There are a couple of things that I would like to get mutt
to do, but I've been unable to figure out how to do them.
They are:
1) Have messages marked for deletion be moved to +trash
(which can be cleared out using a nightly cron job) instead
of actually being deleted.
2) Move a message to a new
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:58 +0800
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
from hgf3@localhost
- The following addresses had permanent f
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:33:00AM -0500, John Patton wrote:
>
> 2) Move a message to a new folder. Right now I use C to copy
> msg to the desired folder, and then D to delete it. Can this
> operation be combined? In this case, the message would not
> need to be moved to +trash.
>
Use 's' instea
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The original message was received at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
> >from hgf3@localhost
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (reason: 553 sorry, your sender is not liked (#5.7.1))
>
Subba Rao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I have a folder which has lots of email (about 2000+). I want to select all the
> email and move it to a different folder or possibly delete them. Is there any
> way to globally tag all the files from this folder? The fastest I could do was
> to "T" but thi
> > >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <<< 553 sorry, your sender is not liked (#5.7.1)
> > 501 5.6.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data format error
>
> If kde.org is blocking mail.com, what can we (or mutt) do?
That's understandable. One of our users, long gone, seems to have
set up a fwding accou
Hello,
After five years of intensive mutt use I finally started using scoring
(especially since applying that wonderful nntp patch ;).
I only have a small problem with the escaping rules and syntax of the
"score" commands in my .muttc:
folder-hook . unscore
## assign a positive
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> And most of their dialups/dsl boxes etc. are so open you could drive
> an aircraft carrier through ...
Lars - you got mail.com confused with someone else. They don't do dialup / dsl
- they are a freemail service (free webmail + forwarding, paid po
Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
> Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > And most of their dialups/dsl boxes etc. are so open you could drive
> > an aircraft carrier through ...
>
> Lars - you got mail.com confused with someone else. They don't do dialup / dsl
> - they are a freemai
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
> > Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> > > And most of their dialups/dsl boxes etc. are so open you could drive
> > > an aircraft carrier through ...
> > Lars - you got mail.com confused with someone e
* Horace G. Friend III [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [01-04-01] wrote:
> I tried the perl script but I'm getting an error when trying the execute
> the macro. The error message:
>
> sh: -c line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `'
> sh: -c line 1: `'
Horace,
In the macro line that you put in your
How do you request Mutt to show if the email has a GPG/PGP
authentication/identification key attached to it?
I would like to see it in the main menu and when I open the email.
Thank you in advance for any help.
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/subba9/
Hi Everyone,
I've got two ISP accounts, with one email account on each. I'm using
only one at the moment because I don't know how to configure my system
to enable me to use the other _easily_. But now I think I'm ready --
with help from you folks. :)
One uses pap authorization (what I'm currentl
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:25:22PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III typed:
> I've got two ISP accounts, with one email account on each. I'm using
> only one at the moment because I don't know how to configure my system
> to enable me to use the other _easily_. But now I think I'm ready --
> with help
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:52:07PM +0100, Brian Foley wrote:
> * Horace G. Friend III [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [01-04-01] wrote:
> > I tried the perl script but I'm getting an error when trying the execute
> > the macro. The error message:
> >
> > sh: -c line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:58:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The original message was received at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
> > >from hgf3@localhost
> >- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
>
I would like Mutt be alert me when I'm replying to a message where the
address in the To: header is different than my default address, but
still within my domain name. My default address is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but sometimes I like to send out mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I reply to messages that
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:05:22AM -0700, Justin Burke
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I would like Mutt be alert me when I'm replying to a message where the
> address in the To: header is different than my default address, but
> still within my domain name. My default address is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
I don't know what changed, but for the last day or two every time
I send a message from mutt, I get this message:
~/.mutt/tmp/mutt-merrill-5493-10 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
I have to confirm that on every message I send. Did something
change without my knowing it? What do I have
Hi,
I have sucessfully compiled mutt 1.2.5i on MacOSX 10.0.
But when I try to start mutt I get this error message:
Error opening Terminal: vt100. I tried setting $TERM to
vt220 etc. but no success either. I can remember having
a similar error message, when I installed lynx but this
is months ago
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:29:52PM +0200, Christoph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have sucessfully compiled mutt 1.2.5i on MacOSX 10.0.
> But when I try to start mutt I get this error message:
> Error opening Terminal: vt100. I tried setting $TERM to
> vt220 etc. but no success either. I can remember having
I'm defining mailboxes in ~/.muttrc as follows...
mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*` /var/spool/mail/graffix
...that works fine for displaying notifications about new messages in those folders.
the problem is is that $HOME/mail/* includes sent (set record=~/mail/sent), and i'd
rather not get notif
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:12:30PM -0600, dan radom wrote:
> I'm defining mailboxes in ~/.muttrc as follows...
>
> mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*` /var/spool/mail/graffix
>
> ...that works fine for displaying notifications about new messages in
> those folders. the problem is is that $HOME/mail/*
sorry to reply to my own message, but i think i may have figured it out.
ls -al $HOME/mail/* |awk '{print $9}' |grep -v sent
produces
/home/user/mail/inbox
/home/user/mail/mutt-users
and so on. is there any reason that i couldn't replace the echo command with the ls
-al one for my mailboxes d
Try piping it through sed... something like:
... | sed 's/sent //'
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:12:30PM -0600, dan radom wrote:
> I'm defining mailboxes in ~/.muttrc as follows...
