Darn it, I thought IPv6 managed all that kind of stuff automatically ?
You mean I still have to do some work?
;-)
--
Leigh
-Original Message-
From: chip [mailto:chip.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 November 2010 17:23
To: nanog
Subject: IPv6 Space Management. Tracking, not Allocating
There'
, but did anybody suggest just using IPv6
for this?
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
And that will teach me not to read the thread!
--
Leigh
From: Tom Hill [t...@ninjabadger.net]
Sent: 16 June 2011 13:46
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:30 +, Leigh Porter
Does not out of the box mean that there is an LACP 'fix' ?
--
Leigh Porter
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:45, "Josh Smith" wrote:
> ESX does NOT support LACP out of the box. Not sure about the nexus 1kv.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Josh Smith
> KD8HRX
> email/jabber:
Indeed, we had similar issues on a 3G radio network. Long RTTs made it
impossible to reach the maximum potential throughput of the network. I
installed one of these:
http://www.fastsoft.com/home/
And the problem just went away.
--
Leigh Porter
> -Original Message-
> From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ott [mailto:andr...@naund.org]
> Sent: 28 June 2011 16:27
> To: Eugen Leitl; williamejs...@googlemail.com
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Strange TCP connection behavior 2.0 RC2
> (+3)
>
> -andreas
> [who has to explain this about on
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 June 2011 16:53
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: Andreas Ott; Eugen Leitl; williamejs...@googlemail.com; NANOG list
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Strange TCP connection behavior 2.0 RC2
> (
on scheduler, but the
results kind of spoke for themselves really.
Similarly we have had good results with WiMAX networks.
--
Leigh Porter
UK Broadband
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
I use JuNOS Juniper for just this and it works well. However, I have not used
the GUI for configuring it, but the command line is very usable.
However, if you have a NOC Monkey, I would be tempted to create your own front
end for configuring stuff and have an XML interface to the real boxes..
--
Leigh Porter
On 2 Jul 2011, at 14:47, "Frank Bulk" wrote:
> IPv6 access to TW Telecom's website, www.twtelecom.com, has been down almost
> continuously since Wednesday evening. For dual-stacked users browsing their
> site but not using Google Chrome this can
On 14/07/2011 9:08 a.m., Larry Stites wrote:
> Given what you know now, if you were 21 and just starting into networking /
> communications industry which areas of study or specialty would you
> prioritize?
>
Rebeccah Harris in my physics lectures. She was clearly up for it.
--
Leigh
AND the DSL going down at the same time is
minimal, especially as the DSL is copper to a local exchange.
--
Leigh Porter
From: Jeff Kell [jeff-k...@utc.edu]
Sent: 26 July 2011 16:00
To: nanog
Subject: Re: OOB
On 7/26/2011 10:19 AM, Jensen Tyler wrote
I just wish spammingtree was on by default.
--
Leigh Porter
On 10 Aug 2011, at 22:47, "Jason Biel" wrote:
> Is it to the point where I can just forward the emails from help desk to
> NANOG so I don't have to answer them?
>
> Biel
>
> On Wed, Aug 10,
purely practical.
I took on some ideas for backup though, so I am sorting out a backblaze account
and using Randy's fantastic sync thing that he mentioned. I really do not want
18 months of research to vanish.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2011 08:37
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: How long is your rack?
>
> > I really do not want 18 months of research to vani
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:os10ru...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2011 11:57
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: Bryan Irvine; Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX); nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: How long is your rack?
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2011, at
employ. But really, if they
get OSPF then IS-IS is not hard to grasp.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
ations that have active AAAA records
to break peoples connectivity to their resources.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
Why not use wireless for it all if the bandwidth is enough. 5.8ghz kit is
pretty cheap and fast.
--
Leigh Porter
On 20 Aug 2011, at 04:16, "Frank Bulk" wrote:
> You can order custom-made patch cables that are outdoor rated from any
> decent company that sells fiber patch cab
gest in VA in well over a century. Think
> of the _trillions_ of dollars which could have been put into
> healthcare, public safety, hell, better networking equipment :) we
> could have used instead of making all buildings
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
> Sent: 31 August 2011 14:34
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: PuTTY alt-keys (was Re: 16-User Network)
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Joe Hamelin"
>
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Jay R Ashworth
> > wrote
be horribly anti-pola to the
> affected customers, like white hot wires. and one just does not do
> that
> to customers.
