* Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> [2009-11-27 21:07 -0500]:
> If you call check-traditional-pgp on this message, is this text lost?
> It is for me and I would call it a bug.  It might also be some subtle
> difference between our configurations, gpg versions, etc.

FWIW I copied your message into ~/test, and then opened it using the
latest tip, and the following command-line.

#v+
mutt -n -F usr/share/doc/mutt/samples/gpg.rc -f ~/test
#v-

I then entered ':exec check-traditional-pgp' in mutt, and viewed the
message.  The text preceding the digitally signed portion of the message
was still visible.

My mutt is:

#v+
Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-10-28)
Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.

System: Darwin 10.2.0 (i386)
ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20081102 (compiled with 5.7)
libiconv: 1.11
hcache backend: tokyocabinet 1.4.35
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
+DEBUG
+HOMESPOOL  -USE_SETGID  +USE_DOTLOCK  -DL_STANDALONE  +USE_FCNTL
-USE_FLOCK
-USE_POP  +USE_IMAP  +USE_SMTP
+USE_SSL_OPENSSL  -USE_SSL_GNUTLS  +USE_SASL  -USE_GSS
+HAVE_GETADDRINFO
+HAVE_REGCOMP  -USE_GNU_REGEX
+HAVE_COLOR  +HAVE_START_COLOR  +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD  +HAVE_BKGDSET
+HAVE_CURS_SET  +HAVE_META  +HAVE_RESIZETERM
+CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP  +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME
-CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME
-EXACT_ADDRESS  -SUN_ATTACHMENT
+ENABLE_NLS  -LOCALES_HACK  +HAVE_WC_FUNCS  +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET
+HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR
+HAVE_ICONV  -ICONV_NONTRANS  -HAVE_LIBIDN  +HAVE_GETSID  +USE_HCACHE
-ISPELL
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="Maildir"
PKGDATADIR="/Users/dave/usr/share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/Users/dave/usr/etc"
EXECSHELL="/bin/sh"
-MIXMASTER
To contact the developers, please mail to <mutt-...@mutt.org>.
To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/.
#v-

I seem to recall this being brought up previously on the mailing list,
but can't find any reference (which may mean it is all in my head).
I'll keep searching, but haven't found anything about this particular
problem yet.

JADP.

Regards,
-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]

Attachment: pgpoGNubLzcgO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to