On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> Against 1.1.9, a couple of bugs is fixed. I really hope
> we can release this code as-is as 1.2 - so please report
> eventual bugs and problems as soon as possible to this
> list.
>
I have just built 1.1.10 and installed on th
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Against 1.1.9, a couple of bugs is fixed. I really hope
> we can release this code as-is as 1.2 - so please report
> eventual bugs and problems as soon as possible to this
> list.
>
OK, here's a report on my build on a Solaris 2.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:54:02AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> Finally I get the same error as on the Linux install regarding the
> mutt_dotlock file:-
>
> if test -f /usr/chris/bin/mutt_dotlock && test x != x ; then \
> chgrp /usr/chris/bin/mutt_dotlock && \
> chmod 7
On 2000-03-30 09:14:09 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> There a couple of compiler warnings:-
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic -g
>-O2 -c imap.c
> imap.c: In function `imap_check_mailbox':
> imap.c:1157: warning: `t' might be used uninitialized
At 11:05 +0200 30 Mar 2000, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2000-03-30 09:14:09 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > There a couple of compiler warnings:-
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic -g
>-O2 -c imap.c
> > imap.c: In function
* Christopher Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 02:09]:
> -you still need some authentication mechanism between gnupgd and
> applications, and this must somehow be fairly secure. I believe ssh2
> relies on process parent/child relationships to do
> authorization/authentication and I don't see this
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > There a couple of compiler warnings:-
> > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic
>-g -O2 -c imap.c
> > > imap.c: In function `imap_check_mailbox':
> > > imap.c:1157: warning: `t' might be used uninitialize
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid program called
muttpgphelper, say, and gives the passphrase to this program. When
mutt wants to invoke gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to
muttpgphelper which then invokes gnupg and gives the passphrase to
gnupg down another pipe.
pgp_ti
* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 13:06]:
> I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid program called
> muttpgphelper, say, and gives the passphrase to this program. When
> mutt wants to invoke gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to
> muttpgphelper which then invokes
On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
> program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
> passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to invoke
> gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to muttpgphelper
> which then invok
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:21:40AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > umh... I wouldn't really consider this a problem in the
> > installation mechanism...
>
> Since in cases like this, the resulting install could easily be unsafe,
> it could be argued that installing at all is an error. There shou
* Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 13:27]:
> > I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
> > program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
> > passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to invoke
> > gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to muttpgphelper
> > which then
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:52:02 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
[snip]
> - time_t t;
> + time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
>
> - /*
> - * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
> - * of t. This is wrong.
> - */
> -
I disagree. You shouldn't prevent warnin
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:48:53PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:52:02 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> [snip]
> > - time_t t;
> > + time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
> >
> > - /*
> > - * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
> > -
Hmm, what about the --with-charmaps option?
I downloaded ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/charmaps-0.0.tar.gz and untarred it
in the sourcedire of mutt-1.1.10 -- but this file is really old. Has it been
overridden yet?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Windows has
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> ? That's what he did !
> He added: time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
> And removed: The comment in /* */
It is not the size of the source file discussed here, but the size of
the resulting binary. This tends to be big
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - time_t t;
> > + time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
> >
> > - /*
> > - * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
> > - * of t. This is wrong.
> > - */
> > -
>
> I disagree. You shouldn't prevent warnings like this. If
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 03:21:19PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> It is not the size of the source file discussed here, but the size of
> the resulting binary. This tends to be bigger and slower because of the
> additional assignment.
=:|
I really prefer code that compiles without warning. Someti
I didn't expect to start a religious war, but being Jewish, I can
appreciate this
I just wanted to know why. It was cached temporarily was enough for me,
but the responses were intriguing.
:>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
> On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100,
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:21:40AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
% >
% > Since in cases like this, the resulting install could easily be unsafe,
% > it could be argued that installing at all is an error. There should
Actually, it seems to me that the ins
Chris --
I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's princip
Hi!
On Don, Mär 30, 2000 at 09:19:42 -0500, David T-G wrote
> Now, the good news is that any mutt_dotlock with the proper perms will
> do. If you can get your sysadmin to install mutt_dotlock somewhere (like
I would like an install-option that installs mutt without
mutt_dotlock.
I can install
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:25:45PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You're right. My patch made the code bigger. By exactly one xor
> instruction on i386! But here's an alternative patch that makes the
> code smaller (but it is less obvious that this patc
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:32:16PM +0200, Jean-Charles Bagneris wrote:
> Of course, each time I press 's', I have to give the name of the folder I want to
>save to.
> So my question is : is there a way to give (in a folder-hook may be) a default name
>for the
> archive folder ?
Put somethi
David T-G writes:
> Chris --
>
> I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
> Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
> old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
Old by date, but still, it's the previous release :)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Chris --
>
> I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
> Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
> old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
>
The compil
Maybe a contest about generating the shortest
self-replicating program which runs on a given
architecture is more productive like this. ;-)
I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe a contest about generating the shortest
> self-replicating program which runs on a given
> architecture is more productive like this. ;-)
>
> I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
Does it work anything like the attached program?
