Well, I could certainly be wrong, but it's news to me if UBNT started
supporting DFS in the US.
Your first screenshot is listing the UAP for 5240 which is channel 48,
U-NII-1. The second show 5825 which is the upper limit of U-NNI-3. I
don't see any U-NII-2 in what you posted.
This forum post m
Their "airMAX" line recently got UNII approval but not their UniFi line to my
knowledge:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Updates-Blog/airMAX-FCC-UNII-Updates-Lower-Band-Activation-Process/ba-p/1265946
20. Jun 2015 03:36 by fai...@snappytelecom.net:
> FCC Cert claims different.
>
> :)
>
>
My equipment that can't do 5.4 with the latest stable or beta firmware says
you can't. Hopefully we get 5.1 "soon". :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 19, 2015 11:36 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> FCC Cert claims different.
>
>
FCC Cert claims different.
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
> Cc: "NANOG
Flowroute.com
On Jun 19, 2015 6:42 PM, "James Laszko" wrote:
> Sorry, intended for off-list reply. Sorry for noise.
>
> James
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jun 19, 2015, at 18:37, James Laszko wrote:
> >
> > We have facilities in Chicago and LAX based on Broadsoft technology that
> I think i
Harlan,
This is cisco's recommended workaround, the ultimate conclusion of an
exhaustive study of all Cisco firmware and after detailed post mortem analysis
of two previous Leap seconds:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCut33302
GSS Leap second update
CSCut33302
Description
Symptom:
Th
Sorry, intended for off-list reply. Sorry for noise.
James
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 18:37, James Laszko wrote:
>
> We have facilities in Chicago and LAX based on Broadsoft technology that I
> think is pretty awesome. Would welcome answering any questions for you
>
>
>
We have facilities in Chicago and LAX based on Broadsoft technology that I
think is pretty awesome. Would welcome answering any questions for you
Regards,
James Laszko
Mythos Technology Inc
jam...@mythostech.com
951-813-2674 direct
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 14:43, Rafae
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Sina Owolabi wrote:
> We are profiling equipment and design for an expected high user density
> network of multiple, close nit, residential/hostel units. Its going to be
> 8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time.
Hi Sina,
Quick terminolog
Uhm he's not wrong...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 19, 2015 9:13 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> >>>The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't
> support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off
>>>The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't support
>>>DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz.
Huh
Please verify your facts before making blanket statements which are not
accurate ...
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
- O
> I know you don't want to hear this answer because of cost but I've had
> good luck with Cisco for very high density (about 1,000 clients in a
> packed auditorium actively using the network as they follow along with
> the presenter).
the ietf is repeatedly successful with cisco kit at well over 1
Baldur Norddahl writes:
> On 19 June 2015 at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> > Bad idea.
> >
> > When restarting ntpd your clocks will likely be off by a second, which
> > will cause a backward step, which will force the problem you claim to be
> > avoiding.
>
> If you are afraid that your router
Yes, demanding on your annual contract.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 19, 2015 6:44 PM, "Andrew Duey"
wrote:
> Our Google Apps for ISP's is still up and running. We were told end of
> July for end of service date. I was un
I know you don't want to hear this answer because of cost but I've had good
luck with Cisco for very high density (about 1,000 clients in a packed
auditorium actively using the network as they follow along with the
presenter).
The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't
su
Our Google Apps for ISP's is still up and running. We were told end of
July for end of service date. I was under the impression though that there
were different dates for different customers originally, but I know we're
still up and running on it.
--Andrew
--Andrew Duey
WideRange Broadband LLC
On 19 June 2015 at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Bad idea.
>
> When restarting ntpd your clocks will likely be off by a second, which
> will cause a backward step, which will force the problem you claim to be
> avoiding.
>
If you are afraid that your routers will crash due to the leapsecond, then
BGP Update Report
Interval: 11-Jun-15 -to- 18-Jun-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS23752 276928 3.3%2288.7 -- NPTELECOM-NP-AS Nepal
Telecommunications Corporation, Intern
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 19 21:14:38 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Bad idea.
