-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 1/19/2016 4:33 PM, Mario Eirea wrote:
> I'm fairly certain they are most concerned with this specific > section: "allow unauthorized video coverage of events". It's not > surprising they threw a drone into the story, seems to be all > anyone talks about these days... > While I agree that the broadcast networks are concerned about unauthorized recording and/or rebroadcasting of the event, there's also a precedent on a drone crashing during a high-profile sporting event in the U.S.: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/04/us/us-open-tennis-drone-arrest/index.html $.02, - - ferg > -----Original Message----- From: NANOG > [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Doug Barton Sent: > Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:58 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: > ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl > > On 01/19/2016 12:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote: >> Am I the only one who thinks the below line is BS? >> >> "...pose a risk of injury to event-goers if an operator loses >> control." >> >> If there is not safeguards in-place for "normal" network issues >> then we would of heard of injuries before. > > I think that line refers to drone operators ... > - -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlae18gACgkQKJasdVTchbKcgwEA1erPchMF1EXl4rVnW5HTO/Jv Uv4GOtkNZUQf4/llrBoBALbmry6CLumAEeNFZEhaHZcr0QWQtYTtlZJk5l5pvujS =3a32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----