Why not just go the whitebox route and pick your NOS of choice?
Far cheaper, and far more flexible.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 7:28 AM Colton Conor wrote:
> Of the two large Chinese Vendors, which has the better network operating
> system? Huawei is much larger that ZTE is my understanding, but larg
Not hard to do in the US where most access networks still aren't
supporting IPv6.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Ca By wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:48 PM Michael Crapse wrote:
>
>> Has Hulu, or a thousand other content distributors considered IPv6? Because
>> you can't even tunnel to ipv
https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/7o4y40/meltdownspectre_vulnerability_tracker/
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious to hear the impact on network devices of this new hardware
> flaws that everybody talk about. Yes, the Meltdown/S
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/14/google-raise-your-data-center-temperature
On Oct 11, 2017 11:56 AM, "Zachary Winnerman"
wrote:
> I recall some evidence that 80+F temps can reduce hard drive lifetime,
> though it might be outdated as it was from before SSDs were around. I
>
I'm dumb, Brielle is right.
1.9.0, 1.9.5, 1.9.7h1
1.9.8dev and 1.9.8b1 are for two other newer products.
On Aug 11, 2017 11:16 PM, "Brielle Bruns" wrote:
> On 8/11/2017 9:34 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
>> As an additional note, sometimes drivers get backported,
As an additional note, sometimes drivers get backported, this is how
1.9.7hotfix1 works on Infinity. There are multiple trees in various stages
of dev at any given time.
On Aug 11, 2017 10:29 AM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> Since it's been announced now...
>
> I have an
ug 11, 2017 10:03 AM, "Nick W" wrote:
> 1.9.7 definitely applies to Infinity:
>
> ER-8-XG:
> https://dl.ubnt.com/firmwares/edgemax/v1.9.7/ER-e1000.v1.9.
> 7+hotfix.1.5005858.tar
> (SHA256:b1a16900e3fbe1eef3876548ac7eda12a95ef849d4328f22b478459e2a506b92)
>
>
&
Forgot reply all...
That does not apply to the infinity. Those shipped with 1.9.8dev.
On Aug 8, 2017 8:03 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> 1.9.7+hotfix.1 is the currently available stable. 1.9.1.1 was released on
> May 1st.
>
> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Updates-Blog/EdgeMAX-
> EdgeRoute
😁
On Jul 24, 2017 9:40 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> This e-mail was of a sufficient poke to the original contact I reached out
> to and the ball is now rolling.
>
> You will now be returned to your regularly scheduled programming.
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
6.3 ;)
- Josh
On Jul 5, 2017 2:10 PM, "Paul Gear" wrote:
> On 04/07/17 12:28, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >>>
> >>> As far as automation, it's a JunOS-like CLI originally based on vyatta,
> >>> which AT&T now owns - and one of the main reasons is it's
> scriptability,
> >>> use of Ansibl
I kinda feel the same way. I wish FRR was a big more mature at this
point though.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Why not use a Linux or BSD computer for this? It is cheap and you know
> exactly what you are getting. It will forward 10 gig at line rate at least
> for no
EdgeOS was forked and employees were poached from Vyatta before it was
purchased by Broadcom, when it was open source. I think a few things
came down from VyOS after that, but not many.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
> On Mon 2017-Jul-03 19:26:17 -0500, Josh Re
- Josh
On Jul 3, 2017 7:23 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> Specs...
>
>
>- MIPS64 16 Core 1.8 GHz
>- 16 GB DDR4 RAM
>- 8 MB NOR Flash 4 GB eMMC NAND Flash
>- Data Ports: (1) RJ45 Serial Port, (8) SFP+ Ports (1) RJ45 Gigabit
>Ethernet Po
... it might help explaining what the site did.
- Josh
On Jun 28, 2017 10:51 AM, "Sean Hunter" wrote:
> Anyone know of a site with similar functionality? internetpulse.net
> redirects to Dynatrace homepage now.
