RE: Cisco VSS-1440 migration query

Thanks to all on this. I've pretty much mitigated this by creating a VSS-ized version of the interface configs (chassis/slot/port) which I can then re-inject back into the system config after conversion. Shame that switch1 keeps its config and simply renumbers the interfaces, but switch2 just sa

Re: Any Google Mail admins on the list?

Please tell me if you get any feedback, as far as I know Gmail admins are not more connected to the world than hotmail's. Still, Gmail relies on domainkey/dkim, which could save your day. Mike Lyon a écrit : Howdy All, Trying to resolve a possible Google Mail blockage from a certain domain. W

Re: Hotmail/MSN Issues

That doesn't work that way with them, please check my reply on mailop ml for further information. Cody Appleby a écrit : Can a Hotmail/MSN admin please contact me off-list.

Hotmail/MSN Issues

Can a Hotmail/MSN admin please contact me off-list.

Re: IPv6 Allocations

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Cord MacLeod wrote: > The tool is aware of the prefix length you insert. So instead of /32, put > /64 or /48 etc. Ah! So, the instructions are wrong; instead of saying "1. Enter the start prefix (i.e. 2001:db8::/32)." it should say "1. Enter the start prefix (i

Re: ISP customer assignments

On 20/10/2009, at 3:10 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 03:07:39PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: On 20/10/2009, at 3:02 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: plus want the ability to take their address space with them when they change ISPs (because there are too many devices an

Re: ISP customer assignments

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 03:07:39PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: > On 20/10/2009, at 3:02 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: > > >plus want the ability to take their address > >space with them when they change ISPs (because there are too many > >devices and applications that insist on having hard-coded IP addres

Re: ISP customer assignments

On 20/10/2009, at 3:02 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: plus want the ability to take their address space with them when they change ISPs (because there are too many devices and applications that insist on having hard-coded IP addresses instead of using DNS, and because DNS tends to get cached more often

Re: ISP customer assignments

If you've got an addressing system with enough bits that you don't have to start stealing them, it makes sense to pick some boundary length between our-problem : their-problem 128 bits is long enough, and changing protocols is nasty enough, that it should let you Never Have To Do It

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > I'm told > > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looki

Re: IPv6 Allocations

The tool is aware of the prefix length you insert. So instead of /32, put /64 or /48 etc. On Oct 19, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Simon Perreault < simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> wrote: Esposito, Victor wrote, on 2009-10-19 16:01: Since there is

Re: IPv6 Allocations

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Simon Perreault < simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> wrote: > Esposito, Victor wrote, on 2009-10-19 16:01: > > Since there is a lot of conversation about IPv6 flying about, does > > anyone have a document or link to a good high level allocation structure > > for v6? > >

Re: Science vs. bullshit

Randy's right that it can be somewhat difficult to agree on a single methodology for generating accurate assessments of how many transit providers a particular network uses at a particular moment in time. There are at least two knobs to turn: how long you integrate updates (we like to use at least

Any Google Mail admins on the list?

Howdy All, Trying to resolve a possible Google Mail blockage from a certain domain. Would like to check to see if you are blocking this domain or not. If you are with google and could help, please hit me up off-list. Cheers, Mike

Re: Science vs. bullshit

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > Corner cases like the one above are barely noise, so the curve it > still valid. Strictly speaking, with the subject of "Science vs bullshit", you and msa have named a hypothesis, no? Can either of you think of a way to disprove that, and if so,

Re: Webcasts of NANOG47

Hi Folks, Here's the skinny: Sunday tutorials were not live broadcast, but were recorded, and will be encoded and placed online shortly after the meeting. The General Session from Monday and Tuesday was/will be broadcasted live. Also, Dani Rosiman's talk on Tuesday on the BGP Metric System will

Re: Webcasts of NANOG47

I'd love to! However it's sometimes hard enough getting funds allocated for training events. Industry meetings aren't the easiest thing to convince people to let you attend... :-( Justin Warren Bailey wrote: Or just fly out ;) lol - Original Message - From: Leigh Porter To: Ju

Re: Webcasts of NANOG47

Or just fly out ;) lol - Original Message - From: Leigh Porter To: Justin Shore ; NANOG Sent: Mon Oct 19 14:06:17 2009 Subject: RE: Webcasts of NANOG47 Hey, I don't know for sure but I think only the Grand Room is televised. Get somebody there with a webcam to do ustream.tv or live

