jamie rishaw wrote:
Akamai customer support is cc...@.
<snip>
Anyone claiming noc@ : not the place for issues to go to, and Akamai will
tell you that.[4]
No one said that noc@ was "not the place" - someone (who works at
Akamai) said that the RFC specified noc@ works, and it does. Someone
else said it didn't work, and that person was incorrect (as my testing
proves) - perhaps the NOC has better things to do than engage with a
nym/troll when it "tests" if the noc@ address works or not.
To summarize:
The RFC-specified noc@ address exists and works. Customers also
have/know about ccare@ which also works. Non-customers (surprise - not
everyone is an Akamai customer, and non-customers do have valid reasons
to contact a NOC now and then) who don't know about the super sekret[1]
ccare@ can use n...@.
Is there some point you wanted to make that contradicts all of this?
jc
[1] TIN(Sekret)C