Edmund
#include
Hello,
I recieved a strange email from some company. The mail headers do not list me
as recipient so I do not know why I did recieve the mail at all. Also the top 'FROM '
header line (and the derieved return path) is a bit strange and I do not really know
what to make of it. I attached
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
> On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
>
> > I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
> > program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
> > passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to in
Hmmm, oddly, I rec'd the exact same message today !! It appears someone
may have skimmed the mutt list for e-mail addresses.
But, why your name didn't show in the header was that you (and I and
probably others on this list) were "Blind Carbon Copy"'d. This is how
spammers do it. With a "BCC", wha
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
THNX,
Steffan
On 2000-03-30 15:14:38 +0100, Chris Tilbury wrote:
> SSH does something like this - there's a "ssh-agent"
> program which you add keys to from your keyring by
> running a program.
Guess where the wording "passphrase-agent" came from. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:47:15PM +0200, S.P. Hoeke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
> The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
>
> THNX,
> Steffan
>
Maybe you'd have more luck asking your question on the qmail
I should have been paying attention when i enterd the (incorrect) alias instead of
trying to watch TV with one eye
Please don't shoot me :-0
Greetz,
Steffan
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:27:32PM -0500, Walt Mankowski muttered:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:47:15PM +0200, S.P. Hoeke wrote:
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30 Mar 2000 :
> save-hook in your .muttrc
I must be stupid...
I did read that when I first browsed the manual a few weeks ago.
But yesterday, I searched through config variables, not config commands.
Sorry for this, and thanks
--
JcB, Jean-Charles Bagneris, Montpell
I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
your character set for a "quoting reply"
of instance
blah blah said:
& lakdjfslakdjf
& kjad;slfjaklsdjf
& kajds;lfkjasldkfj
^---> this being the "quoting reply character"
---
/helfman
"At any given moment, you
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:54:55PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
:I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
:your character set for a "quoting reply"
set indent_string="& "
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Hmmm, oddly, I rec'd the exact same message today !! It appears someone
> may have skimmed the mutt list for e-mail addresses.
I received this mail too. I think this is only a confirmation for a
delivered mail sent to this list (b
> :I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
> :your character set for a "quoting reply"
The manual says:
... You are strongly encouraged not to
change this value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatical netizens.
...
:-)
> set indent_string="& "
Why not
Hi,
* Robert Suetterlin wrote on 30 Mär 2000:
> I recieved a strange email from some company.
Sam Alleman is having his email forwarded via a satellite
data connection, as he is currently on a boat somewhere on the ocean
;-). I have written some mails to him and for every
mail I got such
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:45:23PM +0900, Sam Alleman wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what this message is all about:
>
> ~~/tmp/mutt-xena-22566-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
>
> What does this mean, and is there any way to bypass this question?
My guess is that mutt is telling you t
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:25:45PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > - time_t t;
> > > + time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
> > > - * of t. This is wr
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > set indent_string="& "
>
> Why not set it to "From: " for maximum confusion and MUA breaking :-)
That is a cool idea, but don't you mean "From "?
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:49:15PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-03-30 17:11:26 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> >> I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
> > Does it work anything like the attached program?
>
> No. Just try
>
> #!/bin/cat
Hm. I had almost the same idea :)
Lars --
...and then Lars Hecking said...
% David T-G writes:
% > Chris --
% >
% > I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
% > Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
% > old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
% > old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
% >
% The compiler is already gcc. It's just the
Jean-Charles Bagneris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Of course, each time I press 's', I have to give the name of the
> folder I want to save to. So my question is : is there a way to give
> (in a folder-hook may be) a default name for the archive folder ?
You can also simply tag all the messag
sorry guys that's my fault hit r(eply) instead of R(eply to list).
As Sebastian Helms<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> So if you sent a message to the list, ...
>
--
Darrin Mison
--
There's nothing like a girl with a plunging neckline to keep a man on his toes.
PGP signature
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First save the email to a separate file.
> Then just call sendmail on the file:
> sendmail -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /path/to/folder/file
What you describe is exactly what the (b)ounce command does in Mutt.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
> news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
> to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
> interactively, all i can do is to use command
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
> > news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
> > to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
> > interactively, all i can do is
Mikko_Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it can't be done with Mutt *alone*. It can be done _to_ emails
> sent with Mutt, though. There's been at least 2 or 3 different
> solutions mentioned to you, which all involve the use of external
> helper scripts.
Yes. I read the digest so it
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 30 Mar 2000:
> Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > First save the email to a separate file.
> > Then just call sendmail on the file:
> > sendmail -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /path/to/folder/file
>
> What you describe is exactly what the (b
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:39:42PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Lars --
>
> ...and then Lars Hecking said...
> % David T-G writes:
> % > Chris --
> % >
> % > I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
> % > Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned tha
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:40:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Chris --
>
> ...and then Chris Green said...
> % On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % >
> % > Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
> % > old; can you get/build a new one a
56 matches
Mail list logo
