hey,
Juniper has chosen to use their own silicon for most of their dense 100G
platforms, but you’ll see these chips used by pretty much everyone else I
imagine at some point in the next year.
Juniper silicon has one big advantage over BCM88670 - it supports 2M FIB
entries. This makes PTX100
On 19/Jan/16 13:54, Tarko Tikan wrote:
>
> Juniper silicon has one big advantage over BCM88670 - it supports 2M
> FIB entries. This makes PTX1000 (and QFX10002) very attractive
> platform for SPs.
Vendor-owned silicon will always provide better all-round performance.
It's just pricier.
Mark.
I was hoping this new Broadcom chip would be able to support enough routes
to hold a full BGP table, and be used for something like cumulus linux. I
have no need for 100G, but 10G and 40G on a platform with deeper buffers
sounds nice.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Phil Bedard wrote:
> The BCM
It does support a path to use an external TCAM if vendors do that, and will
support 1M+ entries. It will be more expensive and the datapath will be slower
which will impact the performance a bit.
I think you’ll see this make its way into something like a 48x10G/4x100G (or
40G) type platform
FBI agents, like most cops, aren't inclined to believe in coincidence.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/01/fbi-mulls-connection-between-super-bowl-ca-fiber-optic-cable-cuttings/
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer
Hi,
Some points:
1.DNX SDK is significantly different from SGX, adopted by Cumulus and such, yet
to be done, and this is not negligible amount of work
2.if you are not interested in capacity but in scale, there’re other BCM chips,
perhaps more suitable
3.you don’t have to have all the forwarding
Correct me if I’m wrong, but these FO vandalisms have been going on in the bay
area since before the stadium
was even funded.
This leads me to believe that this is just another example of an LE landgrab.
Owen
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 07:47 , Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
> FBI agents, like most cops,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Owen DeLong wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong, but these FO vandalisms have been going on in the bay
area since before the stadium
was even funded.
This leads me to believe that this is just another example of an LE landgrab.
Or a media site generating click bait.
Before si
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> Correct me if I’m wrong, but these FO vandalisms have been going on in the bay
> area since before the stadium
> was even funded.
>
> This leads me to believe that this is just another example of an LE landgrab.
How old's the stadium? The ar
Broke ground in April 2012
http://www.mercurynews.com/southbayfootball/ci_20434376/49ers-break-ground-this-evening-stadium-at-center
-Grant
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Owen DeLong"
>
> > Correct me if I’m wrong, but these F
Am I the only one who thinks the below line is BS?
"...pose a risk of injury to event-goers if an operator loses control."
If there is not safeguards in-place for "normal" network issues then
we would of heard of injuries before.
On 19 January 2016 at 21:30, Grant Ridder wrote:
> Broke ground
On 01/19/2016 12:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks the below line is BS?
"...pose a risk of injury to event-goers if an operator loses control."
If there is not safeguards in-place for "normal" network issues then
we would of heard of injuries before.
I think that line
Well,
( In context )
I can tell you that a 4 propeller's drone to the face kinda hurt.
Because that was the context where that quote was ripped from.
-
What's more, the memo also asserted that drones used by "malicious"
actors "may present a low-altitude hazard to aviation
Just wondering if anyone has had success with trusted 3rd party vendors for
ISP/Telco CALEA compliance? If so any recommendations?
Thanks,
-Brent
Why do we believe network administrators can advocate perfectly for
customer access?
I couldn't control my own children's access without making us all
miserable.
Nation state access control in a free country at the network layer is bound
to fail, way too many cats to herd.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016
We're currently using Vantage Point out of North Dakota. Haven't had to
actually put anything into production as of yet though.
-Original Message-
From: "Crier, Brent"
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:04am
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Lawful Intercept Trusted 3rd Party
Just
I fail to see how drones relate to fiber cuts and the superbowl. Did the
article author just throw that in there? The news helicopter getting aerial
footage also poses a risk, so not sure what's special about drones.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Well,
>
> ( In c
Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB optimization right
now. The key is having the programmability on the device to make it happen.
Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to filter RIB->FIB and I believe both
also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs now. I am not sure if tha
On 1/18/16 10:38 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Hello,
Don't suppose anyone has a contact for Verizon's e-mail department?
Filled out a request on their whitelist page, and they only checked the
last IP address in the list that I provided. Naturally, I responded
back with a copy of the reject showin
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 14:39, Brielle Bruns wrote:
>
> On 1/18/16 10:38 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
>> visit 550 http://www.verizon.net/whitelist and request removal of the
>> block. 160118)
> It's really really hard to contact your support department, Verizon, if you
> have the same filters in p
I'm fairly certain they are most concerned with this specific section: "allow
unauthorized video coverage of events". It's not surprising they threw a drone
into the story, seems to be all anyone talks about these days...
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/19/2016 4:33 PM, Mario Eirea wrote:
> I'm fairly certain they are most concerned with this specific
> section: "allow unauthorized video coverage of events". It's not
> surprising they threw a drone into the story, seems to be all
> anyone tal
On January 19, 2016 at 10:12 m...@es.net (Michael O'Connor) wrote:
> Why do we believe network administrators can advocate perfectly for
> customer access?
Which is why I was advocating for some sort of generally agreed upon
standards and process written into contractual agreements.
This doesn
On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB optimization
> right now. The key is having the programmability on the device to make it
> happen. Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to filter RIB->FIB and I
> believe both also do pe
24 matches
Mail list logo
