Mutt can remember the pgp passphrase once it is entered by the user.
How does mutt passes the phrase over to pgp when en-/decrypting a message?
Is there an algorithm that checks for the pgp passphrase input message
and sends it as stdin ?
Daniel.
Yes, yes. There's a log which contains the full error message. Perhaps
someone can give you the exact file
--
David
www.richSOB.com
- Original Message -
From: "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mutt Users' List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rod Pike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg.pgp
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to work under the Mac OS X
> Public Beta.
1.2.4i didn't compile because it couldn't find things like A_NORMAL. I
did find a curses library in some odd place, I might try again with slang or
som
Hi. I have mutt 1.0.1-9 and GnuPG 1.0.1-2 installed in my Debian 2.2 box.
I've looked at all the FAQs and I can't seem to figure out how to do
"pgp_autosign" for all outgoing emails. All I get is:
gnupg: [options]
at the bottom of the screen after giving my passphrase and it won't be sent
unl
You may wish to try ncurses instead of the system-supplied curses
library.
May be a good idea anyways.
On 2000-10-17 11:30:45 +0100, John Wright wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:30:45 +0100
> From: John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Users ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Mutt on M
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:06:23AM +0200 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Daniel Kollar thought:
> Mutt can remember the pgp passphrase once it is entered by the user.
> How does mutt passes the phrase over to pgp when en-/decrypting a message?
> Is there an algorithm that checks for the pgp pass
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:09:05PM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Michael Elkins thought:
>
> I'll just add my $0.02US to this and agree with Bruce's example. After
> spending lots of time trying to weed out spammers, I found the most
> effective filter was to simple accept all known ad
On 2000.10.17 06:08:33, you,
the extraordinary Cliff Sarginson, opined:
> Often after reading a mail I need to forward it to a certain email
> address. This address is always the same one and I never need to change
> the subject or add comments in the text etc. Unfortunately until I read
> it I
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command.
You mean, like space does?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// T
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through
> the list of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for
> instance, my Work-related mailboxes are listed before the
> lists in .muttrc but there's times when I'm expecting a
On 2000-10-17 10:18:31 +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list
> of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my
> Work-related mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but
> there's times when I'm expecting a response to
Hi,
On 17.10, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Besides this, at the MTA level, see if you can get your sysadmin to
> support the RBL and DUL blacklists at least (also the RSS if possible) -
> http://www.mail-abuse.org
There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
and it
> > Mutt can remember the pgp passphrase once it is entered by the user.
> > How does mutt passes the phrase over to pgp when en-/decrypting a message?
> > Is there an algorithm that checks for the pgp passphrase input message
> > and sends it as stdin ?
> and can I snoop it over a network? :-)
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> > Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to work under the Mac OS X
> > Public Beta.
>
> 1.2.4i didn't compile because it couldn't find things like A_NORMAL. I
> did find a curses library i
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 03:43:46PM -0700, Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm afraid I'll
> end up filtering out my important mails. You know, things like distant
> relatives writing to give me money and such..
> thanks
I metho
Martin Treusch von Buttlar proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
> and it can use any DNS-RBL you like. I works great for me and you don't
> even need to pester your BOFH to enable this.
Like I said, spambouncer and walt dnes'
Ron & Others,
On 00-08-24 17:49, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I recall, doing something like adding copiousoutput to the
> particular mailcap entry may work (by getting mutt to wait for you to
> press a key)... or maybe it was needsterminal...
'copiousoutput'!
Straight from my m
I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't
find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I
configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl
together, only one of them as well as without either
of them. In all cases, when I read my mail with
the resulting executable and try to save a message,
I
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my Work-related
> mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but there's times when
> I'm expecting a
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Only hassle is that procmailing to block spam is like shutting the stable
> _after_ the horse has bolted. You've already received the mail ... so any
> saving in cost is illusory at best (esp with a desktop linux box conne
Daniel Kollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> The passphrase is sent via the command
> cat %?p?-?
>
> I'm not a unix expert. Can anyone explain these quotation marks (?),
> please?
> Can this %?p? be used in the mailcap file?
> I need to send the passphrase to mutt_octet-filt
Rino --
...and then Rino Mardo said...
% Hi. I have mutt 1.0.1-9 and GnuPG 1.0.1-2 installed in my Debian 2.2 box.
%
% I've looked at all the FAQs and I can't seem to figure out how to do
% "pgp_autosign" for all outgoing emails. All I get is:
All you need to do is set pgp_autosign and mutt w
Bharadwaj --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't
It very well might be :-)
% find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I
% configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl
% together, only one of them as well as without either
Sure; those c
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 22:24:36 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Ok, thats one point. But the problem is that when there are noch older
> mails the first mail will be moved to ~/Mail/archiv, even if thats a new
> mail. And this is my main problem.
It is a well known problem. The 'tag-prefix' c
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I don't know, I think the annoyance factor reduction is quite
> significant, and that shouldn't be discounted. True, there are no real
> material cost savings achievable at this point.
