* E. Prom [2012-02-04 19:23 -0500]:
> How can I make mutt to save outgoing mail to the currently opened
> mailbox?
Try the following (from my muttrc):
#v+
folder-hook . "set record=^"# sent mail gets saved in current mailbox
#v-
> I tried several hooks, but none accepted the sequence "%b" (
* Diep Pham Van [2012-05-10 12:07 -0400]:
> I have many folders start with [Gmail]. :)
Have you tried hitting 'c', then '-', then enter? That takes you to
your last visited folder.
Regards,
--
dave [ please don't CC me ]
pgpGQ58bPvUSJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Cameron Simpson [2012-05-12 20:26 -0400]:
> On 12May2012 19:10, Jim Graham wrote:
> > Any other thoughts on Mutt + Mac OS X welcome, either here or via
> > direct e-mail (using the list is probably better, as it's already
> > whitelisted in procmail).
>
> I use the mutt from MacPorts (WELL wor
* Cameron Simpson [2012-05-13 19:55 -0400]:
> I do like the install approach brew uses - I used the type of same
> scheme myself at a former workplace to build third party packages for
> the workstations there:
>
> http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/css/syncopt.html
Interesting... I've never h
* Linda [2012-11-14 00:04 -0500]:
> I use dovecot with Maildir for the imap server. I can view the inbox fine
> but can't access or list the subdirectories
I assume you can with other IMAP clients, right?
> Here is the .muttrc lines that would be relevant
>
> set spoolfile=imap://office-mail@s
* Will Fiveash [2013-01-10 18:49 -0500]:
> What I'd like is a way to temporarily "pull in" a subthread so I can
> see the threading. To put it another way, make some message that's
> the parent of a subthread look like the parent of the entire thread
> causing mutt to hide the rest of the entire
* Will Fiveash [2013-01-11 12:35 -0500]:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:12:01PM -0500, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> >
> > Hrm... have you tried a combination of '' and
> > ''?
> >
> That is close but not exactly what I'm looking for. The
* Marco [2013-01-13 07:17 -0500]:
> How do I correctly set a default address which does not break
> reverse_name?
Try using "set from=u...@example.com" instead of my_hdr.
See section 3.75 in TFM.
Regards,
--
dave [ please don't CC me ]
pgpe4uMBj9fU2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Marco [2013-01-13 11:13 -0500]:
> On 2013–01–13 David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
>
> > * Marco [2013-01-13 07:17 -0500]:
> > > How do I correctly set a default address which does not break
> > > reverse_name?
> >
> > Try using "set from=u...@examp
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2013-01-11
12:44 -0500]:
> * Will Fiveash [2013-01-11 12:35 -0500]:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:12:01PM -0500, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hrm... have you tried a combination of '' and
> > > ''?
&
* Marco [2013-01-13 11:57 -0500]:
> what does the star in the index view of a thread represent?
>
> ├─>
> ├─>
> │ └─>
> │ └─>
> └*> <--- this is what I'm talking about
> └─>
>
> It's probably explained somewhere in the manual, but frankly, I have
> no clue what to search for.
I couldn't
* Will Fiveash [2013-01-14 14:22 -0500]:
> Indeed, with hide_top_limited=yes I can limit the display of a
> subthread in the desired way. I'm now using this index macro:
>
> macro index "_S" "~T\n" "Display only
> subthread"
>
> with hide_top_limited=yes in my .muttrc. Thanks for posting that
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
> > ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> > >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > >'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
>
> is there a way to add the '\n' there?
I didn't find a way to add the '\n', inst
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> now that is what i'm talking about. great stuff, thanks.
You're welcome.
> and this to hooks:
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> set autoedit=yes
> my_hdr To:'
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> and this to hooks:
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> set autoedit=yes
> my_hdr To:'
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
By the way, you may want to check your hooks thoroughly, as a second
addres
* Chris Green [2014-12-08 17:09 -0500]:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local mail spool.
I stopped using IMAP directly a while ago, and started using offli
After much frustration I discovered why mutt wouldn't work with the
SMIME keys issued at work: there are two of the private keys (one for
signature, one for encryption), and a single public key. As I have an
employer that is more than willing to let me use mutt (if I can get it
to work properly)
[Apologies to Kevin and Bernard: the first email went to their
individual email accounts but was supposed to go to the list.]
