> Well, I think mines longest so far but like Knute I downloaded and then
> modified. (That's kinda like an artificial extension or implants: Just
> as impressive visually but we all know they're fake!)
> Weighing in at a whopping 2036 not counting aliases.
I wonder if all the very long .muttrc
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:45:30PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote
> Getting needed keys from a keyserver is completely a function of
> your pgp/gpg program... the keyserver line is all that's needed if
> you're using gpg. (Well, it works for verifying sigs anyway... I've
Fine, but IIRC that on
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:15:33PM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote
> You could try adding
> set edit_headers
> to your .muttrc and edit the subject inside vim.
Thanks, yes, that is a way, but I thought mutt had its own way for
doing this because it handles utf8 very well.
Shade and sweet water!
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
These releases both fix a security hole which can be remotely
exploited. The problem was foun
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:44:17PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> ...and then Hanspeter Roth said...
>
> % Maybe once when I think I can't explore anymore usefull in mutt, I
> % might look at pine.
>
> Many here would grin widely at that and tell you the day will never come!
Never mind!
-Hanspet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
and i can't find it in the manual.
er, help?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 11:20
* Nick Wilson said
> Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
>
> fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
>
> and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
> and i can't find it in the manual.
>
> er, help?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
:error sending message, child exited 67 (User unkown)
Hmmm.. What's all that about then?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingne
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-10 20:15]:
> Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > > macro index d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > >
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:04 +0100, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
>
> :error sending message, child exited 67 (User unkown)
-- imho, that's MTA report.
10x, karlov.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:40:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Of course :-)
> What about the workaround of sending a probe and waiting to see if that
> bounces, perhaps having sent it after a delay?
that would involve intelligence, and something more than majordomo
does at the moment.
Steve
--
Mike, et al --
...and then mike ledoux said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
% > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
% > > > Wow. You have a 462+ line .muttrc?
% > >
% > > come on, who
Dan --
While you're setting up your editor, would you mind terribly asking it to
wrap lines (insert line breaks) at around 72 chars?
...and then dan radom said...
%
% Is it possible to create a macro that can be used when composing an email? I like
to trim my emails as much as possible, and
Michael --
...and then Michael Maibaum said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:00:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Michael Maibaum said...
% > %
% > % obbsessive sense of tidieness I would like to move them to a subdir
% > % called outbox/
...
% > Use the %O expando (that's an o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:19
* boris karlov said
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:04 +0100, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
> >
> > :error sending message, child exi
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all,
% can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
% %_patch?
I get this all the time. Someone suggested a way to work around it, but
I've neither looked into it yet nor even retained the pointer :-(
%
% Here it is..
Hi, all --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
%
% Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:54:49 -0800 (PST)
%
...
% mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
was PGP-MIME signed,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:32:24AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
> Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
> Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
> was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:34
* David T-G said
> ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> %
> % Hi all,
> % can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
> % %_patch?
>
> I get this all the time. Someone suggested a way to work a
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
>
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
> This is quoted text: >
> This is quot
Viktor --
...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
%
% [CC'd to mutt-dev b/c of attached patch, I'm not on mutt-dev, so please
% CC me in replies]
I trust that's not required for mutt-users...
%
% Cristian wrote:
%
% > What has confused a few people is the fact that the patch is effective
% > o
Thank you, Chris. I'm glad to see/use your script with my mutt. Please
post it.
I've ever thought to leave a mark for 'receipt-sent' in the header with
a specific field (say, X-Receipt) or some common field. But it looks
making management of mbox complicated. Your marking strategy should be
bette
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
> Charles Jie wrote:
> > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> > programs.
>
> But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just rea
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
>
> > Well, I think mines longest so far but like Knute I downloaded and then
> > modified. (That's kinda like an artificial extension or implants: Just
> > as impressive visually but we all know they're fake!)
> > Weighing in at a whopping 2036 no
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Mike, et al --
>
> ...and then mike ledoux said...
> %
> % On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> % > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> % > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
> % > > > Wow.
Why does signal an error when the mailbox is empty?
Shouldn't it just be a no-op?
The error foils these macros:
macro index y "?"
macro pager y "?"
Thanks,
Sam
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
>
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text: > somewhat diffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Anh Lai hath spake thusly:
> How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
>
> apparently David only uses this, and i would like to learn how to add %
> as a quote indicator.
Hmm.. well, speaking for m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
> At some point hitherto, Anh Lai hath spake thusly:
> > How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
> >
> > apparently David only uses this, and i would like to lea
Thank you, Boris.