When restarting ntpd your clocks will likely be off by a second, which
will cause a backward step, which will force the problem you claim to be
avoiding.
There are plenty of ways to solve this problem, and you just get to
choose what you want to risk/pay.
--
Harlan Stenn
http://networ
Saku Ytti writes:
> Hopefully this is last leap second we'll ever see. Non-monotonic time
> is an abomination and very very few programs measuring passage of time
> are correct. Even those which are, usually are not portable, most
> languages do not even offer monotonic time in standard libraries.
Jivetel.com
--Original Message--
From: Rafael Possamai
Sender: NANOG
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: SIP trunking providers
Sent: Jun 19, 2015 17:40
Would anyone in the list be able to recommend a SIP trunk provider in the
Chicago area? Not a VoIP expert, so just looking for someone with pre
Would anyone in the list be able to recommend a SIP trunk provider in the
Chicago area? Not a VoIP expert, so just looking for someone with previous
experience.
Thanks,
Rafael
Mell,
God idea , but , yes we did - no loops all are spokes - we know cabling
and setup our switches and routers to syslog those events.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> Have you done a network analysis for viruses or bridge loops? This could
> be a broadcast storm caused by either of those network fa
Great details !
Going to implement now.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> On 6/19/15 10:57 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
>> Thank You Charles,
>> Been on NANOG a while - all the basic stuff we know well. Like, cables,
>> cluster occurrences etc. Looking for the UniFi specific experience. Its
>> not the switches
re-provisioning is to go to the controller find its config and reboot.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
>
>
>> These two issues alone have caused me major issues with the devices
>> randomly being unable to get new configurations or download firmware
>> updates.
>>
>
> Question. Once they have connecte
This is very helpful information.
We will be implementing these steps.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> On 6/19/15 12:26 PM, char...@thefnf.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>> These two issues alone have caused me major issues with the devices
>>> randomly being unable to get new configurations or download firmware
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:29:34PM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> The universal workaround is to simply disable NTP on your devices sometime
> on Leap-Second eave. This will let the clocks free-run over the one-second
> push, an event of which they will be blissfully ignorant. When you re-enable
>
On 6/19/15 12:26 PM, char...@thefnf.org wrote:
These two issues alone have caused me major issues with the devices
randomly being unable to get new configurations or download firmware
updates.
Question. Once they have connected and are "happy", do they drop off (re
provision) like Bob is me
The universal workaround is to simply disable NTP on your devices sometime on
Leap-Second eave. This will let the clocks free-run over the one-second push,
an event of which they will be blissfully ignorant. When you re-enable NTP
after The Leap, normal, non-destructive, NTP convergence will occ
These two issues alone have caused me major issues with the devices
randomly being unable to get new configurations or download firmware
updates.
Question. Once they have connected and are "happy", do they drop off (re
provision) like Bob is mentioning?
I'm still not entirely sure what is m
On 2015-06-19 11:57, Bob Evans wrote:
Thank You Charles,
Been on NANOG a while - all the basic stuff we know well. Like, cables,
cluster occurrences etc. Looking for the UniFi specific experience. Its
not the switches, power, cables, ports show no CRC issues etc.
Sure. I've seen you around. A
On 6/19/15 10:57 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
Thank You Charles,
Been on NANOG a while - all the basic stuff we know well. Like, cables,
cluster occurrences etc. Looking for the UniFi specific experience. Its
not the switches, power, cables, ports show no CRC issues etc.
We even setup another network wi
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For hi
Have you done a network analysis for viruses or bridge loops? This could be a
broadcast storm caused by either of those network faults.
