And that will teach me not to read the thread!
-- Leigh ________________________________________ From: Tom Hill [t...@ninjabadger.net] Sent: 16 June 2011 13:46 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:30 +0000, Leigh Porter wrote: > I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just > using IPv6 for this? I was going to mention this, but it's only the neighbor address that is IPv6. You still need an IPv4 next-hop and that is where the issue is in using RFC1918 within this scenario. Tom ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