But that's weird for your case. If you have attachment, your header
should have only 'Content-Type: multipart/...' instead of 'text/plain'
or 'text/html'.
For my cases, they have the latter content-type and no attachment. They
send me inline 8-bit muitibyte (big5) text. Mutt wi
Hello!
Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
this one:
folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
when no messages are tagged (since no old messages are in the folder),
the message
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% Hello!
Hi!
%
% Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
% this one:
% folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
%
% But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
% when n
Knute --
...and then Knute said...
%
% On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > ...and then mike ledoux said...
% > %
% > % On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > % > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
% > % > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samue
On Freitag, 11. Jan. 2002 at 16:11:54, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
> this one:
> folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
>
> But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
> when no mess
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:05:19 +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, Boris.
>
> But that's weird for your case. If you have attachment, your header
> should have only 'Content-Type: multipart/...' instead of 'text/plain'
> or 'text/html'.
-- but every attachment has its own `C
On Jan 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Thomas Roessler said...
> %
> % Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:54:49 -0800 (PST)
> %
> ...
> % mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
>
> Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
> Jan 01 me
I had the same problem an used:
charset-hook "" iso-8859-1
I think you can use:
charset-hook "" big5
This will match any message without 'charset' specified.
Hope this helps
[]'s
- Cristiano
Em Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Charles Jie escreveu:
> In our country, I used to receive messages without 'c
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't know what you mean but I've fixed it. It was a silly error
> I'd made. It's just one of those days.
Can you tell us what was wrong and how you fixed it (just in case
we ever run into the same problem)?
Thanks,
Sam
I sometimes spell check my messages before I send them using
Ispell (actually, Aspell), and often I have no errors. When this
is the case, however, Mutt does not indicate that the spell
checker ran at all! Is there any way I can tell Mutt to display a
message, for instance, "Ispell exited with r
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% >
% > Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
% > Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
% > was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's
On 08/12/01 Brian Clark did speaketh:
> * Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 16:35]:
>
> > When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
> > immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
> > email until they set one
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text:
This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
On 2002-01-11 01:54:49 -0800, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
> It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
Looks like someone re-injected. Next time I'll check more carefully.
Sorry (also can't find any tryme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 17:29
* Samuel Padgett said
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Don't know what you mean but I've fixed it. It was a silly error
> > I'd made. It's just one of those days.
>
> Can you tell us what was wrong and ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
Currently I delete all the mail I no longer wish to see in my mailboxes
and it gets sent to ~/Mail/Trash
All well and good.
I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
the other rubbish to make it easier to searc
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
> From: "J. Scott Dorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
>
> Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via shift-v or some
> such) then ':s/^/This is
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
> Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat option listed. But, if I put
> it in my .muttrc, Mutt doesn't complain. Should I file a bug report with
> Debian that the manual is out of da
Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
>
> Just wondered how you good people did this?
if you have the Trash patch applied, you can do something like this:
folder-hook . se
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
> Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
> only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
> abort the macro if there aren't. You can get it from
>
> http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again!
I'm having a problem posting to another list. I get this from time to
time on various addresses and in various situations.
All of my mail is grabbed by fetchmail and sorted by procmail and then
read by mutt.
In my muttrc I have set the ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 18:52
* Will Yardley said
> Nick Wilson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> > the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
> >
> > Just wondered how you good peopl
Michael --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% On 08/12/01 Brian Clark did speaketh:
%
...
% > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
% > set pgp_outlook_compat=yes
%
% Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
% Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
% > Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
% > only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
% > abort the macro if there aren't. You c
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Michael P. Soulier wrote:
% >
% > Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
% > Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat option listed. But, if I put
% > it in my .muttrc, Mutt doesn't complain. Should I file
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi again!
Hiya!
%
% I'm having a problem posting to another list. I get this from time to
% time on various addresses and in various situations.
Interesting that it's not on all mail that you send...
%
% All of my mail is grabbed by fetchmail a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 19:20
* David T-G said
>
> You really should pick a cool name for your machine, you know :-)
>
Well, I had named it explodingnet.com (my websites name also) but then I
had problems mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Still trying to c
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 11-01-02 at 19:20
% * David T-G said
%
% > You really should pick a cool name for your machine, you know :-)
%
% Well, I had named it explodingnet.com (my websites name also) but then I
No, that won't work, as you saw; there already is on
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To really do it right you should get a domain and have that at your house,
> but realistically you could probably use home.explodingnet.com (since
> you control the domain and it's your home computer) or nick.yourisp.com
> (though that won't show up in a DN
At 09:00 +0100 11 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
> %_patch?
