Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Corey G. proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Procmail simply needs to use many of the filters that were presented on
> > this list, but the most powerful weapon is with sendmail. I use code
> > that I found from sendmail.org which rejects domains found in a tex
raf proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> or FEATURE(`rbl') to make use of realtime blackhole list at rbl.maps.vix.com.
> then you don't have to do anything else :)
Use both. They go hand in hand.
-s (just because you think a guy is a bozo, you can't have his domain
RBL'd - see htt
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
: I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
: raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
^
gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use
gpg_2comp is commented out
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:08:14AM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2co
* Bruce DeVisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001023 23:20]:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Is there a way (1.3.10i if it matters) to set the mailbox list order?
> > I.E. I want it to be reverse date sent always (I do O d when I get
> > into it).
> >
> > I can't see
Hello list!
I can't get the "new" resend-message feature to work as I expect it to
do. If I try using a previously sent e-mail as a template for a new one,
hitting -e, I get the old e-mail in my editor. Works fine. But,
after I edit this "template", and then send it, there is no trace in
my out-m
Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands
raf wrote:
> Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>
> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> >^
> > gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at
On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
> I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
> However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
Hi - try these
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:31:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> raf wrote:
>
> > Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> >
> > > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> > >
On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
That's a summary of existing usage
> RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery)
Don't know that one. Does it define a priority mechanism?
--
Thomas Roessler
> Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> receiver notices this.
> I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> standard mail client feature? Or this not depreciated
On 2000-10-24 11:10:28 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> queue. The algorithm behind that is described in
> > Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> > header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> > to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> > queue. The algorithm behind that is described in the Sendmail
> > Installation and Operat
Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> > receiver notices this.
> > I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> > It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> > standard mail client
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
> That's a summary of existing usage
Yes - and it documents the common usages of the Priority: header.
> > RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient
Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> So: what I would have expected to happen is that the newly sent
> message be saved to my out-mailbox, since it is in effect a new
> message sent from me.
>
> What am I missing?
You're missing that there's no default Fcc value prov
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> ... and not supported by MTAs different from sendmail, such as
> postfix or qmail, right?
Right for qmail too.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer
I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are
saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox
one.
Is it possible? If yes, how?
Thanks for replying
.oesse.
--
--
Marco Giardini
Big Brother tells me that Marco Giardini wrote:
> I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are
> saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox
> one.
> Is it possible? If yes, how?
> Thanks for replying
fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +special-folder
--
"Rest
Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that
allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager?
I have a set of cron jobs that run hourly that send me updates from
various systems & processes, and I'd like to be able to just open mutt
& recall this default search patte
On 2000.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dan Boger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yikes! why would you want to ever overwrite a whole folder with one message?
> I'd be scared of hitting o by mistake...
Mutt treats all save files as folders. Sometimes you just want the one
message, but
Hi all! A co-worker stated the other day that the biggest feature that has
kept him from switching from Pine to mutt is the fact that pine supports
roles.
>From what I could gather, a role in pine basically allows you to set your
From: email address depending on who the message you're replying t
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
> send-hook \
> '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
set alternates, and set reverse_name
> I'm assuming that this is a feature that
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
>
> > send-hook \
> > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> > 'my_hdr From: [EM
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 00:01:18 +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
>
> This doesn't work:
>
> macro compose "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
Try this:
macro compose "/home/mark/templates/mime"
> Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro j
Using a large mallet, Adrian Chung whacked out:
> when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name.
likely you have to set the envelope sender too - post the relevant parts of
your muttrc plz
>Why don't you like qmail?
it's an allergy of some kind :P I prefer exim (or i
* On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> it could even be called a bug.
Hey, a mutt bug, I didn't think those existed! Anyway, I've been
trying to so
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:48:31PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg muttered:
> * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> > resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> > it could even be called a bug.
>
Paul Makepeace muttered:
> 1) How I do instruct mutt to recognize me as a
> variety of alternate email addresses
see $alternates
> 2) Turn off a limited view.
(l)imit to ~A or .
HTH,
Michael
--
APL hackers do it in the quad.
PGP-Key: http://www.stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de
Hello
I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions:
- when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand
invalid"
- when I send mails the following error occurs: "/home/info/Mail/sent: No
such file or directory (errno=2)" . I know there are some variabl
Hi! I figured out how to set things up so that now I can properly reply to
different people based on the original inbound email address.
But I ran into a strange occurrence, which I'm not sure is my fault.
I've set up mutt so that:
set reverse_name
set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
a
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
>
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set si
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 20:48:31 +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> > resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> > it could even be called a bug.
>
> He
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
> >
> > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hd
Mark Weinem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 23 Oct 2000:
> Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
Sure.
> This doesn't work:
>
> macro compose "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
>
> Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro just offers the
> templates directory and the use
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
>I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set
> reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail
> addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain),
> when I hit reply, I
* On Tuesday, October 24, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> > Not: macro generic \eu "f=sentmail"
>
> This should in theory work if you have remembered to remove the
> default key bindings for u in the various menus which
> otherwise will take precedence over the generic definition.
No, I don't have any
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > exactly. when you set the sig, or a header, it's not only for that message.
> > so you need to do something like:
> >
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
> > send-hook . 'unset signature'
>
>Cool, so it's not just me...
>
>
Jeff Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that
> allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager?
Not beyond doing a macro which first invokes a pager and then does a
"PATTERN" (where PATTERN is your pattern).
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
>
>Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :)
It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc
command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably complex to try to limit
the scope to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote:
> See "grepm" and "grepmail"
But are there no tools for Maildirs?
Ciao,
Mark
PGP signature
Hello All,
My users convinced me to go to IMAP for the mail system verses using
sendmail/local mailboxes/POP. They swore up and down that the old
command line junkies like me would not be effected. So I let them
implement cyrus IMAP. I can get to my inbox ( {localhost:143}INBOX )
but I ca
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:25:22PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> it could even be called a bug.
>
> So: There is no Fcc unless you remember to manually add o
Hi!
I'm getting a lot af mail with *.doc files attached, and I'd like to
use catdoc to show them in mutt, how do I do that?
I have the line:
application/msword; catdoc -s iso8859-1 %s|less; cupiousoutput
in my ~/.mutt_mailcap, and an autoview antry for it in my ~/.muttrc, and
I still
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> Depends on what you're using the resend feature for. If you're resending a
> message that you already sent it should already be in your Fcc and what's the
> point of adding it again?
True, but in that case you can delete the Fcc from the
Hi!
Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
to find out?
TIA
Glyn M
--
* None can love freedom he
Mark Weinem proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote:
> > See "grepm" and "grepmail"
> But are there no tools for Maildirs?
I believe grepmail does maildirs rather well.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.or
Martin Schweizer proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions:
> - when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand
> invalid"
Try recompiling it.
> - when I send mails the following error occurs: "/home/info/Mail/
Glyn Millington proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
Mutt generally saves copies of sent mails - anyway, rtfm about fcc hooks.
--
On 25 Oct 00, 12:01AM, Morten Liebach wrote:
> application/msword; catdoc -s iso8859-1 %s|less; cupiousoutput
try spelling it "copiousoutput";)
peter
PGP signature
try this in your .muttrc :
my_hdr Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peter
On 25 Oct 00, 2:37AM, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
--
Peter Jaqu
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:37:19AM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
In your .muttrc:
set copy
- Myrddin
---
54 matches
Mail list logo
