Jeffrey Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:21 AM, JC Dill wrote:
| Customers also have/know
| about ccare@ which also works. Non-customers (surprise - not everyone is
an
| Akamai customer, and non-customers do have valid reasons to contact a NOC
| now and then) who don't know about the sup
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:21 AM, JC Dill wrote:
| jamie rishaw wrote:
| |
| | Akamai customer support is cc...@.
|
| No one said that noc@ was "not the place" - someone (who works at Akamai)
| said that the RFC specified noc@ works, and it does.
it was a redirect, and he was pretty rude
| To sum
jamie rishaw wrote:
Akamai customer support is cc...@.
Anyone claiming noc@ : not the place for issues to go to, and Akamai will
tell you that.[4]
No one said that noc@ was "not the place" - someone (who works at
Akamai) said that the RFC specified noc@ works, and it does. Someone
else s
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, JC Dill wrote:
>
> The reply I received came from someone who works in the NOC, not from
> Patrick (who doesn't work in the NOC).
>
> It's really poor form to make these unfounded assertions without any basis
> for them.
> jc
[Akamai customer. Hi.]
Akamai custo
Nothing is unfounded. I've previously had issues reaching Akamai at
n...@akamai.com, which is why I suggested that the poster try the
ccare@ address.
It was subsequently demonstrated (by Patrick and others) that the noc@
account is currently monitored satisfactorily.
Any further discussion would
Paul Wall wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Paul Wall wrote:
I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is in-house
doesn't realize that n...@akamai is a black hole.
I am pleased hear that Akamai has remedied this situation, most likely
by having Mr. G
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Paul Wall wrote:
> I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is
> in-house doesn't realize that n...@akamai is a black hole.
I am pleased hear that Akamai has remedied this situation, most likely
by having Mr. Gilmore attend to the matt
t;blackhole" based on our experience...
Paul Stewart
-Original Message-
From: JC Dill [mailto:jcdill.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:03 PM
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Akamai wierdness
Paul Wall wrote:
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
Perhaps using the RF
tewart
-Original Message-
From: JC Dill [mailto:jcdill.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:03 PM
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Akamai wierdness
Paul Wall wrote:
> Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
>
>> Perhaps using the RFC required address [...@akamai] would
Paul Wall wrote:
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
Perhaps using the RFC required address [...@akamai] would be more
productive than e-mailing 10k strangers?
Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the
Internet is not going nutz, the delete key exp
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
> Perhaps using the RFC required address [...@akamai] would be more
productive than e-mailing 10k strangers?
Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the
Internet is not going nutz, the delete key explains how worried i am.
Ba
On Mar 22, 2009, at 21:39, "John Palmer \(NANOG Acct\)"
wrote:
Its something to do with Akamai in Chicago. Been flakey all day.
- Original Message - From: "Paul Stewart" >
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)"
Cc: "NANOG list"
Sent: Su
Its something to do with Akamai in Chicago. Been flakey all day.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stewart"
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)"
Cc: "NANOG list"
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: Akamai wierdness
Hi there..
Chicagotrib
Hi there..
Chicagotribune.com is coming up from here (Toronto area) but very slow
loading suntimes.com loads nice and fast from here.
Having said that, we're an Akamai powered network here so presume
most/all is coming from local caches didn't break down each page to
see sources...
Paul
14 matches
Mail list logo