>
Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds"
> To: "Justin Wilson"
> Cc: "NANOG"
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:06:00 AM
Would you mind naming the company so that they can be publicly shamed? That
is nothing sort of extortion.
On Mar 19, 2017 10:36 PM, "Justin Wilson" wrote:
>
> Then you have the lists which want money to be removed. I have an IP that
> was blacklisted by hotmail. Just a single IP. I have gone th
That's a genious idead
On Jan 23, 2017 11:17 AM, "Leo Bicknell" wrote:
> In a message written on Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:22:20PM -0600, Stas Bilder
> wrote:
> > Now, to the projects.
> > I have never heard of seen PON on a DC level.
>
> A friend of mine told me of a fascinating in-data center PO
I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this:
http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/a-bigger-helping-of-internet-please
On Jan 16, 2017 1:03 AM, "Yucong Sun" wrote:
> In my setup, I use an BIRD instance to combine multiple internet full
> tables, i use some filter to generate some override route to send to
few AS
> hops away from Netflix.
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds"
> To: "Steven Miano"
> Cc:
re from my provider in the Tampa Bay area at:
> speedtest.bhn.net).
>
> ~Steven
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Josh Reynolds
> wrote:
>
>> A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
>> server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbp
A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
Netflix open connect appliance.
On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" wrote:
> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.
>
> ...also with
Or due to capacity issues.
On Nov 16, 2016 7:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> I'm in Chicago and I saw mine going to Miami as well (per rDNS). Haven't
> looked into it at all.
>
> I did see a video where they said they occasionally purposely give people
> less than ideal facilities to test connect
ropeguru.com wrote:
>>
>> The very last POC was updated in 2015, but also out of Fort Collins.
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:59:16 -0600
>> Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>> Just looking at that info... hasn't been updated since 2005 and is
>>> listed as be
Just looking at that info... hasn't been updated since 2005 and is
listed as being at Ft Collins.
So I'll be complaining to some people on Monday :)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Herriage, James L. wrote:
> POCs here:
> uda.gov = 162.79.29.12
> https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-162-79-0
Just a head's up, resolution may not happen today - it's veteran's day,
which of course is a federal holiday.
On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote:
> Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government?
> Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to som
*Cough*
I might know some people. Standby.
On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote:
> Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government?
> Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to some government web
> servers (discovered on http://www.usda.gov - we
pt, and that you can't just say that only two
> protocols are suitable for all jobs.
>
> /Charles
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Josh Reynolds
> wrote:
> > As cute as your impotent white knighting of one vendor is (I very much
> like
> > Juniper BTW), you
> Tim
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Josh Reynolds
> wrote:
>
>> Oops, forgot link. Cooking dinner :)
>>
>> http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2016 6:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a s
Oops, forgot link. Cooking dinner :)
http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/
On Nov 10, 2016 6:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> Here's a start!
>
> "Support for OSPFv3 and IS-IS is various beta states currently; IS-IS for
> IPv4 is believed to be usable while OSPFv3 and IS
; Just name 1 feature that was in Cisco and wasn't in other
> implementations... Just one.. Something.. Does ISIS on IOS make and
> hand out ice cream on Fridays? I want to know if I'm missing out..
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Josh Reynolds
ot such a broad landscape, so I think "use the right tool for the
> job" seems very apt, and that you can't just say that only two
> protocols are suitable for all jobs.
>
> /Charles
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Josh Reynolds
> wrote:
> > As cute as y
flexibility in your environment
as you can have, you want OSPF or BGP as your IGP.
On Nov 10, 2016 5:33 PM, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
> > I didn't "trash talk" a vendor. If I did, it would be a multi-thousand
> > line hate fueled
SPF. This was my
experience at the time, based on my research and discussions with the
vendors.
