Russian crew on a Chinese vessel.
I mean how can anyone even doubt the intent.
This is such a tragic comedy on many levels.
Frank
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 5:12 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I think sabotage implies intent.
>
>
> Even the most incompetent crew of an ocean going ves
Hi Erick,
I think I can help you with this. Is there a price point you are looking for?
Best regards,
Frank Aguilar
Sr. Account Manager
Carrier Sales North America
Mobile - 909.217.8372
[Logo Orange Wholesale]
frank.agui...@orange.com<mailto:frank.agui...@orange.com>
oing it, but still.
Well...
If you're using 20.20.20.0/24 which is not "yours" (as I've seen
happen), then certainly your customers can't get to the real 20.20.20.x
And even if that's not announced and used /today/ - this can change
quickly...
Frank
Seems it disappeared now and we can go back to regular programming.
Thanks to those who did that.
Frank
[frank@fisi ~]$ whois -h rr.level3.com 0.0.0.0/32
[Querying rr.level3.com]
[rr.level3.com]
% No entries found for the selected source(s).
[frank@fisi ~]$
On 30/01/2024 19:37, Job
Hi,
I got 2 bounces for the email addresses seen below for an email similar
to the below...
Anyone want to remove this IRR entry before anyone notices...??? ;-)
Frank
I believe that the entry of
route: 0.0.0.0/32
does not serve any good purpose?
I was surprised to see it in a
Also, you don't want to accept Google prefixes from your customer, even
if they are ROV valid.
i.e. you want to restrict what you accept to customer and customer's
customer prefixes...
Frank
On 17/11/2023 08:38, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
If you need to support RTBH you need to ch
t;show ip bgp regexp _37451 2_" in Mark's LG, i see there are
many originated and downstream's prefixes of AS37451 affected.
So i'd now thing it's a AS37451 issue, not AS327933 alone.
Frank
pay something.
I'd guess that
aut-num:AS37451
as-name:CongoTelecom
descr: CONGO TELECOM
has a relationship with them and AS327933 wanted to prepend 2x [1] to
their sole provider. (AS37451)
Frank
[1]
https://bgp.he.net/AS327933#_graph4
t.
Thanks,
Frank
AS53347
AS18883
cture/router IPs (so mtr/traceroute can show useful info)
I would say the absence of reverse DNS tells useful info to receiving
MTAs - to preferably not accept.
Frank
.hosteurope.de [62.138.178.82]
Tried from various sources.
Kind regards,
Frank
policy, it MAY be
modified or removed.
and
https://docs.ixpmanager.org/features/route-servers/#rfc1997-passthru
has some more background.
Hi Nick!
Frank
On 28/10/2022 15:21, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Hi guys (and others),
I couldn't find an official description/explanation of this (EQX docs
bank?
"want to buy 5 of those shiny new CGNAT boxes or only 2 ?"
Frank
e RIR charges membership fee depending on size of IPv4 allocations.
- Will the RIR charge membership fee depending on IPv6 allocation size
in 5 years from now?
And it's a genuine question.
Does anyone know what the intentions or likelihood of options are?
Really interested.
Thanks,
Fra
68.180.160.99|99.160.180.68.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
lo302.cry1.md2.yahoo.com.
Any idea what's going on here? It's as if our 7600 is inspecting this
traffic (presumably because it's not transit, it's being processed by the
CPU) and seeing something special about it. Eve
which is why I contacted them.
Frank
AS53347
the end of
our measurements campaign
page 34:
Conclusions
• Measured IXPs were congestion-free, which promotes peering in the
region
https://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2017/papers/imc17-final182.pdf
my conclusion: s/congestion/congestion or the lack thereof/g
Frank Habicht
PS: yes, i
performance testing rules were developed *after* the money was
handed out – not fair to be held responsible for network that’s out of their
direct and indirect control.
Frank
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 10:56 PM
To: Sean Donelan ; North American
ybe even google's?
slippery slope?
PS: in my opinion it would look a lot more not-evil-doing if the same
would be done with s/DoH/DoT/
Frank
(thinking of it) a solution for really well-known prefixes
available at many instances/locations (like DNS root) would be to have
their fixed set of direct transits at all the "global" nodes and
everywhere else to tell peers to not advertise this to upstreams.
Greetings,
Frank
eering LANs]
...
> Does that sound about right?
to me yes.
Frank
ber of prefixes (incl anycast)
right now
So, I think a (moderated) BGP feed of prefixes a'la bogon from a trusted
{cymru[1], pch[2], ...} could be good [3].