As a sysadmin for a largish isp + portal, my interests cent
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 07:07:05PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Only hassle is that procmailing to block spam is like shutting the stable
> _after_ the horse has bolted. You've already received the mail ... so any
> saving in cost is illusory at best (esp with a desktop linux box
>
hi all,
if i put "pgp-hook pattern id" in my config, mutt is asking
me to use id X for pattern Y. this is very useful. but why
is he giving me a list of the keys after that ? i already set this hook
so he should use this specified key. this is very annoying :)
can anyone help me ? maybe there are
David,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Although this was happenning on mailboxes that
live in my user area and that have the right
permissions, setting execute premissions of
mutt_dotlock (they were not set initially)
did the trick.
Thanks again,
Bharadwaj
(Mutt can bounce AND thread!!
Time h
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably
> means *not* you - can write in there. To get around that but not tie so
> much power into mutt itself, there is a little binary called mutt_dotlock
> which should be installed with
Dave Pearson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> to be bothered with it. I'd call it a "cost saving" in that it becomes a
> hell of a lot less annoying (and, if you're into reporting such email abuse
> there is the added benefit of having the email so you can go to work on it).
Point taken - and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> (Mutt can bounce AND thread!!
> Time has come to abandon ELM !!)
sig fodder, several years ago ;)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
Pardon this fortune. Dat
I just released a new version of the little brother's database with
the following changes:
* Add new module m_addr_email to request data from addressbook program
(http://red.roses.de/~clemens/addressbook/) by Torsten Jerzembeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* Some optimizations on m_addr_email
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:16:10PM +0300 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Mikko Hänninen thought:
> Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> > Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> > folders with new mail on the "c" command.
>
> You mean, like
Mikko Hänninen muttered:
> Daniel Kollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> > The passphrase is sent via the command
> > cat %?p?-?
> > Can this %?p? be used in the mailcap file?
>
> I'm not sure, but the %?p?-? looks like a Mutt expansion string.
>From my gpg.rc assuming that
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% > and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably
%
% Oh - and make sure /var/spool/mail has 1777 permissions.
Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't thin
Bharadwaj --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% David,
%
% Thanks for the quick reply.
You're quite welcome.
%
% Although this was happenning on mailboxes that
% live in my user area and that have the right
Really? You mean you had a mailbox in a directory like $HOME/Mail and
the per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it possible to use environment variable values in the .muttrc
file somehow? What I'd like to be able to do is put my KeyID for
my PGP key into an environment variable, and then have my .muttrc
reference this, telling mutt "to find his key id,
Jack McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Is it possible to use environment variable values in the .muttrc
> file somehow? What I'd like to be able to do is put my KeyID for
> my PGP key into an environment variable, and then have my .muttrc
> reference this, telling mutt
Hi to all...
sorry, this question is asked many time I thing
I had read the documentation for mutt and pgp more or less and I installed
pgp-2.6.3-i on my debian- mashine.
I generated a new key and I I wanted to send me a test mail with a sign.
In the send- menu of mutt, I hit p to use the p
Hello,
I'm trying to get PGP 6.5.2 working with mutt. I downloaded the pgp6.rc
file and am sourcing it in my .muttrc. Everything seems to work up to the
point where I choose the keyID for the user, then it bombs. Here is the
message it outputs:
-- Mutt: PGP keys matching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Martin Treusch von Buttlar proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
> > and it can use any DNS-RBL you like. I works great for me and you don't
> > even need to pester your BOFH to enable this.
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 05:59:11AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % > mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | grep -v sent | xargs`
>
> [BTW, Patric, you shouldn't even need the xargs on there.]
I seem to need it. And understandably - find prints out each match on
a seperate line.
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 05:59:11AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > % > mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | grep -v sent | xargs`
> >
> > [BTW, Patric, you shouldn't even need the xargs on there.]
>
> I seem to need it. And understandably - find prints out each match on
>
Hi, folks --
We've changed around to a homespool setup so I didn't notice until now,
but mutt_dotlock didn't get built when I whipped up 1.2.5 with our usual
patch cocktail. Running 'make' doesn't get me anything new; running
'make mutt_dotlock' gets me
[zero] [12:29am] ~/xfer/mutt/mutt-1.2.5
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't think we need
> stickiness, but to ensure that only root and mail can write in there...
Not the mailboxes - the directory /var/spool/mail/ ...
From the pine 4.21 docs ...
In installations like
raf proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> not if you run procmail on the other side of the modem
> before popping the mail to the local host.
That saves you part of the cost - but your ISP still has to bear the cost of
receiving the spam - and several ISPs figure out the costs involved in getting
Sorry folks I'm reposting since my recipe dunk all my emails to /dev/null. doh.
My question is how to make GNUPG (1.0.1-2) and mutt (1.0.1-9) sign all my
emails automagically.
At present if I manually make it sign an email it would ask for the passphrase,
and then would puke and give me:
gpg: [
48 matches
Mail list logo
