On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:31:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson (dis)graced my inbox with:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 06:55:19PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:00:49PM -0800, Gary Johnson (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > > > Hmmm... push in the macro, you mean? That's certain
Cedric Duval muttered:
> Hi Roman,
>
> > I'd like to be able to use tag-thread, tag-subthred, tag-pattern in
> > the pager view. Looks like they're not defined in the pager map
> > (1.3.23i) are there any plans to include them in pager map, and if not,
> > would I (as someone who is not very good
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah i don't know how i'd survive without procmail. i've heard good
> things about spam assassin. i use spambouncer (www.spambouncer.org)
> which is great. it does catch some stuff that isn't spam, so you do
> have to check your spam folder once in a w
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm always looking for ways to cut down on spam, but I haven't come up
> with a good rc.spam file (I have a fairly simple $HOME/.procmailrc and
> a bunch of $HOME/.procmail/rc.* includes). Would you care to post [a
> link to] your .procmailrc and method?
W
On 2001-12-10 14:31:54 -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
>I think your best bet is to check them at delivery time via your
>MDA (maildrop, procmail, etc.) Have it add a header indicating its
>results, and have mutt perform checks based on the presence or
>contents of this header.
I'd also recommend
* Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm always looking for ways to cut down on spam, but I haven't
> > come up with a good rc.spam file (I have a fairly simple
> > $HOME/.procmailrc and a bunch of $HOME/.procmail/rc.* includes).
> > Would you car
[EMAIL PROTECTED] definitely sucks. Don't use it.
Thus spake Peter Jay Salzman, on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800:
> hi there,
>
> how can i bind an unused key to:
>
> 1. turn on all headers
> 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3. run a script i wrote that keeps track of how muc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:24:59PM +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] definitely sucks. Don't use it.
thank you for sharing this observation.
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg21495/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 Abu spewed into the ether:
> I want open file (tar.gz,tgz,bz2) on the fly with mutt,
> like open .pdf file, how can i do it with mutt?
Dave Pearson has a neat mutt.octet.filter here :
http://www.davep.org/mutt/
I find it quite cool :-)
pv.
--
Prahlad Vaidyanathan
when setting an option like "lists", are:
lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
and
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists [EMAIL
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:10:24 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: are options replaced or and'ed?
> From: Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> setting an option like "lists", are:
>
> lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTE
Peter Jay Salzman muttered:
> when setting an option like "lists", are:
>
> lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>
> and
>
> lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm getting a lot of mails novadays which have no
subject and no body at all. They all seem to come
from various mailing list I'm subscribed to, nut mostly
from debian-users and linux-kernel. Also all of them
seem to have a bounce address of that list in the From
headers. e.g bounce-debian-us
Thus spake Benjamin Michotte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
> and/or 3156.
Yes. Mutt is in the minority for doing this, but it's now the "right"
way, especially for non-US character sets.
> Some friends use mua as kmail which still
Hi there,
the post about anding / oring values of these variables (ok, so they're
listed as commands :) reminded me of one thing that was a somewhat
unpleasant surprise when I started using mutt... I never got around
asking about it, so here you are. :)
I was quite surprised to find out that the
Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages "in line" or must I
> > force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is difficult ;p)
>
> Yes. Try 'pgp_create_traditional', optionally with the Outlook
> compatibility patch. It will change the content-type so that Ou
Thus spake Viktor Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
> us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
> pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
> around (look at the archives).
Agreed. Sorr
The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
long threads, where some messages have been deleted, so I know which
messages are on equal levels and such. But, I wonder if this could be
done, which might have the same effect, but make the threads narrower.
Instead of somet
Benjamin Michotte wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> > I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
> > us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
> > pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
> >
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
> Does that mean, that I have to add a "default score" to all received
> messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score?
yes, I think so.
add:
score ~A 5000
as your first scoring rule and everything should be fine (or
Ken --
...and then Ken Weingold said...
%
% The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
...
% Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?-> or the
% like, replacing all the '?'s with a number representing them? Seems
% like a happy medium.
That sound
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 02:19:33AM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
> > Does that mean, that I have to add a "default score" to all received
> > messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score?
> yes, I think so.
> add:
>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:07:59AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
> I still feel very dumb on this.
> Can someone explain to an idiot what the scoring is for
> and how you use it.
> The manual assumes you know.
> I assume it is some kind of super-filtering technique.
I don't ac
Hi, Mutters!
Hm, I didn't get an answer from anyone so I dare ask again:
Is there a unix tool (or another method) to convert something like this
Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
into this
Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
The reason I need this is that I use procmail to d
Thus spake Andy Spiegl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there a unix tool (or another method) to convert something like this
> Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
> into this
> Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
The encoded format is called "quoted-printable", and there should be
uti
Hello,
when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
and/or 3156.
Some friends use mua as kmail which still use PGP "in line" as described
in RFC 1991 and receive my mails signed/crypted as attachments.
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages "in line" or must
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
> us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
> pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
> around (look at the archives).
Ok,
27 matches
Mail list logo