Frank Habicht
37084 / 33791
if that matters
{1] dealing with anycast?
[2] biased?
[3] speaking as someone not using (subscribing)
So much for "working together for the healthy and orderly development of
global Internet"...
Not saying they get more blame than MainOne, but also not less.
Frank
I have a low-cost/high interest rate account at one of the Canadian bank and
each "assisted" transaction is $5.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 3:35 AM
To: George Michaelson
Cc: North American Network Operat
e cheaper if run with
low overhead...
Establishing an "aggregation point" would be the first step, and then
outsiders can see what's possible there.
Frank
not knowing much about the specific environment
Emails to NOC and the "Contact Us" form have gone answered, and we keep
getting more business customer complaints.
Would the NANOG membership be willing to dig into their rolodex and put an
Incapusla person in contact with me?
Thanks,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On
ht be using Incapusla's
service. Packet traces are showing the remote (web) site is issuing a TCP
RST.
Frank
CTO, Premier Communications
to not-prefer-so-much that
advertisement, "use it as a backup".
that would shift a lot of incoming traffic to the other link (regional
provider).
You'll still have the global provider link.
this is a smaller change towards taking global provider offline, keeping
some fallback.
Frank
rgest
(transit?) providers did it, then UDP reflection attacks could be minimized.
If someone can recall the key words in that posting and dig it up, that
would be much appreciated.
Frank
attainable if it was transmitting on the high side,
at +4 dBm.
Is it an industry practice to market distance based on the hot optics, not
on the worst case, which is minimum TX power?
Frank
Being discussed on outages, too.
Our monitoring system saw access to www.amazon.com and www.cablelabs.com
(over v6) down via HE ... amazon came back up for me via Zayo, but when
www.cablelabs.com came back up, it was on HE. So the same as you.
So I suspect HE had a hiccup.
Frank
-Original
200 (or similar number) and implement it (at the
same time or in a separate VLAN) (Nick argues, and i see the problem).
The agreement and actions of the (various) operators of L3 devices
connected at the IXP is what matters and seems not trivial.
They are not under one control.
Frank
4 and 5 always have packet loss - I believe it's due to ICMPv6 rate
limiters protecting their CPU:
Frank
From: Fullenkamp, Terri L [mailto:terri.l.fullenk...@xo.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:59 PM
To: Frank Bulk ; nanog@nanog.org
Cc: # SUP - NCC Level 1 Data
Subject:
XO contacted me offline. Things have bene stable since ~12:15 pm Central.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 12:25 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Packet loss on XO's network
Since ~11:
the packet loss to the
endpoint sustains over 40%. Seems to be between 2610:18:18b:c000::11 and
mcr1.minneapolis-mn.us.xo.net [2610:18::30b8]
Frank
To enterprise.com:
Host
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. router-core.mtcnet.net
0.0% 9290.3 0.6 0.2 37
Here are some threads:
http://markmail.org/message/4hkuymimt54snpyi
http://markmail.org/message/qc67dfw2zi224ciu
http://markmail.org/message/2pqnaoru5gvxwyn5
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of K MEKKAOUI
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10
I was MITMed, but not maliciously, but by Southwest Airline’s system (which
uses Row44). The site doesn’t have to be pinned for a browser to throw up a
warning about the SSL certificate not matching the URL.
I did connect with an SWA employee.
Frank
From: Paras Jha [mailto:pa
create an exception for PayPal just to complete payment.
Frank
rsing, and nothing
with set/clear.
Frank
Surprised no one has mentioned the Multimodem iSMS:
http://www.multitech.com/brands/multimodem-isms
Been using it for 5+ years -- first three years the code wasn't stable, needing
a reboot every few months, but the latest code has been stable for 2+ years.
Frank
-Original Me
+1.
Here's one managed option that non-Calix customers, such as WISPs, have found
interesting: https://www.calix.com/systems/gigafamily-overview/GigaCenters.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson
Sent: Thursday, Decemb
Good stuff from Duane here:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151215_verisign_perspective_on_recent_root_s
erver_attacks/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 4:27 AM
To: Jim Shankland
Cc: nanog
f the time.
Frank
Storm caused by an L2 loop, malicious attack, bug in router code, or something
else?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Xavier Beaudouin
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 8:22 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Anyone having issues with
What does ADTRAN's NG-PON2 upgrade path have over Calix's?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 8:49 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Favorite GPON Vendor?
We are about do deploy Calix,
Hey!