-mel
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Sam Tetherow wrote:
>
> Only have 1 Pro on my network and it hasn't given me any issues, several of
> the original AP a
Subject: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Date: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:06:22PM -0400
Quoting Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com):
> The IERS will be adding a second to time again on my birthday;
This time around there are a number of Vendor C devices that will fail
in spectacular ways if not upgraded with a p
On (2015-06-19 13:06 -0400), Jay Ashworth wrote:
Hey,
> The IERS will be adding a second to time again on my birthday;
>
> 2015-06-30T23:59:60
Hopefully this is last leap second we'll ever see. Non-monotonic time is an
abomination and very very few programs measuring passage of time are correc
Here is another great document, their Strategic IT Plan
http://www.opm.gov/about-us/budget-performance/strategic-plans/strategic-it-plan.pdf.
I especially like this excerpt from Page 9.
-
Phase 3 – Assess (December 201
Here is a great quote straight out of the OPM budget of 2013.
-
Human Resources Line of Business (HR LOB)
The Human Resources Line of Business (HR LOB) leads the government-wide
transformation of HR Information Technology by focusing
Here is their 2013 budget
https://www.opm.gov/about-us/budget-performance/budgets/2013-budget.pdf
Glancing through it they had a 2.1B total appropriation with 90.5M dedicated to
salaries and expenses where IT would fall. It appears that their CIO also has a
multi-year fund around 70M separately
So you need to wait one more second before you may pop the bottle? :)
On Fri, June 19, 2015 7:06 pm, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> The IERS will be adding a second to time again on my birthday;
>
> 2015-06-30T23:59:59
> 2015-06-30T23:59:60
> 2015-07-01T00:00:00
>
> Have fun, everyone. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> -
Only have 1 Pro on my network and it hasn't given me any issues, several
of the original AP and AP-LR as well without issues.
What is the uptime on the AP? You should be able to ssh into the APs
using the controller username and password. It is a linux base so
'uptime' will tell you. You ca
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:19 PM, James Hartig wrote:
> Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
> 8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolvers that cache and
> have a significant (relatively speaking) user-base? Is the actual percent
> of requests so small tha
The IERS will be adding a second to time again on my birthday;
2015-06-30T23:59:59
2015-06-30T23:59:60
2015-07-01T00:00:00
Have fun, everyone. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Thin
Thank You Charles,
Been on NANOG a while - all the basic stuff we know well. Like, cables,
cluster occurrences etc. Looking for the UniFi specific experience. Its
not the switches, power, cables, ports show no CRC issues etc.
We even setup another network with just 2 and it happens randomly - so
We have all APs set with static addresses. EdgeMax only hands out IPs to
clients using the APs.
This happens when people are using the APs and when no one is even in the
building at 2am when there are no clients connected. It can happen to one
then 5 hours later it happens again...then doesn't ha
The UBNT controller is only required when setting up the APs or for certain
guest portal functions. I'd just leave it connected all of the time.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Origin
> That's possible but I if they are re-provisioning on a regular schedule I
> kind of doubt it. It would be easy to test though. Plug an AP directly
> into your switch with a quality pre-manufactured patch cord and see how it
> acts. If it exhibits the same symptom it is probably not cabling.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> There is an O&M budget created for the day to day operation and maintenance
> of IT systems. This is approved along with your department's budget
> annually. If you classify updating equipment as an O&M function (which it
> routinely i
Wrong. I was a government (US Air Force) network engineer for over 10 years
(not a contractor, a full time employee). There is an O&M budget created for
the day to day operation and maintenance of IT systems. This is approved along
with your department's budget annually. If you classify upda
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> No I intentionally left those out. Here is why. If they would do small
> incremental work, they don’t get into the areas of congressional approval
> and GSA. You can just do the small incremental projects under your IT
> operations budge
The IP can change on the UniFi without having to re-adopt or
re-provision. APs are identified by MAC address at the UniFi protocol
level (not layer 2).
On 06/19/2015 09:09 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
Here is another though. If your APs are re-provisioning every eight hours,
what is your DHCP
I believe, if the fruit is small enough, you could sneak some of this in
through the cracks. Bull it through via sheer determination. But I understand
what you mean The more official it is, the more visible it is, the more
difficult it is The same for any bureaucracy, but a quantum l
No I intentionally left those out. Here is why. If they would do small
incremental work, they don’t get into the areas of congressional approval and
GSA. You can just do the small incremental projects under your IT operations
budgeting. There is a big misconception that everything requires co
I run lots of these. How many APs? Have you reset them to default yet?
