Disagreeing is okay. It wouldn't make you any less wrong though :P On May 1, 2016 3:58 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
> > > On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > > No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power, > > cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also > > end up using far, far less fiber strands. > > > > I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on > forever... > > Lord knows I've been having it since 2008. > > Mark. >