RE: Webcasts of NANOG47

Hey, I don't know for sure but I think only the Grand Room is televised. Get somebody there with a webcam to do ustream.tv or livestream.com or whatever ;-) -- Leigh -Original Message- From: Justin Shore [mailto:jus...@justinshore.com] Sent: Mon 10/19/2009 9:06 PM To: NANOG Subject:

RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 21, Issue 72

-Original Message- From: nanog-requ...@nanog.org [mailto:nanog-requ...@nanog.org] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 3:32 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 21, Issue 72 Send NANOG mailing list submissions to nanog@nanog.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World W

2009.10.19 NANOG47 Monday notes, second half

Here's my notes from second half of NANOG today. Now off to bear and gear. :) Matt 2009.10.19 NANOG 47 Monday notes, part 2 Mike Hughes starts things off after lunch at 1436 hours Pacific time. Few bits of administrivia still. If you want to submit a lightning talk, you can do it up until 7

RE: NetFlow analyzer software

Yes my experience was the same on with Manage Engine. Although, they do have an article buried in their archives that shows how to tweak the mysql and java memory settings on start of the app. We found that helped a bit. We were successfully using it for netflows from more than 100Mbps, so I

RE: Cisco VSS-1440 migration query

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:06 -0400, Jason Giles wrote: > >From my test, all physical interfaces configs on switch 2 are factory defaulted and SVI interfaces deleted on switch 2 upon running the conversion commands. When you convert to vss mode the interfaces are renamed. The interface in switch

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

Manage Engine flow receiver with no user sessions viewing statistics runs at 100% CPU for 200+ Mbps unsampled traffic. It's suited to SMBs only. Rubens On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote: > ManageEngine's product is the one that kills browsers because you can tell it >

Re: IPv6 Allocations

On 20/10/2009, at 9:01 AM, Esposito, Victor wrote: Since there is a lot of conversation about IPv6 flying about, does anyone have a document or link to a good high level allocation structure for v6? It seems there are 100 different ways to sub allocate the /32, and I am trying to find a s

Re: IPv6 Allocations

Esposito, Victor wrote, on 2009-10-19 16:01: > Since there is a lot of conversation about IPv6 flying about, does > anyone have a document or link to a good high level allocation structure > for v6? See RFC 3531 and here: http://www.ipv6book.ca/allocation.html Simon -- DNS64 open-source --> h

Webcasts of NANOG47

Does anyone know if there will be video streams of the events from rooms other than what's in the Grand room? For example I would like to see the ISP Security Track BOF or the one tomorrow on Peering. I don't see a way to select those specific feeds though. Thanks Justin

Science vs. bullshit

Lightning talk followup because I want to make sure there was not a miscommunication. A two sentence comment at the mic while 400+ of your not-so-close friends are watching does not a rational discussion make. The talk in question:

IPv6 Allocations

Since there is a lot of conversation about IPv6 flying about, does anyone have a document or link to a good high level allocation structure for v6? It seems there are 100 different ways to sub allocate the /32, and I am trying to find a simple but scalable method... . Thanks! Victor Espos

UPDATE: NANOG 47 PGP signing party.

The second session for the NANOG 47 pgp key signing party will be during the tuesday morning break (11:00 - 11:30) in the Desoto Foyer. If you wish to participate in the pgp keysigning there is still time to add your key to the keyring at: http://biglumber.com/x/web?ev=97301 Then come to the la

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

Try opensource flowtools/FlowViewer. All sorts of reports, graphs, and RRDtool-like long-term series graphs, for AS'es. The flowtools capture/analyzer software can handle high volumes of netflow exports from many exporters. http://ensight.eos.nasa.gov/FlowViewer/ Joe "Michael J McCafferty"

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

ManageEngine's product is the one that kills browsers because you can tell it to list the top X ASNs. --Original Message-- From: Brian R. Watters To: nanog@nanog.org Cc: nanog@nanog.org ReplyTo: Brian R. Watters Subject: RE: NetFlow analyzer software Sent: Oct 19, 2009 10:45 AM We have

RE: NetFlow analyzer software

We have used this product with great success and its reasonable in pricing and well supported. http://www.manageengine.com/products/netflow/index.html BRW -Original Message- From: mark jackson [mailto:markcciejack...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 10:47 AM To: m...@m5compu

RE: NetFlow analyzer software

NetFlow Auditor. The free stuff tends to choke as you add a lot of flow traffic. It's not free, but if you want support this is a great option. http://netflowauditor.com/ -Scott -Original Message- From: Michael J McCafferty [mailto:m...@m5computersecurity.com] Sent: Monday, Oc