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Frequently-Asked-Questions/UniFi-How-do-I-reset-the-UAP-to-factory-default-settings/ta-p/412585
Steve Mikulasik
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Be
This isn't the behavior I've seen with UBNT. They only provision on a change,
even if disconnected for a long time.
You can check this in the UniFi logs directory.
Jared Mauch
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>
> Don't forget to look at your controller because if the con
It sounds like a PoE issue. I'm also happy to take a look. Anything in the
controller logs?
Are your DHCP leases short? Or are you seeing the edge router reboot? What
version on the edge router? The 1.7.0rc2 was posted and compared to 1.5 and 1.6
it fixes a reboot issue I saw unless you disable
Mike,
Good to know they are reliable. It is an odd looking problem.
We will try the forums.
Thank You
Bob Evans
> I've had their gear for a few years now. It's effectively up until I
> upgrade the software. Might want to ask on their forums or on the WISPA
> UBNT list.
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Ha
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Darden, Patrick wrote:
> Good point. It's a massive job, and sometimes it is best to look at those
> piecemeal. Start with small goals, and pick low hanging fruit--your example
> of the server room is good. Set it up with and IDS, a firewall, harden the
> hos
The current ToughCable really is fantastic. I'd only suggest the bigger
one ("carrier"). The old green stuff definitely deterred a lot of people,
understandably.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:05 AM, wr
Mel,
Thanks, for all the detail.
Everything is in doors and directly connected by new 3 to 6 foot
manufactured cables on a cisco switches. All cables have been changed -
even tired crossover cables - same results.
I'm thinking it has something to do with the controller
communications...All these
Thanks Jared
Cables are 3 to 6 feet long - swapped them out already. All cables
manufacture made purchased. They plug into the switch directly. Each
switch is them multi-mode fiber back to a main switch where the edgeMax
router and other gear are connected.
Bob Evans
> I have a variety of the
Do you want to set one of the radios to my Unifi server to confirm it is or
isn't a controller problem?
If you simply turn off your controller you can confirm as well. The
devices will run as provisioned until told otherwise.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Here is another though. If your APs are re-provisioning every eight hours,
what is your DHCP lease time? Are you sure the APs are able to renew their
leases (if not, could your scope be full)? Do you see the IP addresses on the
APs changing when they come back up? These could indicate a DHCP
That's possible but I if they are re-provisioning on a regular schedule I kind
of doubt it. It would be easy to test though. Plug an AP directly into your
switch with a quality pre-manufactured patch cord and see how it acts. If it
exhibits the same symptom it is probably not cabling. Also,
On 2015-06-19 08:51, Mel Beckman wrote:
Bob, I've deployed tons of Ubiquiti gear, and have seen this problem
before. It always turns out to be poor quality cable installation. POE
does not tolerate low quality connectors, especially in outdoor
environments. There are many aspects to a quality ca
On 2015-06-19 05:01, Bob Evans wrote:
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi UAP-PRO Enterprise WiFi System - hard to
recommend
at this point. We saw people mention this brand here on the list -
people
like them. So what could we have set incorrectly ? They drop link and
re-provision on their own at odd times
Good point. It's a massive job, and sometimes it is best to look at those
piecemeal. Start with small goals, and pick low hanging fruit--your example of
the server room is good. Set it up with and IDS, a firewall, harden the hosts
by turning off/removing unused/unneeded services, setting up t
Bob, I've deployed tons of Ubiquiti gear, and have seen this problem before.
It always turns out to be poor quality cable installation. POE does not
tolerate low quality connectors, especially in outdoor environments. There are
many aspects to a quality cabling job, so the best thing you can do
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2015, at 8:12, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:19 AM, James Hartig
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
>>> 8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolv
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> James Hartig wrote:
>>
>> Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
>> 8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolvers that cache and
>> have a significant (relatively speaking) user-base?