>
> randy
Presumably you can change that behaviour with communities?
--
Leigh Porter
__
Th
sues.
A+P would be nicer perhaps, but none of the CPE I have will support it. I'll
try and give people who do NAT in their CPE a public address for as long as I
can, but it'll soon run out and then NAT444 will have to b
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 11:18
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> > I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Roesen [mailto:d...@cluenet.de]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 17:38
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now.
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@dds.nl]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 20:26
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> I think you have the numbers off, he started with 1000 users sharing
> the same IP, since you can only do 62k sessions or so and with a
> "normal" tim
> -Original Message-
> From: David Israel [mailto:da...@otd.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 21:23
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> On 9/7/2011 3:24 PM, Seth Mos wrote:
> > I think you have the numbers off, he started with 1000 users sharing
> the same IP, since you can
> -Original Message-
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 23:14
> To: Dorn Hetzel
> Cc: Leigh Porter; NANOG
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:13:26 EDT, Dorn Hetzel said:
>
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: 08 September 2011 01:22
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: Seth Mos; NANOG
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
> > Considering that offices, schools etc regularly have far more than 10
> users p
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@dds.nl]
> Sent: 08 September 2011 06:43
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
>
>
> Op 8 sep 2011, om 07:26 heeft Geoff Huston het volgende geschreven:
>
> >
> > On 08/09/2011, at 2:41 AM,
k, it's probably high time for letting the thing die :-)
>
> Warm regards
>
> Carlos
You could say the same thing about NAT44 from the very start!
IPv4 just needs to die sooner rather than later. For now though, there is a
good many
Nar it's ok, it'll pass the UK and it'll all be fine, just like the other time..
--
Leigh Porter
On 10 Sep 2011, at 14:57, "andrew.wallace"
wrote:
> I'm hearing on the news wire 80mph winds will come to UK over
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com]
> Ip mobility via gtp or mobile ip generally does not work when you nat
> at the
> 'edge'. If you don't want your ip address to change every time you
> change
> cell sites, the nat has to be centralized.
>
> Cb
Inde
when they ask for dodgy certs so they can
intercept something..
No, as soon as you have somebody who is not yourself in control without any
third party verifiably independent oversight then you have to carefully define
what you mean by
> -Original Message-
> From: Always Learning [mailto:na...@u61.u22.net]
> Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39
> To: N. Max Pierson
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ouch..
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>
> > Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going t
-services/routing/mx-series/mx960/#modules
--
Leigh
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul [mailto:p...@paulgraydon.co.uk]
> Sent: 14 September 2011 16:48
> To: James Jones; Leigh Porter
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Always Learning
> Subject: Re: ouch..
>
> http://
I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6.
--
Leigh Porter
On 15 Sep 2011, at 00:37, "Mark Gauvin" wrote:
> Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I
> would still be able to make a living as a micro soft netw
That will either be because you exceeded your port count or the RTSP ALG is
broken.
--
Leigh Porter
On 15 Sep 2011, at 07:48, "valdis.kletni...@vt.edu"
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:36:42 -, Leigh Porter said:
>> I'm looking forward to the awful experience
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
> Sent: 16 September 2011 16:05
> To: John Curran
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Disappointing ARIN - A great advertisement for the USA ?
>
> > If you have a particular suggestion for changing whois, please
> > feel free to
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:char...@knownelement.com]
> Sent: 16 September 2011 20:47
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building
> a nationwide network
>
>
>
> Wow this turned into a very long post
>
> On
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
> Sent: 16 September 2011 21:38
> To: Randy Carpenter
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on
> building a nationwide network
>
> > As an ISP, ARIN wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
> Sent: 18 September 2011 23:14
> To: 'Charles N Wyble'; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on
> building a nationwide network
>
> Where I live in rural America, I would not b
What exactly do you mean by meaningful traffic? ICMP from port to port works,
can you pass TCP? SSH between routers? Establish a TCP session over it?
Are you using Juniper SRXs ? :-)
--
Leigh Porter
On 19 Sep 2011, at 08:24, "jacob miller" wrote:
> I have tried the pings a
It does sound like an MTU issue. Symptoms are typical. Did you try pings end to
end with DF bit set and full size datagrams?