On Nov 10, 2016 3:49 PM, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
> > I'm sure a lot has changed with Juniper as of 2011 in regard to IS-IS
> > support, which wa
7 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> I have not kept up with all of the feature differences between Cisco's
>> implementation and the other vendors. I can only encourage others
>> interested in this to compare the specific feature sets between the
>> t
tally different from another data center,
transport, or transit network provider.
If I were a vendor or one of the other I would likely have a list of
what I do support, or what my competition does not support.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
&g
As with anything, it depends on what your needs are.
https://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/search-features.html
Type IS-IS in the box
Feature set will vary between JunOS releases.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> Juniper of
Juniper of their own merits, but they miss many of the IS-IS features
Cisco has (of course).
Huawei has very "Cisco-like" code, so there's that...
Can't speak for Nokia.
On Nov 10, 2016 12:22 PM, wrote:
> > Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
> >
> > Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc yo
Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the
whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on OSPF.
On Nov 10, 2016 12:13 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/Nov/16
Vendor support for IS-IS is quite limited - many options for OSPF.
On Nov 9, 2016 8:47 PM, "RT Parrish" wrote:
> I will definitely be looking up the notes from AOL that John referenced.
> But working for a vendor and getting insight from multiple ISPs, here are a
> few of the things that I hear
i think this would be the most effective route proposed so far.
May the force be with you :)
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:06:34AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec
> wrote:
>> The makers of IoT devices are falling all over themselves
You CAN actually block things, within reason. The caveat is you simply have
to disclose it. There is a 'reasonable network management' clause. IANAL,
please consult your telecommunications legal team.
On Oct 24, 2016 1:25 AM, "Richard Holbo" wrote:
> I run/manage the networks for several smallis
Modern medicine, sanitation, and sedentary lifestyles for the developed
world have effectively culled natural selection for most internet users.
On Oct 22, 2016 7:16 PM, "Keith Medcalf" wrote:
>
> On: Saturday, 22 October, 2016 17:41, Jean-Francois Mezei <
> jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>
One sec, starting a relationship with $CPEvendor...
I'll let you know how this goes.
"Yes, every customer I went to had malware. That's okay, right?"
;)
On Oct 22, 2016 5:56 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
> In message mail.gmail.com>
> , Josh Reynol
27;m as sympathetic to Aunty Em and Grandma as the next
> I-started-on-a-helpdesk guys, but 'you get what you pay for' applies here
> as much as it does everywhere else...?
>
>
> On 23/10/2016 11:22 a.m., Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
>> And then what? The labor to clean
And then what? The labor to clean up this mess is not free. Who's
responsibility is it? The grandma who got a webcam for Christmas to watch
the squirrels? The ISP?... No... The vendor? What if the vendor had
released a patch to fix the issue months back, and grandma hadn't installed
it?
Making gra
Ah, disregard. I see what you're saying now.
Yes, I can see how that would be problematic.
On Oct 21, 2016 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> Ansible would be a decent start.
>
> On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" wrote:
>
>> On Fri,
Ansible would be a decent start.
On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such
> > as this.
> >
> > randy
> >
>
> I'd love to hear how others are handling the o
Same here :)
On Oct 13, 2016 1:09 PM, "Ryan, Spencer" wrote:
> I was going to point you to the reddit thread about it, but it looks to be
> your thread :)
>
>
> Spencer Ryan | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net sr...@arbor.net>
> Arbor Networks
> +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053
Again, keep doing that :P
Be sure to eBay it for a reasonable price when you are done!
On Oct 1, 2016 10:12 AM, "James Jun" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:22:32AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > Better power performance, newer features, higher capacities sure are all
> great reasons to get
With so many geographically diverse complaints on many hardware routing and
switching platforms, I'm going to go with a "no".
On Sep 21, 2016 4:04 AM, "Baldur Norddahl"
wrote:
> How come we have never seen this problem? We have a ton of DSL and many of
> those are slow, but no customer complaint
Can you elaborate?
On Sep 9, 2016 2:54 PM, "Dan White" wrote:
> Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
> customer facing pings?
