Filtering messages.

2000-07-18 Thread Caster
Hi! I want to make myself kind of "template" for writing mails. I think the best way would be a filter, that could put some text in a new mail. The filter is not a problem, but I wonder how to call it automatically within Mutt (when I tell Mutt to open my favourite vim :) to edit a message, but of

Re: Filtering messages.

2000-07-18 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On wto 18 lip 2000 06:29:01 GMT David T-G wrote: > Aren't hooks great? :-) Yes, they surely are :) > although the possibility of a macro springs to mind. Can send-hook call macros? -- Bi-la kaifa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Verifying signatures and other (problems?) with GPG

2000-07-18 Thread Caster
I have noticed a bit annoying behaviour when I set the automatic verify of PGP signatures. It's because the screen is not refreshed after that. The worst is when I don't have someone's key in my keyring: I see two status bars then :( When I got the desired key, it's just one "S" instead of "-" on

Re: Filtering messages.

2000-07-19 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On wto 18 lip 2000 14:27:46 GMT David T-G wrote: > I don't *think* so, but you could specify a push command and push the > macro keystrokes... Well, that should work. Thanks for the tip :) -- Bi-la kaifa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mailing to multiple addresses

2000-07-19 Thread Caster
Hi! I was searching for a simple addressbook that could work with Mutt. I have found one -- it's called abook. It's almost OK, I can simply query it for an e-mail address. However there is one problem: I can't mail to multiple addresses at once. I can ask abook for a pattern or for 'all' and Mutt

Re: Mailing to multiple addresses

2000-07-19 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On śro 19 lip 2000 13:26:42 GMT Bob Bell wrote: > Use ';' before the command (e.g. ';m') to have the command apply > to all tagged records. Thanks :) I should read doc first -- sorry. -- Bi-la kaifa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Screen doesn't refresh when using gpg

2000-07-24 Thread Caster
I asked this before but nobody answered. When I use gpg functions the screen doesn't refresh after calling it. If I press the refresh screen sequence (^L by default) everything is alright -- screen backs to normal. Is this a known bug? Does it occure in your mailers? -- Bi-la kaifa mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Screen doesn't refresh when using gpg

2000-07-25 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 24 lip 2000 15:17:24 GMT Charles Curley wrote: > Possibly you have a termcap problem Well, I think I don't. All other things work great. > or else mutt is sending the wrong > sequence of control characters to your terminal program. It looks like mutt doesn't call the r

Re: Screen doesn't refresh when using gpg

2000-07-26 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On wto 25 lip 2000 07:15:55 GMT David T-G wrote: > I get the same thing with mutt-1.2.4i and gnupg 1.0.1 I see you're using gpg 1.0.2 now and so do I. However, I'm happy now because I found where the problem was. I filled the pgp_getkeys_command, but I was offline when Mutt inv

Re: Screen doesn't refresh when using gpg

2000-07-27 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On śro 26 lip 2000 12:15:43 GMT David T-G wrote: > set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring > pubring.catch-all-keys.gpg %r" Mine looks similar, so that's not problem. It's the unexpected output or return value when an error (can't coonect to keyserver because I'm

[OT] Keyservers

2000-08-02 Thread Caster
Sorry for the offtopic. Anyway my question is: what pgp keyservers do you use? I searched some www pages, but couldn't find any real keyservs index. -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] Keyservers

2000-08-03 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On śro 02 sie 2000 19:14:19 GMT Drew Bloechl wrote: > $ host -l pgp.net | grep wwwkeys > > and pick one in or near your country. Personally I use > wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net since wwwkeys.us.pgp.net seems to frequently be down. I thought that wwwkeys are web-based only and didn't

PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-07 Thread Caster
My friend uses PGP 6.x and The Bat. Unfortunately Mutt doesn't recognize that a message from him is signed. There is a recipe in the FAQ, but it doesn't work in this case. The recipe begins with: :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp In his

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-07 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 10:12:27 GMT David T-G wrote: > Rather than that I'd create another recipe I was thinking about that but it's slow. > (or dig back into the docs to > figure out how to OR it into the first) to at least match on It would be the best but it's impossible :( Of

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-07 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 13:21:59 GMT David T-G wrote: > You mean slow for you to write for every user like this, or slow for > procmail to process because it's another recipe to check? As you know (after reading the very end of my previous mail) I mean slow for procmail :) > I can