It is evident from the answers that I need to review the how to ask
questions the smart way page [1], but I've solved the problem (although
the solution is not elegant).
* Dave Dodge [2015-04-04 18:30 -0400]:
Some formal key infrastructures managed by corporations, government
departments, etc. will issue you two distinct private keys, each with
its own X.509 certificate. One is only to be used for digital
signatures, and the other is only to be used for data en
* Brian Salter-Duke [2015-04-05 16:35 -0400]:
While you are fixing these problems, could one of you look at a problem
I reported a few weeks ago.
Hrm... what's the ticket number? I just checked and couldn't find the
bug report.
http://www.kurokatta.org/hacks/src/mutt-1.5.13-rmattach.patc
* Joe [2015-08-25 09:32 -0400]:
2- I'd like to isolate a whole thread from the rest of messages/threads
opening it in a new clean screen containing just that thread.
Same behaviour of "tin" newsreader:
- topics of a newsgroup are listed one per line
So this would be threads collapsed to
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years
now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue.
I have all my sent email saved in the current mailbox. I do this using
the following setting in my muttrc (per
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/wikis/MuttFaq/Folde
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2018-04-25 21:38 -0400]:
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years
now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue.
#v+
folder-hook . "set record=^"
#v-
Sigh... apparently inspiration required that I sen
* boB Stepp [2021-02-08 15:44 -0500]:
...
I have setup a crontab job (My first ever!) to run mbsync every five
minutes. Mutt checks the local mail much more frequently. Probably
should make this a similar time interval to the crontab interval. I
was concerned that if there were to be a network
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 22:21 +0100]:
> So the question is how to proceed. The following options are
> available:
>
> 1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
> 2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
> 3) Do 1 + 2
>
> Opinions?
3)
Perhaps I'm looking for a feature that doesn't exist, and I'm almost
certainly missing something simple, but here's the background:
I currently use a script to connect to my IMAP server, and get a list of
all mail folders. I then parse that list to get the mailing list
folders (all named list.mai
* Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-29 19:12 +0200]:
> Am 2007-08-24 23:49:36, schrieb David J. Weller-Fahy:
> > Perhaps I'm looking for a feature that doesn't exist, and I'm almost
> > certainly missing something simple, but here's the backg
27;s a better way to do what I want to do, again. ;]
Regards,
--
David J. Weller-Fahy| 'These are the questions that kept me out
largely at innocent dot com | of the really *good* schools.'
www dot weller-fahy dot com | - One of The Group
* Nathan Huesken [2009-02-19 05:04 -0600]:
> I really like the thread sorted view of mutt. But I would like a
> little change: I would like the threads not to be sorted by the date
> of the first mail but by the date if the most recent mail...
>
> Is this possible?
Here's what I have in my muttrc
* Zhengquan Zhang [2009-04-21 19:58 -0500]:
> I accidentally used 'd' on a message and can not go back to it. I
> tried to use arrow keys to go back to it and use 'u' to undelete it
> but it just failed to do so.
>
> I have 'set delete=yes' in muttrc. So once I quit mutt, the message
> will be au
* Chris Jones [2009-04-21 21:26 -0500]:
> Nobody I know is able to hit by accident.
My cat can... wait, I'm assuming he does that on accident... hrm. ;)
--
dave [ please don't CC me ]
* Kyle Wheeler [2009-04-23 12:01 -0500]:
> > I'm using it since a few days (no imap, only local Maildir), no
> > problem so far.
>
> I've been using it for a few days now too, with IMAP only, and it
> seems to work fine for me.
I have been using it, IMAP only as well, since the 18th of April, and
* Rocco Rutte [2009-04-28 05:02 -0500]:
> It would be nice if you could keep an eye on database file sizes. If
> the db libraries don't reuse freed space (either by deleted or updated
> entries), then we get a growing db file.
I'm running HEAD with your patch, and am running the following command
First, my goal is to change the from variable based on which mailing
list mailbox I'm in (my non-list email addresses don't change enough to
make this worthwhile for them). I was using a one-line patch to export
the mailbox name to the shell. With your solution that should no longer
be necessary,
* Noah Sheppard [2009-05-02 01:56 -0500]:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:28:39PM -0500, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > Right now everything works except from never gets set. I thought
> > this might be because of the timing (source happening before the
> > link is creat
* Cameron Simpson [2009-05-02 23:19 -0500]:
> On 02May2009 14:55, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
> | I get two results that I did not expect.
