On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:31:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> raf wrote:
>
> > Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> >
> > > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use
> > > gpg_2comp is commented out and replaced by "clear" gpg commands.
> > >
> > > Check for is you use fresh gpg.rc?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew W. Nosenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
> > the version of gpg.rc that comes with gnupg-1.0.4
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> (doh) mutt-1.2.5
> > (dated 2000/05/23) doesn't have the gpg_2comp commands
> > commented out. they're not there at all. BUT there's
> > still a comment at the top stating that gpg_2comp is used :)
> >
> > raf
> >
It was the comment at the top that lead me to get it and think it was
being used. My version from 1.2.5 has reference to gpg_2comp as foes my
version of 1.3.10
Brian.
--
Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chemistry, School of BECS, SITE, NT University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847. http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/
Get PGP2 Key:- http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/chemistry/duke.key.html
