Hi,
a couple of days ago, people using MS Outlook started complaing that my
messages looked "strange". I asked for an example and received this:
> > Subject: Re: Finanzierung
> >
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
something else happen in your workflow?
It's getting clearer thanks to your explanations: I was unaware of the
difference of s/mime and pgp signing. The mail, I replied to was signed
with s/mime, so replying to it set signing to (S/MIME). When unsetting
and resetting it in my reply it g
flow?
It's getting clearer thanks to your explanations: I was unaware of the
difference of s/mime and pgp signing. The mail, I replied to was
signed with s/mime, so replying to it set signing to (S/MIME). When
unsetting and resetting it in my reply it gets set to (PGP/MIME), the
key is set corre
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11. April 2022 um 12:38:59 Uhr (-0400) schrieb José
María Mateos:
> I have my GPG options here:
>
> $ cat .gnupg/gpg.conf
> default-key 263080EC
> encrypt-to 263080EC
Unfortunately this didn't work here (even after restart). I get the
same error in mutt.
--
Orm
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0200, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
when replying to a signed Email, my response Mail is automatically set
to be signed by me.
Are you doing that via $crypt_replysign or via some other method? Are
you replying to a PGP-signed message to an S/MIME message? The
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0200, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
How do I set the "" value that it uses my HexKey?
I have my GPG options here:
$ cat .gnupg/gpg.conf
default-key 263080EC
encrypt-to 263080EC
There I declare what's my default key and I also tell it to always
encrypt to me too if
Hi,
when replying to a signed Email, my response Mail is automatically
set to be signed by me. The pgp line concerning my key says
"sign as: "
which result in the following error when sending:
"error signing data: General error?"
Unsetting and then resetting Security to &
On Thu Jul 16, 2020 09:07PM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Il 16 luglio 2020 alle 14:58 Trey Sizemore ha scritto:
> > Thanks Francesco. Still not able to verify some keys though.
>
> Can you do that manually with GPG and see if it takes a long time
> on the command line too?
It's not so much the time
Il 16 luglio 2020 alle 14:58 Trey Sizemore ha scritto:
> Thanks Francesco. Still not able to verify some keys though.
Can you do that manually with GPG and see if it takes a long time
on the command line too?
On Thu Jul 16, 2020 06:24PM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Hello Trey,
>
> Il 16 luglio 2020 alle 10:56 Trey Sizemore ha scritto:
> > Do I need to change the server(s) in my gpg.conf file and/or the method
> > by which the key is attempting to be retreived?
>
> I do not use `auto-key-retrieve` myself,
Hello Trey,
Il 16 luglio 2020 alle 10:56 Trey Sizemore ha scritto:
> Do I need to change the server(s) in my gpg.conf file and/or the method
> by which the key is attempting to be retreived?
I do not use `auto-key-retrieve` myself, but I know for sure pgp.mit.edu
has been a little choosy lately.
Hi-
I've only seen this issue recently (and I realize it's not
mutt-specific) but that's where I see it and I know there are many on
the list who have this working well.
On many emails with PGP signatures, attempting to view them with mutt
from the index I get the message '
dress. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ke it HTTPS if you
want to trigger and then bypass the SSL wildcard certificate
mismatch error message.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ot embracing an integrated, PGP solution was that he'd tried it
> before and that it broke wheneve MS issued an update to Outlook.
How many years ago did he try it?
GPG4Win has made vast improvements over the last several years. As
long as the Windows versions in use are relatively current (i.
> I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > > > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
> > > > out of w3m is now properly formatted. Alas, Mutt doesn't recognize it
> > > > and automatically
tachments
(via the quadoption $forward_attachments) for inline forwarding.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt; > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
> > > out of w3m is now properly formatted. Alas, Mutt doesn't recognize it
> > > and automatically decrypt it.
> >
> > I wonder if you could just forward that sanitized block to you
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've given up politely asking
ust text/plain when sending
> > > > to me. It's a losing battle. :(
>
> Since I don't have to deal with PGP, increasingly I wish people
> would just send HTML and dispense with the text/plain. Lynx or
> similar programs work fine inside mutt for HTML mail (if
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
&
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> > Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > > to me. It's a losing batt
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > to me. It's a losing battl
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly ha
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
> > however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check th
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check the
processed output because no sane person would wrap a PGP block in
HTML!