--
Leigh Porter
On 19 Sep 2011, at 09:15, "jacob miller" wrote:
> By meanigful traffic I mean traffic like Http traffic
>
> Am able to ssh no pr
Did you try turning it off and on again? ;-)
--
Leigh Porter
On 19 Sep 2011, at 10:21, "jacob miller" wrote:
> I have triend to do a ping with the DF bit set.
> Maximum am able to get to is 1600.
> This am guessing is because of the fact I have set the mtu size on My
Yeah.. +1 reasons not to use Google Aps..
--
Leigh Porter
> -Original Message-
> From: Meftah Tayeb [mailto:tayeb.mef...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2011 13:19
> To: foks; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Mails to Google being blocked for illegal attachments
>
&
8pussy.org ?
--
Leigh Porter
On 4 Oct 2011, at 10:59, "Ben Roeder" wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> We have used octopussy ( http://www.8pussy.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=home yes
> it is work safe :-) ) with ok results.
> Have used sec ( simple event correlator http://simple-
I used a passive TCP RTT calculator and TCP re-trans monitor to guess the
conditions to a host or group of hosts with some success. I the. Derived the
network "weather" from this and it worked pretty well to dynamically tune DPI
box policing for wireless networks.
It also makes cool graphs. Esp
s just that I haven't personally seen a full
> blown failure like that without human help.
You have not seen VIP2-40s and CEF in action ;-)
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Sec
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. [mailto:fo...@lemcoe.com]
> Sent: 12 October 2011 18:01
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide
>
> Haven't received an e-mail on my Blackberry since around 4AM, located
> in Atlanta.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikolay Shopik [mailto:sho...@inblock.ru]
> Sent: 14 October 2011 10:17
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide
>
> On 13/10/11 19:56, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > Rebuilding this trust can take some time. I do
On 25 Oct 2011, at 09:34, "Tim" wrote:
> This sadly is very common. It is getting more common by the day it seems but
> this practice has started almost a decade ago.
>
> An easy work around is to use a custom port as they seem to just block port
> 25 as a bad port but leave just about everythin
servers and we can set them a bespoke profile for rate
limiting and message size etc etc.
That worked rather well because people's email got out and SPAM was largely
stopped.
The Ironports were darn good boxes if a little pricey,
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
I looked at Statseeker a while back and it was very good.
--
Leigh
On 27 Oct 2011, at 09:47, "Alex Nderitu" wrote:
> Hello,
> What solutions do you guys in the fixed network business/ISPs use to provide
> customer portals for network KPI reporting to customers in a fixed network on
> real
For London:
http://www.netsumo.com/
--
Leigh Porter
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Rae [mailto:mike@sjrb.ca]
> Sent: 31 October 2011 16:26
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Hands and Eyes for London and Amsterdam
>
> Hi :
>
> Looking for some recomm
s
> once for 5 to 10+ year life ...)
>
Most networks seem to dish out address space behind a LSN box these days.
I have three dongle things from three networks in the UK, none of them give me
a public address.
--
Leigh Porter
___
e is no way I would allow that either. But really, providing a
reverse zone and forward zone to match is a case of five minutes and a shell
script or a DNS that as Steinar said, will synthesise results.
It's really not all that difficult..
--
Leigh Porter
__
On 7 Nov 2011, at 14:03, "Bjørn Mork" wrote:
> Leigh Porter writes:
>
>> Indeed, there is no way I would allow that either. But really,
>> providing a reverse zone and forward zone to match is a case of five
>> minutes and a shell script or a DNS that a
My 10.4r1.9 boxes died also but I saw interfaces go down whilst bgpd seemed
stable.
--
Leigh
On 7 Nov 2011, at 15:34, "Pierre-Yves Maunier" wrote:
> 2011/11/7 Tom Hill
>
>> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:00 -0500, Todd Snyder wrote:
>>> We seem to be having some problems with our tata links -
On 7 Nov 2011, at 16:41, "Todd Snyder" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Richard Golodner <
> rgolod...@infratection.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:09 -0500, Todd Snyder wrote:
>>> Can anyone point to any authoritative updates about this?
>>
>>I think Jared's sugges
Any thoughts on just how wide read this was? Did every Juniper that receives
Internet BGP updates with the affected software break? Or did it die out quite
quickly?
--
Leigh
On 7 Nov 2011, at 19:55, "John van Oppen" wrote:
> We saw several customers go away this morning as well. Our netwo
So if you want to launch a DoS attack against a specific IP address you spoof
TCP3389 SYNs to networks single homed to XO and they will null it for you.
