Applying deletions without exiting

2000-01-06 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Hi, Is there a way to delete the files tagged as delete without leaving mutt? Thank you Alwyn Schoeman

Re: Applying deletions without exiting

2000-01-06 Thread Mike Bell
> Is there a way to delete the files tagged as delete without leaving > mutt? Yup, "$".

Re: Applying deletions without exiting

2000-01-06 Thread Jorge Godoy
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 10:57:06AM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to delete the files tagged as delete without leaving > mutt? Use the sync command. Usually it's just pressing the $ sign. > Thank you > Alwyn Schoeman Regards, -- Godoy. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Applying deletions without exiting

2000-01-06 Thread staeci
control-x on mine too. > Use the sync command. Usually it's just pressing the $ sign. -- Darrin Mison -- Laugh, and the world ignores you. Crying doesn't help either. PGP signature

[REPOST] y2k fix for mutt

2000-01-06 Thread Thomas Roessler
[Given that there have been several people asking for this recently, I'm reposting this message. I guess I should start to release 1.0.1...] Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies two-digit year nu

Re: [REPOST] y2k fix for mutt

2000-01-06 Thread Lars Hecking
Thomas Roessler writes: > [Given that there have been several people asking for this recently, > I'm reposting this message. I guess I should start to release > 1.0.1...] > > Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works > just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 or

Re: patch-1.1.1.me.pgpsearchtext.1

2000-01-06 Thread Dirk Pirschel
Hi, On Wed, 05 Jan 2000, Michael Elkins wrote: > NOTE: this should only be used as > a last resort if you absolutely can't use procmail to rewrite your messages > as suggested in doc/PGP-notes.txt. The procmail rule only works if the mail is text/plain. I sometimes get mails like multipart/*

bind behaves wrong for key

2000-01-06 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi, I am trying to bind a key in the alias menu to select the current entry and exit out the alias menu and go back to the To: prompt. I have tried the following and it works fine: bind alias s select-entry But when I try:

autimatically deleting msgs with a given subject

2000-01-06 Thread Sebastian Helms
Hi out there, I am thinking about the following: when receiving certain messages like notifications about successful program termination, I would like to have them deleted automatically after reading. That is, like moving read mail to /dev/null. As far as I could find out, mbox-hooks only work

Re: bind behaves wrong for key

2000-01-06 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 07 Jan 2000: > But when I try: > > bind alias select-entry I'm using this: bind alias \n " q" "select (tag) current entry and exit" which shows up as being bound to , not . Hmm. But it works. :-) I probably should change that

Re: autimatically deleting msgs with a given subject

2000-01-06 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Sebastian Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 06 Jan 2000: > when receiving certain messages like notifications about successful > program termination, I would like to have them deleted automatically > after reading. That is, like moving read mail to /dev/null. I'm using this: folder-hook

Re: bind behaves wrong for key

2000-01-06 Thread Mikko Hänninen
I wrote on Thu, 06 Jan 2000: > I'm using this: > > bind alias \n " q" "select (tag) current entry and exit" That only works if you have bound to "tag-entry" (like I do). > bind alias \n "" That won't work, but this is what I ended up specifying for myself: bind alias select-entry It

Exiting without applying deletions (was: Applying deletions without exiting)

2000-01-06 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 10:57:06AM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to delete the files tagged as delete without leaving > mutt? [Usually $, but you've probably seen that by now.] This reminded me of something a Pine user mentioned to me as a reason he'

Re: mac-binhex40 encoding

2000-01-06 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Wed, 05 Jan 2000, Andrew J. Schorr wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to handle a MIME attachment that was encoded > using BinHex 4.0? I personally use the program emil (see http://www.spinnaker.de/debian/emil.html) with the following rule in my ~/.procmailrc: :0 * ^Content-Type: multipart/mixe

problem with deleting / syncing

2000-01-06 Thread Sebastian Helms
Hello again, now I've encountered the next problem with mutt... When I mark a message for deletion and quit the mailbox, and later enter it again, the deleted message still is in there. The status has changed back to not-delete. Using $ for syncing the mailbox instantly does not work at all. Do

Re: Exiting without applying deletions (was: Applying deletions without exiting)

2000-01-06 Thread David DeSimone
Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that Pine can keep track of messages flagged as deleted, > between sessions (it adds a header, 'X-Status: D'), so you can mark a > bunch of messages as deleted and they stay marked until you finally > expunge/sync the mailbox. Mutt supports o

Re: problem with deleting / syncing

2000-01-06 Thread David DeSimone
Sebastian Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I mark a message for deletion and quit the mailbox, and later > enter it again, the deleted message still is in there. The status has > changed back to not-delete. Perhaps you have 'set delete=no'? There are four settings for the variable, but

Re: Exiting without applying deletions (was: Applying deletions without exiting)

2000-01-06 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 01:18:47PM -0600, David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It seems that Pine can keep track of messages flagged as deleted, > > between sessions (it adds a header, 'X-Status: D'), so you can mark a > > bunch of messages

Re: Exiting without applying deletions (was: Applying deletions without exiting)

2000-01-06 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 06 January 2000 at 15:12, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 01:18:47PM -0600, David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It seems that Pine can keep track of messages flagged as deleted, > > > between sessions (it ad

Re: Exiting without applying deletions (was: Applying deletions without exiting)

2000-01-06 Thread David DeSimone
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, IMAP handles both sides of this. Just don't purge - messages will > keep their D flags... The last time I checked, Mutt doesn't send flag-changes to the IMAP server until you quit... so the messages can't keep their D flags, because Mutt never sen

one click save/sending?

2000-01-06 Thread Timothy Ball
Is there a way to give vim a single keystroke to at once both save and send a letter in mutt? I love everything else in mutt and I even have a vimrc that makes the status bar behave like my mutt colors but the one thing I miss from the evil pine days was the ability to just hit ^x and send a lette

Re: bind behaves wrong for key

2000-01-06 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi, Thanks for the reply. But I cannot seem to find any documentation on the key . Are the docs on www.mutt.org up to date? Shao. Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I wrote on Thu, 06 Jan 2000: > > I'm using this: > > > > bind alias \n " q" "select (tag) curre

Re: one click save/sending?

2000-01-06 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 08:12:59PM -0600, Timothy Ball wrote: > Is there a way to give vim a single keystroke to at once both save and > send a letter in mutt? I love everything else in mutt and I even have a > vimrc that makes the status bar behave like my mutt colors but the one > thing I miss f