On 8 Nov 2011, at 18:24, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote: > >> that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for >> routing security have been a help in this event? > > SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't intended > to be nor can it possibly be a remedy for vendor-specific implementation > problems. > > Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in > SIDR/DANE architecture, implementation, and deployment. But at the end of > the day, vendors are still responsible for their own code. > > Indeed, we can expect new and exciting ways to blow up networks with SIDR. -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