--
Leigh
On 8 Nov 2011, at 04:36, "Blake T. Pfankuch" wrote:
> Oh yes! Good lord I about went insane with this. I was working with a
> c
On 8 Nov 2011, at 18:24, "Dobbins, Roland" wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, wrote:
>
>> that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for
>> routing security have been a help in this event?
>
> SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't
would expect a high incidence of change to trigger
something sensible to mitigate this kind of craziness from happening. I am sure
enough people have had incorrectly scaled RADIUS farms blow up when a load of
DSLAMS vanish and come back again not to repeat such storms.
--
Leigh Porter
I was involved in a security review of a SCADA system a couple of years ago.
Their guy was very impressed with himself and his "Internet air-gap" but
managed to leave all their ops consoles on both the SCADA network and their
internal corp LAN.
Their corp LAN was a mess with holes through their
On 14 Nov 2011, at 18:52, "McCall, Gabriel"
wrote:
> Chuck, you're right that this should not happen- but the reason it should not
> happen is because you have a properly functioning stateful firewall, not
> because you're using NAT. If your firewall is working properly, then having
> publi
On 15 Nov 2011, at 15:36, "Owen DeLong" wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 14 Nov 2011, at 18:52, "McCall, Gabriel"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck, you're right that this should n
edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org; McCall, Gabriel
> Subject: Re: Arguing against using public IP space
>
>> And this is totally overlooking the fact that the vast majority of
> *actual* attacks these days are web-based drive-b
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
> Sent: 16 November 2011 13:38
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Have they stopped teaching Defense in Depth?
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jimmy Hess"
>
> > Or, the attack is against a legitimate user's outboun
I checked the SCADA boxes used in our "smart" building. They are all using
127.0.0.1
Is that a security risk?
--
Leigh Porter
On 21 Nov 2011, at 19:20, "Arturo Servin" wrote:
>
>I wonder if they are using private IP addresses.
>
> -as
>
> On 21
On 21 Nov 2011, at 20:23, "Ryan Pavely" wrote:
> Might I suggest using 127.0.0.2 if you want less spam :P
>
> Pretty scary that folks have
> 1. Their scada gear on public networks, not behind vpns and firewalls.
Do people really do that? Just dump a /24 of routable space on a network and
use
Brocade have some reasonable boxes.
--
Leigh Porter
On 22 Nov 2011, at 15:40, "Deric Kwok" wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can I know any selection of Linux routers except cisco / juniper?
>
> They are reliable and have good support provided
>
> We would like to get
Has anybody had experience of mikrotik support? Is it any good? Any thoughts
about the time to fix bugs?
--
Leigh
On 22 Nov 2011, at 15:57, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> mikrotik family .. you can have all sizes and shapes of routers ..
> lots of support available online or from independent consu
wireless and much more.
> thank you
>
> ----- Original Message - From: "Leigh Porter"
>
> To:
> Cc: "nanog list"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 6:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Any recommended router. They are reliable and have good support.
>
>
> Has a
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net]
> Sent: 23 November 2011 16:53
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Odd router brokenness
>
> On 11/23/11 11:33 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > On (2011-11-23 09:41 -0500), Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> >
> >> The question is: How does
I am looking for just such a person now. Good Juniper, some Cisco and Sysadmin
experience with an ISP background..
I expect it will be immensely difficult to find somebody. What makes it even
more frustrating is that just such a person was not all that long ago made
redundant!
So if anybody is
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
> Sent: 01 December 2011 16:15
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.
> It's a wonderful double edged sword. Someone who can think their way
> out of a myriad of technic
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Dahm [mailto:t.d...@resolution.de]
> Sent: 02 December 2011 12:28
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.
>
> Am 12/1/11 9:35 PM, schrieb David Radcliffe:
> > Since I like to work and code (I spend 10 hou
or requiring the space within the next 12
months BEFORE they part with their cash.
It would be most amusing for somebody to buy space, hand over the money and
then have ARIN deny the transfer.