>
> --
> Dan White
> BTC Broadband
> Network Admin Lead
> Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
> Fax 918.366.6610
You can also easily police a subnet.
On Sep 8, 2016 6:11 PM, "Pshem Kowalczyk" wrote:
> With NAT I have a single entry/exit point to those infrastructure subnets
> which can be easily policed.
> If I give them public IPs then they're routable and potentially can reach
> the internet via devices
Check with Calix or Ciena.
On Sep 2, 2016 11:27 AM, "Jeremy Malli" wrote:
> I'm hoping somebody on the list has a recommendation for an outdoor
> ADSL2+/VDSL/G.Fast NIU. Been doing so some research into this and have
> come up empty so far.
>
>
> My thinking is that by housing the DSL CPE outsi
Excellent info, thank you Mark.
On Aug 26, 2016 6:53 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
> In message mail.gmail.com>, Josh Reynolds writes:
> >
> > Just looking at the RFC...
> > -
> > VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full
&
Just looking at the RFC...
-
VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full conformance
with this specification is indicated by version '0'. Requestors are
encouraged to set this to the lowest implemented level capable of
expressing a transaction, to minimise the responder and n
Assuming a single 208/30 feed, he also asked about redundancy.
On Aug 17, 2016 5:23 PM, "Justin Wilson" wrote:
> Indiana Data Centers:
> $600-900 per lit rack
>
>
> Chicago
> $1800 per lit rack
>
>
> Ohio
> $700-900 per lit rack
>
>
> Justin Wilson
> j...@mtin.net
>
> ---
> http://www.mtin.net O
This is pretty O/T for this list, isn't it?
On Jul 9, 2016 12:15 PM, "John Levine" wrote:
> At about 16:46 UTC block 420001 showed up on the Bitcoin blockchain,
> so the mining reward per block dropped from 25 to 12.5 btc.
>
> Depending on whom you believe, nothing will change, or most of the
> m
There is an outages list @ puck.nether.net that this might have been better
suited for.
In the future, please list:
Time the issue started (followed by timezone)
Nature of the issue
Troubleshooting steps you've tried
Location
Any additional helpful information to replicate the issue
Time of resolu
What a terrible report.
>From where? What network? Do you see issues through other networks?
- Sent from the gmail web interface
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Web interface is broken, downdetector sure sees activity. This attempt is
> from mobile.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Off
Can somebody from Akamai contact me offlist about a GeoIP location
change for a block please?
Thank you.
Holy fuck get on your meds.
As someone who actually has to deal with 3 different (4 technically)
content providers, their distribution agreements and requirements for
distribution a the way through the network are absolutely asinine, but
required if you want your eyeballs to receive their cont
I've worked at my fair share of eyeball ISPs, and many of them used HE
as one of their connections,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:38 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 6/5/16 6:23 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> Uhm, what? Where do you think ISPs get their transit exactly?
>
> The
I'm assuming you'd like this behavior on EdgeOS changed? I know a guy...
On Jun 5, 2016 8:41 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> > is anyone seeing the dreaded rfc1812 behavior in a citable fashion? how
> > common is it?
>
> we verified that the juniper and cisco platforms we tested replied with
> the sou
ll subset. that said they (HE) can be and are a valuable peer
> both in v4 and v6.
>
> Personally I wouldn't single home to anything that looks tier-1ish but
> your mileage may vary the residential operators I look at tend to be
> fairly diversly connected.
>
> On 6/3/16
You might be one of a handful.
On Jun 3, 2016 7:35 PM, "Gary E. Miller" wrote:
> Yo Spencer!
>
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:13:03 -0400
> Spencer Ryan wrote:
>
> > Yes but HE doesn't serve residential users directly.
>
> Really? I am the only one? Doubtful.
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---
There was just a recent discussion about this.
