The lightbulb in this scenario has a severe security issue, and thus allows total control of any windows computer on the network because it's set to a private/trusted network. Also note, the lightbulb is publicly addressable and has a 8MHz processor incapable of firewalling itself..
On 28 December 2017 at 20:41, Chuck Church <chuckchu...@gmail.com> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ricky Beam > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:55 PM > To: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> > Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too > > >Every scenario everyone has come up with is "unlikely". Home networks > with multiple LANs??? Never going to happen; people don't know how to set > them up, and there's little technical need for it. > > I couldn't agree more. We're spending so much time with new RFCs to > handle all these prefix delegation ways in order to accommodate 'power > users' who are used to chaining one NATing IPv4 router off of another one > and having it sort of work. If we'd just put a stake in the ground and say > residences can have one router and bridge everything below that we'd be > further ahead. I just can't see 99.999% of users being interested in > subnetting their homes and writing firewall rules so their light bulbs > can't talking to their DVRs. > > Chuck > >
