On 2/12/2010 17:51, Rob Thomas wrote:
> Hi, Seth.
>
>> While I have your attention, I've noticed there's been a bit of
>> instability lately with the BGP sessions (in fact one of mine right now
>> is down). With 30 routes it's not a big deal to have frequent churn, but
>> if you're going to expand
Hi, Seth.
> While I have your attention, I've noticed there's been a bit of
> instability lately with the BGP sessions (in fact one of mine right now
> is down). With 30 routes it's not a big deal to have frequent churn, but
> if you're going to expand that to a larger feed then it could become a
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
>> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
>> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do
>> with internal
On 13/02/2010, at 2:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>
>> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
>> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
>> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neig
On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do
> with internal gear. I can't say that I
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 13:47, Tim Wilde wrote:
>> On 2/12/2010 4:21 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>>> I've a question for the CYMRU Team , My reasoning for posting here
>>> is to get a much wide knowledge base .
>>> Does or Is the 'Bogon Peering' Product(?) , Only at the
On 12/02/2010 21:21, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> ps:I am Very well aware that (so far) there is no standard format
> for returned requests from *whois daemons .
eh, what are you talking about?
If you want to prefix-filter your bgp feeds using RPSL objects, you can
pull the "fltr-bogons"
On 2/12/2010 13:47, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 4:21 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>> I've a question for the CYMRU Team , My reasoning for posting here
>> is to get a much wide knowledge base .
>
>> Does or Is the 'Bogon Peering' Product(?) , Only at the IANA->RIR
>> allocation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/12/2010 4:21 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> I've a question for the CYMRU Team , My reasoning for posting here
> is to get a much wide knowledge base .
>
> Does or Is the 'Bogon Peering' Product(?) , Only at the IANA->RIR
> alloca
Current list of prefixes Cymru considers bogon:
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/bogon-bn-nonagg.txt
Does that answer the question?
-Jack Carrozzo
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere
wrote:
> Hello All ,
>
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Bill Blackford wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb
Hello All ,
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Bill Blackford wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Magill
wrote:
In efforts to further protect us against threats I am considering
establishing Bogon peers to enable me to filter unallocated address
space. I am just wondering if this is a
Thanks to everyone who replied. That settles it! I'm going to do it.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Carrozzo [mailto:j...@crepinc.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Steve Bertrand
Cc: Thomas Magill; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
I agree - quick
I agree - quick setup and no issues. A++ Would Peer Again
-Jack Carrozzo
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Thomas Magill wrote:
>> In efforts to further protect us against threats I am considering
>> establishing Bogon peers to enable me to filter unallocated address
>> sp
Thomas Magill wrote:
> In efforts to further protect us against threats I am considering
> establishing Bogon peers to enable me to filter unallocated address
> space. I am just wondering if this is a worthwhile step to take and if
> anyone has ran into any issues or points of concern that I may w
I've been doing this for some time on two routers injecting the null routes
into my AS. No issues. Beats the heck out of trying to use ACLs. However,
the prefix count is rapidly diminishing as more blocks are being released by
the various RIRs hence being pulled from the bogon list.
-b
On Fri, Fe
15 matches
Mail list logo