None of the big upstreams support it because they are all too busy selling
their own DDoS mitigation services :)
On May 28, 2016 5:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> I know support (from customers) is limited among networks. I know it isn't
> on all har
+1
On May 23, 2016 4:53 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote:
> This doesn't scale on a large cacti installation with hundreds of hosts and
> 60-second poller intervals. Cacti data input method scripts spawn a new php
> worker for each data acquisition target (they do NOT use the 'spine' SNMP
> poller).
>
> E
AF24HD can do full duplex 1Gbps
On May 14, 2016 12:17 PM, "Eric Rogers" wrote:
> If it is 3-4KM, I would definitely use the AF24 (24GHz) because it gives
> you 750M/750M Full duplex. For longer, or a backup link, I would use the
> AF5X (not AF5) instead of the B5. That way you have 750M full du
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL JOSH LUTHMAN?!
On May 14, 2016 8:33 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote:
> AF5X is hard to beat and cheaper...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On May 14, 2016 9:29 AM, "Jared Mauch" wrote:
>
> >
maybe try with an odroid?
On May 11, 2016 8:45 PM, "Jon Meek" wrote:
> A note on using a Raspberry Pi as a NTP server. In my limited home lab
> testing the RPi server had enough instability that Internet time sources
> were always preferred by my workstation after ntpd had been running for a
> wh
I hope your receivers aren't all from a single source.
I was in Iraq when this (
http://dailycaller.com/2010/06/01/glitch-shows-how-much-us-military-relies-on-gps/
) happened, which meant I had no GPS guided indirect fire assets for 2
weeks.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
The first rule of prism is...
*silence*
:)
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> This is a large list that includes many Tier 1 network operators,
>> government agencie
nything about it?
>
> Personally, I can't say I've heard anything about CALEA, seen people
> trying to sell CALEA appliances, or received a CALEA request in maybe 8
> years?
>
> On 5/10/16 12:34 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
>> Hrm?
>> On May 9, 2016 11:04 PM, &q
That would be a very poor idea, since a lot of the circuits the DoD
still uses to communicate with are ATM lines :)
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:52:28AM -0400,
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote
> a message of 37 lines which said:
>
>> N
Hrm?
On May 9, 2016 11:04 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
> The OP is also asking someone to register a throwaway email, subscribe, and
> respond "yes" so that the owner can't be tracked to their employer. That's
> kind of a steep ask for something that's almost moot.
> On May 9, 2016 23:16, "Greg Sowe
I've been very happy with the 2.3 release. Modularizing everything and the
new bootstrap GUI is very nice. Updated BSD code base is a godsend.
On May 6, 2016 2:36 PM, "Aris Lambrianidis" wrote:
> Mel Beckman wrote:
>
>> But bug reports and response can be measured, at least by those with
>> suppo
Something else you may want to look for in the future is an email report
from the puck.nether.net outages list.
On May 2, 2016 8:54 AM, "Matt Hoppes"
wrote:
> Yes yes yes, Josh :) Jeff got me the info I was looking for.
>
> On 5/2/16 9:47 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
>>
Disagreeing is okay. It wouldn't make you any less wrong though :P
On May 1, 2016 3:58 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
>
>
> On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> > No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
> > cabinet wear and
In addition, the upgrade path uses the same strands simultaneously.
On May 1, 2016 3:46 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
>
>
> On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> > For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller
> > splits.. 1x16. Some are
No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also end up
using far, far less fiber strands.
On May 1, 2016 3:46 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
>
>
> On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller
splits.. 1x16. Some are doing 1x2's or 1x4's at the corner somewhere into
1x16's or 1x8's, so at the point where you start to hit decent saturation
you can just shrink the upstream split and fuse onto a new upstream strand
/ optic.
Ting's support is the BEST support I've ever had in the IT industry. I
event ended up in a long discussion with one of the reps about custom
roms :P
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> *shrugs* Seems to work here, though if Ting uses T-Mo and Sprint, I suppose
> Ting's more li
With a Chelsio T5 you might get some decent pure routing / NAT performance
with the right card mod, but as soon as it goes into firewall/ACL/QoS etc,
performance will tank drastically.
