Re: message duplicated if mailbox written while mutt is opening it

2001-04-15 Thread Tim Legant
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > * Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-15 11:39 +0200: > > Something I've been noticing is that if my MDA (qmail-local from qmail > > 1.03) writes a new message to a mailbox while Mutt (1.2.5i) is in the > > process of opening that

Re: message duplicated if mailbox written while mutt is opening it

2001-04-15 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:03:45AM +, Jim Breton wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:11:46PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote: > > It's a maildir feature that this can't ever happen. > > > > It's a mbox "feature" that you have to use locking to prevent it

Re: converting from mbox to maildir

2001-04-16 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:59:29AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:23:24AM +1000, Tony Collins typed: > > > Thanks for the reply, but I couldn't manage find a 'mbox2maildir' script at > > that site. After searching through the old postings from this list, I did

Re: smtp server config?

2001-04-16 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:24:26PM -0700, Joe Copeland wrote: > How do I configure mutt to use another smtp server rather than the sendmail > server that's setup by default with redhat? I want to use my mailserver at > 192.168.1.15 instead. Mutt (and MUAs on Unix, in general) don't talk to an SM

Re: smtp server config?

2001-04-16 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:37:54PM -0700, Igor Pruchanskiy wrote: > So looks like qmail's advantage of non-root thing is not an advantage anymore, is it >? :)) qmail's security advantage (among many others, IMHO!) is not only that it doesn't run as root: it's that each piece runs as a distinct u

Re: Mutt used to move mbox to maildir format?

2001-04-20 Thread Tim Legant
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:06:57PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote: > from the secret journal of hanasaki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Is there a way to use Mutt to attach to these mbox's and the imap server > > at the sametime and then copy the email / folders into imap? The imap > > server, courier, will

Re: Mail-Followup-To header, where defined?

2001-04-21 Thread Tim Legant
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: > Does anyone of you know which documents describes / defines this > Mail-Followup-To header? Try http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html Tim

Re: maildir update

2001-04-24 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:01:48PM +, Subba Rao wrote: > I have maildir format mailbox. After I read my email from mutt, the maildir/new > directory is not updated until I exit Mutt. Mutt seems to write and update > these directories only when I exit from Mutt. Is there anyway to update the >

Re: Why don't background colors go across the whole screen?

2001-04-26 Thread Tim Legant
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:25:13PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:24:11AM -0700, Hanif Ladha wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:29:31AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > # Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /usr/local/share/terminfo/x/xterm-xfree86 > xterm-xfre

Re: Mailing list From: field in index

2001-04-28 Thread Tim Legant
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:17:56PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote: > I recently added the mailing lists I subscribe to using the > 'subscribe' setting in my muttrc. Apparently, by default, when mutt > recognizes an email from mailing list, it changes the display in the > index to show 'To [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Saving read messages to mbox over IMAP

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:21:11AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote: > Ok, this is what I have now: > > set spoolfile={bignachos.com}INBOX > set folder={bignachos.com}Mail > set mbox="=mbox" > mbox-hook "$spoolfile" "$mbox" > > But mutt still acts the same. Did I get that syntax right? Did you forget

Re: Maildir folder summaries, hashes, etc.

2001-05-02 Thread Tim Legant
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:19:29PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote: > There are a couple things that I wish mutt could do: > > 1. Build a hash index of all of the info displayed in the index so it doesn't > have to scan every file in the maildir (or read the whole mbox for those using > mbox) every tim

Re: How to specify the current folder in a folder-hook?

2001-05-03 Thread Tim Legant
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote: > I don't know if that's possible. It guess mutt would need to set some > kind of local variable to use later in that command and then discard. > I was thinking about something similar recently. I normally save my > mail in individua

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-04 Thread Tim Legant
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:28:09PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Mr. Wade muttered: > > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it. > > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work, > > > but list-reply key works in both lists

Re: How to specify the current folder in a folder-hook?

2001-05-05 Thread Tim Legant
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote: > I missed that post - I've only been using mutt (and subscribed to the > list) for a few days, but that sounds like the kind of thing I want. > Unfortunately when I add this line to .muttrc then run mutt and hit > `s' on an email with

Re: strange config problem (1.2.5i)

2001-05-06 Thread Tim Legant
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:19:16PM +0200, Arnaud S . Launay wrote: > I want to have something like that: > > mailboxes ! \ > +amazon \ > #+announces \ > +arrivees > > in order to add/and delete viewing folders, with them classified > by alpha order. > > problem is, parsing mailboxes stops after

Re: MailDir vs. mbox (was: Re: vfolders)

2001-07-14 Thread Tim Legant
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:42:03AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach »Walt Mankowski« am 2001-07-13 um 19:04:43 -0400 : > > Maildirs have some neat advantages of their own. For example it's > > very easy to merge two folders together. I send mail from my laptop, > > Hmm, dunno, but I f

Re: MailDir vs. mbox (was: Re: vfolders)

2001-07-15 Thread Tim Legant
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote: > > Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs. > > If procmail correctly followed the specification for maildirs, > >