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

We currently use nfsen - http://nfsen.sourceforge.net/ -- It works pretty well, not as fancy as others I've worked with, but provides the basic analytical needs. Michael J McCafferty wrote: > All, >I am looking for decent netflow analyzer and reporting software with good > support for AS dat

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

What's up gold Mrtpg Scrtinizer Nagios Riverbed Cascade Solarwinds Sent from my iPhone Please excuse spelling errors On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:43 AM, "Michael J McCafferty" wrote: > All, > I am looking for decent netflow analyzer and reporting software > with good support for AS data. > Manag

Re: NetFlow analyzer software

Not sure if this will get you all the info you are looking for, but it's open source and works well for our needs. http://nfsen.sourceforge.net/ Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com Micha

RE: Cisco VSS-1440 migration query

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:06 -0400, Jason Giles wrote: > >From my test, all physical interfaces configs on switch 2 are factory > >defaulted and SVI interfaces deleted on switch 2 upon running the conversion > >commands. This one is alarming, especially given that there may well be some physical

NetFlow analyzer software

All, I am looking for decent netflow analyzer and reporting software with good support for AS data. ManagEngine's product crashes or locks up my browser when I try to list/sort the AS info because it's too large of a list and there is no way to tell it to show just the top x results.

RE: Cisco VSS-1440 migration query

>From my test, all physical interfaces configs on switch 2 are factory >defaulted and SVI interfaces deleted on switch 2 upon running the conversion >commands. Switch 1 is intact with the new naming convention as well as SVI's. I cannot comment on glbp as I do not run it. /Jason -

Re: Trouble with the rtsp vlc feed?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Will Hargrave wrote: > Joe Maimon wrote: > > Anyone else having trouble with that? > > Not had any luck on either the unicast or multicast RTSP feeds. Flash works > fine, though. > > > For those who had trouble with the feed, I took some notes this morning from th

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

> > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > > I'm told > > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking > > at using > > you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF? I was thinking the same. If you run OSPF and want IPv6 some time in the

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

It wasn't my intention to turn this into a debate of SLAAC vs DHCPv6 but that seems to be what it has become... I agree, SLAAC is the easy way out. I once drank the Kool-Aid and was a "SLAACer" as well. My attitude is that if there is a problem with DHCPv6 support let's fix it, not abandon it.

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm > told > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking > at using you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF? > only area 0. O

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. Yep, OSPF-TE uses Type 10 LSAs, which only has an area flooding scope. > For this reason, we are loo

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:39:40AM -0700, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the > IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this > reason, we are looking at?using only area 0.?Only Loopback interfaces > and p-p core?

Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

Hello, We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking at using only area 0. Only Loopback interfaces and p-p core ethernet links will be in OSPF. What are the maximum number of Routers &

Cisco VSS-1440 migration query

Hi All, Trying to find an answer to a single technical point concerning a migration of a fleet of Catalyst 6500's to VSS-1440. I've had a scan through the documentation on CCO (whitepapers, config guides, migration guides, etc.) but cannot find anything dealing with this one specific point. Bac

Advice about Qwest, Cogent, and Equinix facilities

My company is planning on implementing a new strategy for our web application deployment. My goal is to choose a datacenter/collocation provider who has facilities in the NY and Chicago regions, so that I can have a Primary and DR site connect by at least a 100M line. So far I have identified Qw

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

On Oct 18, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Ray Soucy wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote: My question is this: what are your goals? What are you trying to achieve? As I read this whole thread, I had similar questions coming to mind. The greater concern is that SLAAC mak

Re: Trouble with the rtsp vlc feed?

Joe Maimon wrote: > Anyone else having trouble with that? Not had any luck on either the unicast or multicast RTSP feeds. Flash works fine, though.

Trouble with the rtsp vlc feed?

Anyone else having trouble with that?

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

IPv6 is an opportunity/excuse to make networks make sense - think about what you really want your architecture to be, plan it and start migrating to that. IF that means adding something to v6, great - do it, solve problems. I am not saying "the way we do it know" is always just a bad excuse, b

Quero que você entre no Facebook

Olá na...@merit.edu, Criei um perfil no Facebook com minhas fotos, vídeos e eventos e quero adicionar-lhe aos amigos para que você possa ver meu perfil. Primeiro, você precisa cadastrar-se no Facebook! Uma vez cadastrado, você também poderá criar o seu próprio perfil. Obrigada, Gustavo Para s

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Mark Smith wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:03:12 +0100 Andy Davidson wrote: On 18 Oct 2009, at 01:55, Ray Soucy wrote: The only solution that lets us expand our roll out IPv6 to the edge without major changes to the production IPv4 network seems to point to making use