I'm fairly certain they are most concerned with this specific section: "allow unauthorized video coverage of events". It's not surprising they threw a drone into the story, seems to be all anyone talks about these days...
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Doug Barton Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:58 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl On 01/19/2016 12:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote: > Am I the only one who thinks the below line is BS? > > "...pose a risk of injury to event-goers if an operator loses control." > > If there is not safeguards in-place for "normal" network issues then > we would of heard of injuries before. I think that line refers to drone operators ...