>
> mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*` /var/spool/mail/graffix
>
> ...that works fine for displaying notifications ab
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 12:27:43PM +1000, Tony Collins wrote:
> Thanks, that helps a lot. However, is there a way to make mutt
> automatically sign all messages without having to tell it every time?
>
This is from the muttrc manpage:
pgp_autosign
Type: boolean
Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is it only Jeremy who maintains the mutt site? The URL to a patch I have
> linked from there is dead, and I send him the updated one but haven't
> heard from him.
Sorry. I generally save all those messages and clear out the queue when a
new stable versi
I would like Mutt be alert me when I'm replying to a message where the
address in the To: header is different than my default address, but
still within my domain name. My default address is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but sometimes I like to send out mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I reply to messages that
Hi, Jan-Hendrik Palic!
Sometime (on Saturday, March 31 at 3:44) I've received something...
>But I'm not able to post messages, I tried it serveral time, an I got only
>an message as this:
><<<<<<<
>This message was created automatically by mail delivery softw
* On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:58:03PM -0700, Dave Murray wrote:
Now my fucking english ..
> What are the ramifications on mutt & sendmail if I edit
> /etc/hosts?
This file is for make shure thats your maschine all
inside-maschines in the localnet knows.
> It currently is:
> 127.0.0.1 localho
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:52:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> You were not able to find this one out yourself? Time to start a little
> reading, isn't it? ;)
I thought I'd looked in quite a few places before I asked. What a shame
that one of them wasn't http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:47:25AM +, Subba Rao wrote:
> How do you request Mutt to show if the email has a GPG/PGP
> authentication/identification key attached to it?
It shows an S for signed mails and a K for an attached key.
P for encrypted.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Often I send an url like
http:/somewhere.com/whatever
The line of the URL is the only line in the body - mutt takes the line
and makes a header out of it. /not/ what I want.
How do I get round this?
--
Eric Smith
Fruitcom.com Benelux
Wireless +31 617 232 304
Better to use ls -1. You bypass a lot of fstat() calls when doing the
ls -l, you probably don't need the -a (unless you have boxes that start
with a "."), and by doing ls -1 you bypass the need for the awk command.
ls -1 $HOME/mail/* | grep -v sent
Much better, and more efficient on a large mai
* Justin Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is there a way for Mutt to recognize this situation and then either
> alert me about it or take some default action (ie. use the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] address by default)?
Yes. I'm in this same situation. The relevant lines from my .muttrc look
like this:
Could someone post a procmail recipe for vim? I've been dabbling with
the following, but they don't seem to work..
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
:0:
* ^From:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim-help
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
:0:
* ^Sender:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
duh...
thanks
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Now I get it. And I thought this was a mutt or mail system config
> problem. This thing also happened to me at the redhat-install-list.
> Believe it or not, even mail.com rejects mails that I send from my pc
> addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Smith wrote:
> Often I send an url like
> http:/somewhere.com/whatever
>
> The line of the URL is the only line in the body - mutt takes the line
> and makes a header out of it. /not/ what I want.
> How do I get round this?
If you have $edit_headers unset in your ~/.muttrc file, then the
d
John Patton muttered:
> 1) Have messages marked for deletion be moved to +trash
## Let's implement some trash folder
# Don't ask whether to really copy / move messages
set confirmappend=no
# save messages marked for deletion in trash folder and sync mailbox
macro index ~D=trash\
"move tagged
dan radom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*` /var/spool/mail/graffix
> (set record=~/mail/sent)
set record=~/mail/.sent
hides the problem child ...
--
The cause of the problem is:
Zombie processes haunting the computer
http://cgi.cs.wisc.edu/scripts/ballard/bof
Marius Strom wrote:
> Better to use ls -1. You bypass a lot of fstat() calls when doing the
> ls -l, you probably don't need the -a (unless you have boxes that start
> with a "."), and by doing ls -1 you bypass the need for the awk command.
>
> ls -1 $HOME/mail/* | grep -v sent
>
> Much better,
I use this for the vim help/user list, which seems to work:
:0:
* 1^0 ^from.*vim@vim\.org
* 1^0 ^to.*vim@vim\.org
* 1^0 ^cc.*vim@vim\.org
vim
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:51:53PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> Could someone post a procmail recipe for vim? I've been dabbling with
> the following, but
Hi everyone,
I'm pretty new to mutt, but I love it so far.
My one problem: I'd like to eliminate, or reduce headers at least in my mailboxes.
Actually, I'ld like to if possible just keep the basic headers like Subject and From,
rather than get the entire envelope. Is this possible?
TIA,
Thom
Thomas Duterme wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm pretty new to mutt, but I love it so far.
>
> My one problem: I'd like to eliminate, or reduce headers at least in my mailboxes.
>Actually, I'ld like to if possible just keep the basic headers like Subject and From,
>rather than get the entire envel
Thomas Duterme proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> My one problem: I'd like to eliminate, or reduce headers at least in my
> mailboxes. Actually, I'ld like to if possible just keep the basic headers
> like Subject and From, rather than get the entire envelope. Is this
> possible?
ignore *
unignor
45 matches
Mail list logo
