On Feb 12, Philip Mak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I couldn't find the answer in the manual, so I'm asking it here:
>
> How do I make mutt not bother checking PGP signatures on messages
> (since I don't have anyone's PGP keys anyway)?
set pgp_verify_sig=no
msg24450/pgp0.pgp
Description: P
I couldn't find the answer in the manual, so I'm asking it here:
How do I make mutt not bother checking PGP signatures on messages
(since I don't have anyone's PGP keys anyway)?
i created my 2 keys and exported them like it is described here:
http://www.freeos.com/articles/2927/
but when i want to sign and/or encrypt mail, mutt says that i need a
UserID:
I enter the id and press ctrl+g (otherwise this line does not exit!)
then mutt is searching for a user id in an
Ken --
...and then Ken W said...
% I am finally sick of all the ^G stuff in PGP signed emails, so I
...
%
% "Make sure the PGP command formats pass "+language=pgp" to all the PGP
% binaries (but not to pgpring!)"
%
% means. I copied language.txt to my $PGPPATH but don't know what the
% above m
Sorry to ask this of the list, but I don't know what to do with this.
I am finally sick of all the ^G stuff in PGP signed emails, so I
checked out http://www.mutt.org/doc/PGP-Notes.txt but I don't know
what:
"Make sure the PGP command formats pass "+language=pgp" to all the PGP
binaries (but not
* Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000328 13:54]:
> On 2000-03-28 09:28:48 +0200, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> >> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
>
> > What you are trying to view is a PGP/Mime message.
>
> no. It's old-style PGP with little MIME sugar.
Oh, my
On 2000-03-28 09:28:48 +0200, Terje Elde wrote:
>> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
> What you are trying to view is a PGP/Mime message.
no. It's old-style PGP with little MIME sugar.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
* Jon Walthour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000328 08:59]:
> Okay. Stupid user question time. I say this because I'm sure the answer
> is something simple like "install this" or "set that" or something like
> that ... or worse yet, RTFM. I just can't figure it out. So, here goes:
>
> Every now and then,
Okay. Stupid user question time. I say this because I'm sure the answer
is something simple like "install this" or "set that" or something like
that ... or worse yet, RTFM. I just can't figure it out. So, here goes:
Every now and then, I get an email with no body. It just says,
[-- application/p
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 05:36:55PM +0200, Salvatore Greco wrote:
> Why can I not decode this signature ? Please help :)
Because PGP 2.6.x cannot decode 5.x or better signatures?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
"Lotus Notes for Dummies" is surely a single pa
Why can I not decode this signature ? Please help :)
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Jan 25 17:35:45 2000) --]
Warning: Unrecognized ASCII armor header label "MessageID:" ignored.
Timothy Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I already have a pub/secret key using pgp 2.6.2 on my solaris machine
> I wanted to know how do I move that set of keyrings over to my linux
> machine?
Is there some reason you can't just copy the files in your .pgp
directory from one machine to the oth
I already have a pub/secret key using pgp 2.6.2 on my solaris machine I
wanted to know how do I move that set of keyrings over to my linux
machine? I know this is a bit off topic but I wasn't sure where to ask
this. More than likely I'd like to a newer version of pgp or even better
yet gnuPGP. Is
Recently, rex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Try it on this message.
>
Worked like a champ from here (PGP2.6.2).
Cheers...
--
Alex Lane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seabrook, Texas, USA http://www.galexi.com/alex/
TIARA Is A Recu
On 0, J Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In "principle" it doesn't support either idea nor rsa, but in fact it
> does by installing the modules idea.c and rsa.c, and adding to
> ~/.gnupg/options the following:
>
> load-extension idea
> load-extension rsa
For some reason I all of a sudde
J Horacio MG dixit:
> rex dixit:
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 01:42:45AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Try it on this message.
> > [ ... ]
>
> It shouldn't work here, since the pgp block should arrive as a mime
> attachment, and you sent it as part of the main message. Therefor
rex dixit:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 01:42:45AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> >
>
> Try it on this message.
> [ ... ]
It shouldn't work here, since the pgp block should arrive as a mime
attachment, and you sent it as part of the main message. Therefore it
won't even appear with a "K" next
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 09:46:53AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 0, rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try it on this message.
>
> the trouble that I am having is that, when I use ^K, it fires up gpg, but
> it does not give you a chance to see the output, therefore the only way to
> c
Thus wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99.07.17 06:29]:
> On 0, rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > AFAIK there is a keybinding in mutt that allows to extract a
> > > PGP public key. In my help-menu for the index there is a line
> > >
> > > ^K extract-keys extract PGP public keys
On 0, rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK there is a keybinding in mutt that allows to extract a
> > PGP public key. In my help-menu for the index there is a line
> >
> > ^K extract-keys extract PGP public keys
> >
> > Unfortunately if I use the required keys (ctrl + K)
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 01:42:45AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
>
> AFAIK there is a keybinding in mutt that allows to extract a
> PGP public key. In my help-menu for the index there is a line
>
> ^K extract-keys extract PGP public keys
>
> Unfortunately if I use the requi
Wilhelm Wienemann [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> AFAIK there is a keybinding in mutt that allows to extract a
> PGP public key. In my help-menu for the index there is a line
>
> ^K extract-keys extract PGP public keys
>
> Unfortunately if I use the required keys (ctrl + K) this
Hi Jeremy!
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Alex Lane [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > The output in the first line changes appropriately; the last two
> > lines remain, telling me that the signature applies to "another
> > message" and that something (what?) is apparently being sent t
Alex Lane [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The output in the first line changes appropriately; the last two lines
> remain, telling me that the signature applies to "another message" and
> that something (what?) is apparently being sent to /dev/null.
Those messages are due to the fact that Mutt uses
Thus wrote Alex Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99.07.16 10:53]:
[snip]
> Is there a keyring somewhere of public keys of list members?
For now, my public key is on http://elite.dyns.cx/~seymour (will upload it
to my ISP account eventually - this is just on dialup)
No comments about the hostname, a grou
Recently, Adam J Henry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alex Lane [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I have PGP set up with mutt, but get the following output whenever
> > a PGP signed message is encountered in this list:
> >
> > [---...
> > Signature by unknown keyid: 0x.
> > This signature applies
Alex Lane [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have PGP set up with mutt, but get the following output whenever
> a PGP signed message is encountered in this list:
>
> [---...
> Signature by unknown keyid: 0x.
> This signature applies to another message.
> Opening file "/dev/null" type text.
> [--
I have PGP set up with mutt, but get the following output whenever
a PGP signed message is encountered in this list:
[---...
Signature by unknown keyid: 0x.
This signature applies to another message.
Opening file "/dev/null" type text.
[---...
These lines are followed by a signed message.
A
28 matches
Mail list logo
