now,
and previously netflix and amazon prime(both resolved).
I have emailed, mailed, and called both HULU and Disney now to get my
196.53.96.0/22 subnet unblacklisted as a VPN provider(no longer so) from
their services. They hav
+1 for Nat64. dual stack is just keeping ipv4 around longer than it needs
to be
On 19 December 2017 at 18:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 2017, at 07:39 , Livingood, Jason <
> jason_living...@comcast.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/18/17, 2:36 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Harald Koch" <
> nanog-bou
gt; Thank you,
> > Brett A Mansfield
> >
> > On 2017-12-15 19:57, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > > Bump for Hulu.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > Mike Hammett
> > > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > >
> > > Midwest In
to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Michael
> >Crapse
> >Sent: Tuesday, 26 December, 2017 12:42
> >To: Sam Norri
Yes, let's talk about waste, Lets waste 2^64 addresses for a ptp.
If that was ipv4 you could recreate the entire internet with that many
addresses.
On 28 December 2017 at 10:39, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On Dec 28, 2017, at 09:23 , Octavio Alvarez
> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/20/2017 12:23 PM, Mike wr
As a small local ISP, our upstream isn't willing to give us more than a
/48, their statement "Here's a /48 that will give you unlimited addresses
that you'll never run out of". Therefore we give businesses /60s and
residentials /64. If only we could do as suggested here and give everyone a
/48, hah
The lightbulb in this scenario has a severe security issue, and thus allows
total control of any windows computer on the network because it's set to a
private/trusted network. Also note, the lightbulb is publicly addressable
and has a 8MHz processor incapable of firewalling itself..
On 28 December
And if a medical breakthrough happens within the next 30 years? Nanobots
that process insulin for the diabetic, or take care of cancer, or repair
your cells so you don't age, or whatever, perhaps the inventor things ipv6
is a good idea for such an endeavour. a nanobot is microns wide, and there
wil
I've never dealt with a support queue that resolved the issue faster than a
direct contact.
On 4 January 2018 at 09:12, wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:33:51 -0500, William Herrin said:
>
> > Why anyone thinks it's acceptable for the form submission to vanish in to
> > the faceless support queue
No telecom power unfortunately
On 5 January 2018 at 11:50, Bryan Holloway wrote:
> Fiberstore is rolling out some CRAZY cheap 100Gbps switches, and I'm
> curious if anyone in the community has any thoughts or real-life world
> experience with them.
>
> E.g.: https://www.fs.com/products/69340.ht
geolocat...@netflix.com
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018, 7:41 AM John Lightfoot wrote:
> If your IP range includes an ipv6 tunnel, Netflix blocks it thinking it's
> a vpn. You need to block the ipv6 routes to Netflix and force it to fall
> back to ipv4.
>
> On 1/6/18, 2:19 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Gary E.
I have a customer on a ps3, and he can't seem to connect to the psn. Keeps
getting the 80710016 error. If there is anyone that can help me
troubleshoot this issue, that would be great.
DMZed his console, issue persists. I have given his router 3
different public IPs to no avail.
This(ps3) was working yesterday on hughesnet, until we did our installation.
On 7 January 2018 at 16:58, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
> On 01/07/2018 04:12 PM, Michael Crapse wrote:
>
>> I hav
The definition of an ASIC is that it has only one use. Just because half of
a 100gb switch is not in use doesn't mean that you can mine bitcoin, or run
a blockchain with the asics not in use..
On 9 January 2018 at 08:49, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG
wrote:
> BTC miners use asics. Big switches/ro
forwarding capacity needs just 100 or so mpps capacity. Routers that
forward at that rate are found for less than $2k.
On 18 January 2018 at 23:31, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 18 janvier 2018 22:06 -0700, Michael Crapse :
>
> > Why though? If i could get the major CDNs all inside my n
We got ours from logicweb, but all the IPs originated from AfriNIC and were
blacklisted in several different places.
On 19 January 2018 at 14:57, Ryan Gard wrote:
> We're on the hunt yet again for an additional /22 to lease, and are
> wondering what the best options are out there?
>
> Our usual
Has Hulu, or a thousand other content distributors considered IPv6? Because
you can't even tunnel to ipv4 without setting off VPN alarms with HULU.
On 19 January 2018 at 18:38, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:59 PM Ryan Gard wrote:
>
> > We're on the hunt yet again for an addi
t;
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Mike Hammett
> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >> Midwest-IX
> >> http://www.midwest-ix.com
> >>
> >> - Original Messa
Tier 1 just means they don't pay for ip transit themselves, only Peering.
Doesn't mean that it's good transit.
Best provider i've ever used is hurricane electric, actually a tier 2
provider, but bigger/better than many tier 1s.
On 22 January 2018 at 19:07, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> On 22/01
7:57 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael Crapse
>> Date: Monday, January 22, 2018 at 5:27 PM
>> To: Mark Andrews
>> Cc: Lee Howard , NANOG list
>> Subject: Re: Leasing /22
>>
>> > Customers on ps4s and xboxes will hate y
For number 2, I'm a fan of what mike suggests. I believe the technical term
is MAP-T.
For number 1, anyone who wants one, gets one. We provide free public static
IP to any customer who asks for one. Another solution, using above solution
is to ask them which ports they need, and forward those to th
Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their
examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service.
On 28 March 2018 at 12:14, Payam Poursaied wrote:
> dig google.com @1.1.1.1
>
>
>
> Cloudflare?
>
> Didn't find any news around it
>
>
Along these same lines, we have a service that captures all DNS requests
regardless the server(only non-TLS, albeit), that people pay $9.99/mo for,
so they definitely want this.. We just NAT all requests to Open DNS servers
to provide internet filtering as a service. It would be arbitrarily trivial
56 matches
Mail list logo