> can't find file to patch at input line 4
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
The above line is patch itself telling you wh
Hello List,
It has been a long time since i posted questions here, because RTFM is a
magical thing. Well, this time it is something i can not solve on my
own...
I have been doing some changes to my ~/.muttrc, restructuring stuff and so
on. Tried to use IMAP but since i did not have time to figur
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:24:47PM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Yeah, but the problem is that when 'chitchat' spins off from another
> thread, it rarely (in my experience) ends up getting moved. Although if
> people think that it will actually get used, I would support it
We had the "chitchat
Thank you very much, Cristiano.
Thanks to this MAGIC setting, now the pager display right.
Frankly speaking, I've read 'charset-hook' section of the manual a
couple of times, which defines "alias". I can hardly imagine we can set
and use it this way. :-)
best regards,
charlie
On Fri, Jan 11, 2
At 17:04 -0600 10 Jan 2002, I wrote:
> http://schrab.com/aaron/mutt/patch-1.3.24.ats.date_optional.1
Unfortunately, that URL won't work for anybody but me. The correct one
is:
http://pug.schrab.com/aaron/mutt/patch-1.3.24.ats.date_optional.1
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
Hi folks,
I've been using Mutt for quite some time, and now I have a problem. My
current mutt (1.2.5i on FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE) seems to have some
problems:
I have set up mutt so that it accesses new mail that has been filtered into
my various inboxes and, once I have read these new messages, mo
Hi David,
David T-G wrote:
> How, however, is the proposed behavior (making $p_c_t generate a
> text/plain instead of an application/pgp message) different from what we
> have now with $p_c_t and $p_o_c? Note that I don't say that it fixes the
> problem you bring up, but it will fix the problem
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
I
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> > --== Jerri ==--
> > Homepage: http://www.jerri.de/ ICQ: 54160208
>
> It could be, ...
No, I'm certain that that is Jerri's homepage and ICQ number.
_PLEASE_ put your response directly after what you are replying to, it
makes everything so much easier to underst
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> This is quoted text: - End forwarded message -
>
> So what do you think?
> (I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!)
You die. You die and go to hell!
Just kidding ;)
> 9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Alas! Stephan Seitz spake thus:
> > Getting needed keys from a keyserver is completely a function of
> > your pgp/gpg program... the keyserver line is all that's needed if
> > you're using gpg. (Well, it works for verifying sigs anyway... I've
>
> Fine, but IIRC that only works if I wish to veri
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> % In my muttrc I have set the hostname="localhost" 'cos that's what it is.
So if I were to email root@localhost, which one of us do you think would
get the message? You should pick a better hostname ;)
> You really should pick a coo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Viktor,
I agree with everything you say (though I do hope the story about
rebinding the y-key was a joke). Your patch is important for the
wide-spread use of PGP in non-english communication.
I just checked that with your patch, I can finally use Mutt to sign
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
> > 9o)
>
> BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Christian,
> I agree with everything you say (though I do hope the story about
> rebinding the y-key was a joke). Your patch is important for the
> wide-spread use of PGP in non-english communication.
Why? It's the best I could come up with.
> I just checked that with your patch, I can fi
After talking to Michael Elkins for a little
this pretty much seems like a bug.
It appears that mutt is moving new messages from my new/ dir to the cur/
(I am running Maildir). So this is why N randomly appears in front of the
folder name. However, 5 minutes later Mutt (or not?) moves messages to
I have an Exchange server I use at work and I do a lot of access from home.
I have set up a Procmail recipe that will build an SSH tunnel between my
machine at work an my machine at home so that I can have direct access
from home (baby VPN setup). The question I have is:
Can I use something like
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:01:46PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
> Thank you, Chris. I'm glad to see/use your script with my mutt. Please
> post it.
Several people have contacted me about the script I use for sending
receipts. I decided just to post it here for anyone who wants it.
There's a couple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, a bit of history. I'm currently a Pine user and I'm considering
switching to Mutt since I have need of useable and useful PGP/GPG
handling.
I have one local machine and two remote IMAP machines, each of which have
mail folders on them. For
Ok, I've recompiled mutt with Vsevolod Volkoy's NNTP patch, and I've
been poking around a bit... but I can't for the life of my figure out
how to configure mutt for NNTP now that it is compiled properly. Anybody
know what I have to do?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has b
80 matches
Mail list logo