So I do wonder, how is this policy is being enforced and will ARIN be
investigating
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org]
> Sent: 02 December 2011 19:26
> To: Leo Bicknell
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: IP addresses are now assets
>
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> > In a message written on Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:04:
This pretty much says it all, I think:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co_DNpTMKXk
--
Leigh
> -Original Message-
> From: Keegan Holley [mailto:keegan.hol...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2011 18:50
> To: Jay Ashworth
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: On Working Remotely
>
> Maybe I have a d
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19
> To: Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>
> > and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account
> and
> -Original Message-
> From: Chaim Rieger [mailto:chaim.rie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 December 2011 06:10
> To: IPv4 Brokers; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Your Christmas Bonus Has Arrived
>
> What do you have for those that don't do the whole Jesus thing ?
>
That would be Hell..
--
I love the anti v6 stuff on some of their sites!
http://www.iptrading.com/news/news.htm
--
Leigh
On 14 Dec 2011, at 12:21, "John Curran" wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> I believe this company is the one that sold the MS & Borders blocks, so they
>> ma
They are completely unreliable and not to be trusted except for an occasional
general indication of speed.
--
Leigh Porter
On 23 Dec 2011, at 09:20, "jacob miller" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>
> Am interested i
I'd second PCCW. I have contacts there if you drop me a mail off list.
--
Leigh Porter
UKBroadband PCCW...
On 2 Jan 2012, at 14:08, "Paul Rolland" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:30:47 +0100
> Olivier CALVANO wrote:
>
>> anyone have contac
Hi all,
Does anybody know where I can find standards for DC cabling for -48v systems?
I'm looking for general best common practices, cable colouring etc.
Thanks,
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned b
was to build our own mail system. Not that it was an
issue, it never went wrong, but these days I'd just send people to gmail or
something.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.
On 6 Jan 2012, at 07:33, "Måns Nilsson" wrote:
>
> Thanks all who made me think a second round and solve this.
Hence why people prefer to ask people and not GOOG et-al.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has
as shown
>> up 8 years late and is trying to hype it up to compensate?
>
> vpc/vlt/mlag/s/mlt
>
I am using the Brocade version, Multi Chassis Trunking (MCT), and it really
does make things a lot nicer.
--
Leigh Porter
___
On 15 Jan 2012, at 07:39, "Ted Fischer" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Tearing what's left of my hair out.
>
> A customer is getting scanned by a host claiming to be "172.0.1.216".
>
> I know this is bogus, but I want to go back to the customer with as
> much authoritative umph as I can (heaven f
I use ruckus in town and city installs and despite rather a lot of other APs it
performs very well.
I don't have experience of them in high connected station density though.
--
Leigh Porter
On 15 Jan 2012, at 19:33, "Ken King" wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solutio
the firewall as it is rather under specified (not my idea..).
It did originate from Chinese address space and consisted of DNS queries for
lots of hosts. There was also a port-scan in the traffic and a SYN attack on a
few hosts on the same small subnet as the DNS, a web server and an
Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As long as it
is not *my* firewalls I really don't care what they do ;-)
--
Leigh Porter
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis [mailto:den...@justipit.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2012 12:55
> To: Leigh Po
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kristolaitis [mailto:alte...@alter3d.ca]
> Sent: 19 January 2012 16:04
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: RIS raw data
>
> On 12-01-19 10:46 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:52:52 +0900, Randy Bush said:
> >
> >> uselessne
it looks like a capable box. You would do well
to look at the MX80 fixed chassis, it comes with 48 1G interfaces and 4 10G
interfaces. They are pretty good value, I think.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by t
Let's see how many vendors you get listed!
I would go for Brocade.
--
Leigh Porter
On 26 Jan 2012, at 20:24, "Deric Kwok" wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton
> Ipref software can test around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G
&
On 27 Jan 2012, at 10:21, "Fabien Delmotte" wrote:
> I worked for Extreme, and I deployed a lot of X650 (24 10G ports) for
> DataCenter environment. The box is really good.
> In fact if you use the box at a layer 2 it is perfect, BUT DON'T use their
> BGP code, they never understood what is BG
On 30 Jan 2012, at 16:10, "Ray Soucy" wrote:
> What are people using for console servers these days? We've
> historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
> an upgrade.
>
> OpenGear seems to have some nice stuff, anyone else?
>
+1 for OpenGear. I asked this same quest
On 30 Jan 2012, at 18:41, "Brent Jones" wrote:
> Another +1 to Opengear
> Just buy the units that have the pinout for your devices, or you may need
> adapters.
And making them gets boring very quickly!
--
Leigh
__
This email
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
