Hello Mutt Users!
On pon 07 sie 2000 13:21:59 GMT David T-G wrote:
> You mean slow for you to write for every user like this, or slow for
> procmail to process because it's another recipe to check?
As you know (after reading the very end of my previous mail) I mean slow
for procmail :)
> I can certainly understand the frustration of having specific procmail
> rules for each correspondent
Well, I didn't even think of something like that. It has to be user
independent.
> My collection of included
> rules files currently has (hmmm ... counts ":0" occurences ...) something
> like 247 recipes
^^^
Jeez! It really is a BIG procmailrc :)
> (some nested) and my mail delivery certainly seems to
> go pretty quickly. I admit that even I don't worry too much if it takes
> an extra second or two for mail to land in a mailbox, since I'm probably
> answering another when it arrives anyway :-)
I don't think some new recipes could _really_ slow down procmail.
However I like my scripts and other things to be as fast, simple and small
as possible. Sometimes even paranoic :) However I don't see any other
easy solution. I think I'll have to add another recipe. Hope it'll work
:)
THX for replying.
--
Tomasz Olszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
