raf wrote:
> Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>
> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use
> > gpg_2comp is commented out and replaced by "clear" gpg commands.
> >
> > Check for is you use fresh gpg.rc?
> >
> > --
> > Andrew W. Nosenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> the version of gpg.rc that comes with gnupg-1.0.4
^^^^^^^^^^^
(doh) mutt-1.2.5
> (dated 2000/05/23) doesn't have the gpg_2comp commands
> commented out. they're not there at all. BUT there's
> still a comment at the top stating that gpg_2comp is used :)
>
> raf
>