>
> http://www.afaste
On 19 June 2015 at 10:39, Mike Meredith wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:51:31 -0400, "Joe Abley"
> may have written:
> > Since DHCP uses broadcast and multicast addresses when a client is
> > discovering a server, it's not obvious why you'd have to.
>
> And broadcast/multicast when renewing a le
On 19 Jun 2015, at 8:12, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:19 AM, James Hartig
wrote:
Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolvers that cache
and
If the client that performs the upstream query
I think one of their major issues is that they look at too much of the network
at a time. If they decided they were going to secure a particular data center
or building, they might be much better off. If they start with defending the
servers from internal as well as external threats and then m
James Hartig wrote:
>
> Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
> 8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolvers that cache and
> have a significant (relatively speaking) user-base?
http://www.afasterinternet.com/ietfdraft.htm
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchh
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:19 AM, James Hartig wrote:
>
> Just curious, how does DNS load balancing work if people are using
> 8.8.8.8/208.67.222.222 or basically any public resolvers that cache and
don't know exactly, but you might get some interesting clues from the
f-root or as112 designs, eh?
What version of the controller are you using, we're running 3.something at that
works fine.
We've turned off auto update on all of the sites on the server, and Nagios
monitors them, we certainly don't see reboots 2-3 times a day, the last time
ours rebooted was when we lost power at our office.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:51:31 -0400, "Joe Abley"
may have written:
> Since DHCP uses broadcast and multicast addresses when a client is
> discovering a server, it's not obvious why you'd have to.
And broadcast/multicast when renewing a lease (DHCPREQUEST). You will
of course see unicast addresses
I've got really great experience with Aruba. Don't know if it fits
your budged, though.
Rebards,
On 19 June 2015 at 08:24, Tyler Mills wrote:
> With that many users I cannot recommend Ubiquiti, Ruckus would be the way
> to go.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:58 AM Sina Owolabi wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>
>
> You can achieve the above DNS trickery using various load balancers that
> other people in this thread have already mentioned. You can also install
> your own geomaps in your own nameservers and handle it yourself, or you can
> buy managed DNS service from various people that can do this kind o
I've had their gear for a few years now. It's effectively up until I upgrade
the software. Might want to ask on their forums or on the WISPA UBNT list.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
-
I have a variety of their gear and don't have problems like this. Have you run
a cable tester on the wiring? This sounds quite odd and is something I haven't
seen.
They do most of their support in their forums vs email. The email is mainly for
RMA support.
What version software is on your co
> 8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time.
Aerohive, easily. AP330s would thrive in a setup such as that.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz
wrote:
> >>> With that many users I cannot recommend Ubiquiti, Ruckus would be the
> way to go.
>
> Really ?
> Consid
On 19 June 2015 at 04:18, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 6/18/2015 16:40, Jonas Björk wrote:
>
> The clients speak unicast with one single ip-helper which address is
>> shared by all the servers.
>> They can't choose which ever server to talk to.
>>
>
> One of us is confused (and it may well be me) b
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi UAP-PRO Enterprise WiFi System - hard to recommend
at this point. We saw people mention this brand here on the list - people
like them. So what could we have set incorrectly ? They drop link and
re-provision on their own at odd times day or night.
We have completed everythi
>>> With that many users I cannot recommend Ubiquiti, Ruckus would be the way
>>> to go.
Really ?
Considering you are referring to Company Names, each with a full product line
of low end to high end products ?
I often remind folks that Chevrolet, makes both the Corvette as well as the
Chevett
Thanks! Everything is still in planning stage, though. Management is
leaning toward Ruckus.
Can I get suggestions for authentication and billing systems for wireless
users too?
Thanks for all the wisdom so far
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:54 AM Bartek Krawczyk
wrote:
> I've got really great experi
87 matches
Mail list logo
