Peter Jay Salzman muttered: > when setting an option like "lists", are: > > lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > and > > lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > equivalent?
They are. > or do susequent "lists" directives replace earlier ones? No s.o. > is this behavior reasonably consistant? i mean for example, that > nobody would expect two editors to be set simultaneously after > > set editor='/usr/bin/vim' > set editor='/usr/bin/ed' > > but things like "unignore" would behave this way. unignore, lists, mailboxes,... are commands that append there arguments to a list of values. $editor is a variable. Variables can be set to another value. You can append, or delete an element from a list; in mutt you can only append; though. Would you expect after color index green yellow ~N color index white black ~D That there's only one color pattern in the index? > also, is there a command (like vim's ":set") that lets me view all > mutt configuration options? AFAIK no. That would be a nice feature, though. Any takers? HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
