> -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo [mailto:carlosm3...@gmail.com] > Sent: 09 September 2011 05:10 > To: Mike Jones > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: NAT444 or ? > > When you need to pile up this amount of trickery to make something > work, it's probably high time for letting the thing die :-) > > Warm regards > > Carlos
You could say the same thing about NAT44 from the very start! IPv4 just needs to die sooner rather than later. For now though, there is a good many years of trickery left ;-) -- Leigh Porter ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