> | 1) I get the "any key" prompt after the shell command executes.
> | 2) my_revdir is not filled with the current folder name.
Before I get into inline response - this works for me: Thanks Cameron!
* Cameron Simpson [2009-05-12 03:27 -0500]:
> On 04May2009 22:25, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
[ ... snip-o-lot throughout ... ]
> | So, really the only problem I need to solve to make everything work
> | witho
* Cameron Simpson [2009-05-26 18:20 -0500]:
> On 25May2009 22:30, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
[ ... snips ... ]
> | Brought a tear to my eye! I just spent ~30 minutes trying to trim
> | away the macro, but I have not been able to yet. I'm sure my
> | understanding of m
* Cameron Simpson [2009-05-31 01:41 -0500]:
> On 30May2009 22:20, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
> | #v+
> | folder-hook . 'push ":\\\`~/.mutt/listbox-to-email.pl\
> $my_folder\\\`"'
> | #v-
> |
> | I do not understand why the macro is required to f
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2009-05-31
21:30 -0500]:
> folder-hook +lists* 'set my_oldrecord=$record; set record=^; set
> my_folder=$record; set record=$my_oldrecord'
^^^
That should have been '.', but you get the idea.
And the script is attached... it
* Cameron Simpson [2009-06-03 23:56 -0500]:
> On 31May2009 21:29, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
> | * Cameron Simpson [2009-05-31 01:41 -0500]:
> [...big snip...]
> | As you suggested, I changed the \\\` to \`, and voilà! It works without
> | the macro! I can only plead
* Cameron Simpson [2009-07-11 19:37 -0500]:
> On 10Jul2009 13:48, Nicolas Rachinsky
> wrote:
> | * Rocco Rutte [2009-07-10 13:44 +0200]:
> | > I don't know if I mentioned this already, but I think I once
> | > hacked support for read-only variables in mutt-ng that would
> | > expose certain int
A little eye-surgery and suddenly you appreciate being to ready email.
;)
[snips throughout]
* Cameron Simpson [2009-06-26 16:40 -0500]:
> On 25Jun2009 23:50, David J. Weller-Fahy
> wrote:
> | * Cameron Simpson [2009-06-03 23:56 -0500]:
> | > folder-hook . "macro inde
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2009-07-21
23:30 -0500]:
> A little eye-surgery and suddenly you appreciate being to ready email.
"being to ready" = "being able to read"
Probably appreciate being able to proof-read, too... grumble.
--
dave [ please don't CC me ]
* Todd Zullinger [2009-11-27 21:07 -0500]:
> If you call check-traditional-pgp on this message, is this text lost?
> It is for me and I would call it a bug. It might also be some subtle
> difference between our configurations, gpg versions, etc.
FWIW I copied your message into ~/test, and then o
* Michael Wagner [2009-11-29 07:59 -0500]:
> * martin f krafft 29.11.2009
> > This *could* be due to gnupg. Do you see the unsigned portions of
> > the text if you run
> >
> > gpg < ~/test
I do *not* see the text preceding the digitally signed portion of the
message when I run `gpg < ~/test`.
* E. Prom [2010-01-20 23:04 -0400]:
> Ideally, I would then just "source `external_program`", where
> external_program returns the name of a mutt conf file changing all
> these variables.
>
> [snips]
>
> My problem is that I need to pass this external_program the address
> I'm writing to. And of c
* Derek Martin [2011-02-27 18:11 -0800]:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:34:43PM -0600, Puneet Kishor wrote:
> > There is much that I have to do to really get comfortable with mutt, but
> > I think I am making slow but steady progress. One feature that really
> > bothers me because of its absence is
* Derek Martin [2011-03-15 09:42 -0500]:
> Actually, do either of these last two messages (this one, and the one
> I'm replying to) verify correctly? I upgraded OpenSSL, and now I see
> this:
>
> $ gpg --list-packets foo4.txt
> :signature packet: algo 17, keyid 1C49C048DFBEAD02
> version
49 matches
Mail list logo