New message, please read <http://arpitshah.co.in/satisfied.php?h5lk>
Frank Bulk - iName.com
Hey!
New message, please read <http://k12techtips.com/ways.php?ie2>
Frank Bulk
Hey!
New message, please read <http://signranch.com/part.php?8k4r>
Frank Bulk - iName.com
Hey!
New message, please read <http://hurricanedisasterphotos.com/return.php?sel30>
Frank Bulk - iNAME
Hey!
New message, please read <http://www.leapskills.in/trust.php?ptye>
Frank Bulk - iName.com
Hey!
New message, please read <http://redwingscomm.com/done.php?qdk>
Frank P. Troy
So let me ask a question -- there's several folks looking at overall IPv6
usage, but what about on a per-protocol level, and compared to IPv4?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 11:37 AM
To:
ent environment than data center and hosting environments
or when one's network is being used to DDoS a target.
Regards,
Frank
Restored at 1:05 am U.S. Central.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 12:19 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: "Access Denied" when hitting https://www.apple.com issue over IPv4
and 6
to www.apple.com|23.197.157.15|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden
2015-09-12 00:19:07 ERROR 403: Forbidden.
root@nagios:/tmp#
Frank
ave a mgmt.
vrf in some software releases), making it local-only or something you have
to use some kind of pseudo-NAT (all public IPs are translated to
mgmt-network IPs).
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins
Sent: Tuesday, Septembe
How many IPv6 addresses do you get?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Avi Freedman
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 7:31 PM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector
(Jared wrote):
> Most peo
Thanks for all the responses and assistance. I'm not sure if that help was
the reason or not, but the site came back up at 4:16 pm U.S. Central.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:32
http://www.bt.com over IPv6 has been down since ~8:52 am U.S. Central.
Please send me a PM if you have a contact there, or forward this over.
Thanks,
Frank
Bonus: www.brocade.com over IPv6 has been down since last night, too, as the
was removed, but I have a contact there.
root@nagios
What do you think their message should say? We struggled over this, too, and
settled on some soft language, included information on how to purchase more
storage, and also provided our email address and phone numbers.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org
I see that nanog.cluepon.net is still down – is Richard S. *the* person for
this?
Frank
From: Mike Hammett [mailto:na...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:47 PM
To: Josh Luthman
Cc: NANOG list; Frank Bulk
Subject: Re: Access to nanog.cluepon.net
Still down here (and
Upon second look, these are "reconfigurable". Doesn't appear to be the same
as tunable. =(
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 2:07 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Tunable SFP
Thanks, that's very helpful. They have several models there:
https://www.flexoptix.net/en/produkte/transceiver.html?fo_tra_formfactor=sfp
#fo_tra_formfactor=sfp&fo_tra_interface=05_dwdm_100ghz&gan_data=true
Frank
-Original Message-
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 1:44 PM
T
Thanks -- can you point me to any suppliers?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 12:41 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc:
Subject: Re: Tunable SFP
They do exist. They tend to have tighter link budgets as compared to XFP
tunable
Anyone know if tunable SFPs exist? I've googled around on this, but only
found fixed wave-length SFPs.
Or of a tunable SFP+ that can operate in SFP port as 1G?
Frank
I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive
to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached
out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who
has admin access and can set me up again?
Frank
It literally came up within minutes of my posting. =) I know there are
Frontier staff lurking on NANOG and I had already engaged a senior Frontier
person on this last week, but he was dependent on their IT department to
resolve this.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: John Levine
been broken for 6 days.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Bajpai, Vaibhav
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: bing on v6
> On May 21, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Bajpai, Vaibhav
> wrote:
>
Brett,
Please share the subnet with us.
Have you followed through the list here, specifically checking Akamai, and
seeing what it lists?
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/GeoIP
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent
Different division within Comcast. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+frnkblk=iname@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:06 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPTV providers in IN/Chicago
I'm not sure why or that Co
I believe Vubiquity (http://www.vubiquity.com/product-portfolio/livevu/) does,
as well as Comcast HITS
(http://www.comcastwholesale.com/products-services/mpeg-2-content-delivery/mpeg-2-delivery-content-providers).
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On
Those are measured at the campus boundary. I don't have visibility inside
the school's network to know who much intra-campus traffic there may be .
but we know that peer-to-peer is a small percentage of overall Internet
traffic flows, and streaming video remains the largets.