On Apr 18, 2016 7:49 AM, "Micah Croff" wrote:
> I haven't tried to do 10Gb with it but pfSense isn't a horrible
It does have limited static routing capability built in to the hardware
though, but no NAT.
On Apr 18, 2016 8:25 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> double check the spec sheets, EP-s16 is a switch not a router..
> the smaller units are switch + routers.
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet &
mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack
> On 16/04/2016 10:07 am, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
>
>> Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application.
>> On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote:
>>
>> > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core router
;
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds"
> To: "Andrew Thrift"
> Cc: "NANOG"
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 9:12:13 AM
> Subject: Re: 10G-capable cu
otik routers now support FastPath/FastTrack. This is kind of
> like CEF in Cisco land.
>
> http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Fast_Path
>
> http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack
> On 16/04/2016 10:07 am, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
>
>> Can't do
ge
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds"
> To: "Mike Hammett"
> Cc: "NANOG"
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 8:32:17 PM
> Subject: Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?
>
>
> If I w
this residential use case.
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds&
Would still need a Chelsio / Mellanox etc card, and even then you're not
going to hit line rate if you have NAT or any traffic shaping enabled at
all. Maybe with DPDK/netmap/pf_ring, but that would be some pretty custom
work.
On Apr 15, 2016 6:47 PM, "Michael Brown" wrote:
> Not *exactly* what yo
Different philosophy - strings attached.
When I sell a service, either residential or business or DIA, the terms are
clearly stated. If I were selling a multi-hundred dollar a month service,
the CPE cost is minimal. If I don't offer a service that is at least
*capable* of providing what I'm sellin
As much as I enjoy Mikrotik products and respect my friends and peers who
use them, until ROS 7.x the CCR is a "gimped" product.
On Apr 15, 2016 5:10 PM, "Filip Hruska" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would also vote for Mikrotik products; IMHO this looks perfect for this
> situation.
>
> http://routerboard.c
Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application.
On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote:
> Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+
> support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right now.
>
> -Mike
>
> > On Apr 15, 2016, at 14:52, Aaron wrote:
> >
>
All,
Is NANOG really the best place for this discussion?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> .
>> So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area?
>
> Obligatory xkcd ref: https://xkcd.com/1
I know the 4500/4550 does but it requires a license.
On Apr 12, 2016 8:07 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
They are much more likely to be used for things like Juniper MX960's
(and larger), Brocade MLXe-32's (and larger), etc. Routers and
switches that weigh hundreds or thousands of pounds ;)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Wayne Bouchard wrote:
> In all my time dealing with various colos around the g
http://packetpushers.net/overpriced-optics-by-oems/
On Mar 12, 2016 1:16 PM, "Nicholas Warren"
wrote:
> Quick question for the experts.
>
> Why when looking at SFPs, some sites list them as $800 when the same part
> number can be found on places like amazon for $30-$40. What is the
> difference i
It seems like one of your email servers is on SORBS which is causing
any email outbound from said server to be blocked by those using
SORBS.
IP in question is 209.85.214.170
Offlist responses are fine, thanks
Brocade as well.
On Mar 1, 2016 8:39 AM, "David Bass" wrote:
> I don't agree with that statement (about rare to find big companies using
> Nexus). If you want 10 gig/40 gig (or 100 gig soon) your options are Cisco
> Nexus/Arista/Juniper QFX...some periphery devices as well, but the majority
> us
3 3552
> ja...@rice.edu
>
> On 18, Feb 2016, at 7:59 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> With GRES, can't you simply set the master RE as backup, apply firmware,
> then switch back to master and upgrade the backup RE?
> On Feb 18, 2016 7:57 AM, "Jason Bothe&q
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