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-07 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 13:21:59 GMT David T-G wrote: > That's what I thought you said. Interesting. Maybe this will interest you. I think the recipe in the PGP-Notes is wrong. Let's say someone sends me a message with an enclusore. He is also using PGP and signs the message. There

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 17:33:40 GMT Aaron Schrab wrote: > I suspect that that's what's happening in this case, since the example > message (which had Content-Type: text/plain) got modified by my procmail > rules and mutt successfully checked the signature. Yes, that's it and that's

Indent_string

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
Can anybody tell me why this doesn't work: set indent_string=`for x in %n; do echo $x | cut -c 1; done;` Normally (when I run it manually from the shell) it works fine (of course when I replace %n with some words). -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Indent_string

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On wto 08 sie 2000 17:43:40 GMT Caster wrote: > Can anybody tell me why this doesn't work: > set indent_string=`for x in %n; do echo $x | cut -c 1; done;` Of course I forgot about send-hook so it just couldn't work... Eh... -- lamest Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 20:07:21 GMT Thomas Roessler wrote: > Could you forward a complete message to this list, including all > relevant headers, and the nested MIME stuff? Wel, here it goes. I don't think it can be useful, because now I know why the problems occurs (because his me

Re: PGP6 & The Bat

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On wto 08 sie 2000 20:28:16 GMT Thomas Roessler wrote: > Yep... When I originally saw your note about multipart/mixed with > PGP nessages, I speculated about a broken attempt to implement > PGP/MIME, but this is just a MUA being creative and attaching the > public key to messag

Reply_indent once more

2000-08-08 Thread Caster
After some tries I found that my idea won't work :( Mutt doesn't evaluate %n before sending it to a program so that programs receives just "%n". There is now way to easily change this behaviour, I suppose? -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-09 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On śro 09 sie 2000 16:30:24 GMT Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote: > Then I have changed "set editor" line in my .muttrc to the path to the > shell script. Well, I found that %s in $editor expands to the filename containing the message, so you can use just something like: set editor="

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-10 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On czw 10 sie 2000 07:35:56 GMT David T-G wrote: > It's a valid escape sequence, and I think I've heard of it before. It > might not, however, be fully documented :-) In fact I don't see any mention of it in the docs (I mean in refer to the name of the edited file). > You can

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-11 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pią 11 sie 2000 00:19:09 GMT Peter Palfrader wrote: > set editor="vim +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\` %s" Even more clever :) -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-11 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pią 11 sie 2000 02:40:18 GMT Michael Tatge wrote: > It's there: > > 5.3.3.3. Command Expansion Well, I missed it. Maybe because I always look for such things in the "Configuration variables" section :) -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP signature

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-11 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pią 11 sie 2000 11:30:03 GMT Kai Blin wrote: > We don't want Mutt to become something like StarOffice (can do anything, but > poorly), do we? I agree but it's just a very little thingie :) This isn't a html viewer. Look at tin -- is it like Star Office? -- Tomasz Olszewsk

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-13 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On sob 12 sie 2000 16:05:27 GMT iain truskett wrote: > Clever, but only useful if your vi clone doesn't support something like: > set editor="vim +/^$/+1" Notice, that moving the cursor to the line that comes exactly after the first blank line is no what I want. I need vi to

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-13 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On nie 13 sie 2000 18:57:31 GMT iain truskett and Christian Schult wrote: >set editor="vim -c \":normal 2/^$/^M\" %s" Tkanks :) I didn't know of ^M. > That's for vim. My brain hurts doing it for vi all in vi, so your awk > solution works there =) In fact it's not mine sol

The editor variable

2000-08-14 Thread Caster
Hi! Why something like this doesn't work: set editor=`if test $DISPLAY ; then echo gvim -c ":normal 2/^$/" +nohlsearch %s ; else echo vim -c ":normal 2/^$/" +nohlsearch %s ; fi` It's all in one line. Mutt complains about unknown -c option (!). I've tried to quote it and escape it somehow but it

Re: The editor variable

2000-08-15 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pon 14 sie 2000 11:13:40 GMT Michael Elkins wrote: > It sets $editor to gvim and then tries to set > the variable -c, which of course does not exist. Oh, I see. I wrote a shell script which I set as my $editor (set editor="my_script") and it works (the script calls the edito

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

2000-08-12 Thread Caster
Hello Mutt Users! On pią 11 sie 2000 07:36:37 GMT David T-G wrote: > Nah; I still like finding a way to let your editor, perhaps with help > from other tools, do it for you. Let mutt decide whether or not to > attach your signature and leave it at that. Well, maybe you're right. Altough such fe