Fran
find 60 km ones.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Baldur Norddahl
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 11:52 AM
To: Rodrigo Augusto
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: booster to gain distance above 60km
Hi
The easy way to get 63 km is to use a SFP+ module
Yes, see this thread:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2015-March/007687.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Debottym Mukherjee
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:14 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level 3 Outage
Did anyone else
ut if
intermediate certificate is missing)
https://www.digicert.com/help/ (will show a green chain link between certs when
they're all there *and* in order)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:36 AM
symmetric speeds, they're not showing a distinctively heavier symmetricity.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:57 PM
To: Scott Helms
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon P
Yes, it's changing -- the ratio is higher. At least that's what tracking of
our eyeball customers has shown over the last 6+ years.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Satchell
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 10:13 AM
I never heard back from anyone, but the two sites came back up 1:59 pm
Central time, so it was down just over a week.
Now it
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 9:39 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject
Emails to what I thought were CenturyLink's NOC have gone unanswered, and
the other email address resulted in an automated "you're not allowed to send
emails to that group".
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:22 AM
To: ne
That's my thought, too -- add DKIM and also work through those Google forms. I
didn't see any red flags when I checked an IP and your host against some email
"measurement" sites.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ben Whorwood
Sent: Thursday, Fe
Unless each customer has in their own L3 domain, you'll also want some kind
of L2 isolation between ports (and also MFF) and IP source address
verification (so that people can't spoof addresses) for both DHPC and static
IP customers. And don't forget the IPv6 equivalents.
Frank
And even if you updated it yourself, it's possible that your service
provider's config file would automatically downgrade it.
Best bet is to ask your internet provider to upgrade your modem.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf
FYI, this topic was discussed on this listserv in mid-October
(http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-October/070532.html) and
mailops (archives restricted to listserv members) in mid-November. In the
NANOG thread reference was made that Verizon was filtering out the 107/8
network.
Frank
We've used a few Zhone ETHX-344x4 (http://www.zhone.com/products/ETHX-3400/)
and been happy with the reliability. Configuration was a bugger, but if you
get one of those I can share my template.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of St
/911-outages/21719669/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+frnkblk=iname@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
David Coulson
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:04 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Akron OH CO outage
Anyone else in North East Ohio seeing an outage of AT&T
, it’s much appreciated. If it’s really just a drop in the ocean, what
does it matter to you?
Frank
From: Joe [mailto:jbfixu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:39 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administr
make people aware of somewhat
related service by ShadowServer
(https://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php/Involve/GetReportsOnYourNetwor
k).
Frank
On what basis do you assume that there is TR-069 support in these routers? And
even if there is, that the service provider manages them via TR-069?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tykwinski
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:47 PM
32 ms26 ms 209.85.243.99
1426 ms25 ms25 ms google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
C:\Users\Frank Bulk>dig @8.8.8.8 a targetly.co
; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 a targetly.co
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEA
http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl/removal-request
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keefe John
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 9:24 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Barracuda Central Contact
Is there anyone here from Barracuda that could help with
e than 200 Mbps", log
on that, and then if it takes 30 or 90 minutes for someone to react, that's
fine, but in the meantime other customers weren't affected.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of joel jaeggli
Sent: Saturday, Novembe
e customers affected.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 8:28 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting
On 9 Nov 2014, at 8:59, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I've writt
ld receive,
that would be very helpful. If my fastest speed (residential) customer was
100 Mbps and I specified that 200 Mbps was the highest, I would never see
high-rate attacks enter our network.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric C. M
Do you know if third-parties such as SANS ISC or ShadowServer take lists of IPs?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of srn.na...@prgmr.com
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:57 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Reporting DDOS reflection attacks
The Google angle is also being discussed on outages. Initial suspicions are
PTB packets not flowing through tunneled connections.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Pete Carah
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
We get this with wireless carriers -- they ask for quote for a 100 Mbps
Ethernet circuit, and then tell us afterwards that it's 100 Mbps of goodput,
so we have to size it to 125 Mbps to cover all their one MPLS and two 802.1Q
tags and to past the RFC 2544 test at 64-byte frames.
For GPON and Ethernet it's just SNMP counters.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:35 PM
To: Livingood, Jason
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port
So it looks
should do it.
And that seems to be the same in v4 and v6
Frank
I would suggest starting with this form:
https://www.maxmind.com/en/correction
More here: http://nanog.peeringdb.com/index.php/GeoIP
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jose Damian Cantu
Davila
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 5:18 PM
To
Are you looking for P-OTS or just xWDM? If the first you may want to look
at Cyan, which is what we use.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth McRae
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 2:59 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Optical Transport Platform
1 - 100 of 593 matches
Mail list logo