Yes, sorry that
rt for encrypting and
> signing with S/MIME. Perhaps your IT guy would be more open to just
> using a well-documented Outlook feature? As mutt has support for S/MIME
> too, this might be much more workable than insisting on PGP.
I've suggested that before. A few of us even had to use
tion to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> > perhaps piping the -dumped text through cat -s or --squeeze-blank
> > might work - e.g. `w3m -dump | cat -d ...'
> >
> > [1] http://elinks.or.cz/index.html
>
> Oops, I meant: `w3m -dump | cat -s ...'
Thank
using a well-documented Outlook feature? As mutt has support for S/MIME
too, this might be much more workable than insisting on PGP.
On 2020-04-26 08:04,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> perhaps piping the -dumped text through cat -s or --squeeze-blank
> might work - e.g.
On 2020-04-25 21:46,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly ha
Hi,
My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
encypted emails. Consequently, I receive such sensitive material as
traditional
ening mailboxes, because each
message would have to be parsed and scanned.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ding: 8bit
Content-Language: de-DE
X-Envelope-To: g...@unixarea.de
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1630
Lines: 49
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
X
> After using your configration, it still gives me error: Source error
> ~/.config/neomutt/profiles.d/1.rc
>
> It seems something important is missing from the code.
There’s always the chance that copy and paste did mess up something.
Maybe this will fix it for you:
https://pastebin.com/cmJ
f doing it is to have two mutt sessions each running in
screen or tmux, each with different muttrc files with different
identities and different signing defaults. This is how I keep work
emails amd mailing list emails separate.
--
J.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:58:54PM +, Robert wrote:
> > > An example identity could look like this in the profiles.rc:
> > >
> > > macro index 1 'source
> > > ~/.config/neomutt/profiles.d/1.rc'
> > > macro compose 1 'source
> > >
> > > ~/.config/neomutt/profiles.d/1.rccurrent-f
> > An example identity could look like this in the profiles.rc:
> >
> > macro index 1 'source
> > ~/.config/neomutt/profiles.d/1.rc'
> > macro compose 1 'source
> >
> > ~/.config/neomutt/profiles.d/1.rccurrent-from'
> > reply-hook '~C ^per...@example.com$' 'source
> > ~/.c
Subject: Re: Composing ask From: address and arbitrary keys in PGP
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:12:08AM +, g...@riseup.net wrote:
> 1. When composing messages, mutt ask To: or recipient adress and
> Subject: and then go to editor. How to make mutt ask for
> From: or sender address only
o to editor?
>>
> The typical way to do this is with send hooks or folder hooks. Use
> my_hdr in one of those hooks to set the From: line.
It only works on reply messages, but not composing new messages as I
explained in my previous messages about mutt compose
such a feature, which is very important
for multiple identities or email addresses.
If it ask To: and Subject:, why not ask From:? If people do not want it
and prefer to get into editor directly, they can also turn it off.
>
>>2. In PGP, mutt has crypt_opportunistic_encrypt to select keys ba
On 2019-07-27 09:42, Robert wrote:
> On 2019-07-26, 05:12, g...@riseup.net wrote:
>> 1. When composing messages, mutt ask To: or recipient adress and Subject:
>> and then go to editor. How to make mutt ask for From: or sender address only
>> and then go to editor?
>> This is useful for people wit
e gpgme which selects the signing key based on From:
--
J.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2019-07-26, 05:12, g...@riseup.net wrote:
> 1. When composing messages, mutt ask To: or recipient adress and Subject: and
> then go to editor. How to make mutt ask for From: or sender address only and
> then go to editor?
> This is useful for people with multiple accounts or multiple identitie
end hooks or folder hooks. Use
my_hdr in one of those hooks to set the From: line.
> 2. In PGP, mutt has crypt_opportunistic_encrypt to select keys based
> on To: address to the recipient. But PGP also need From: address or
> sender's key to encrypt messages, sign messages or even at
From headers can be
controlled by folder-hook, reply-hook, send-hook, or even macros;
typically via setting my_hdr. $edit_headers is also useful.
See <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#compose-flow> for a (somewhat
terse) overview of message composition.
2. In PGP, mutt has crypt_opportunis
e with multiple accounts or multiple identities in
> each email account if they set custom headers based on each email account or
> identity eg, From: address.
>
> 2. In PGP, mutt has crypt_opportunistic_encrypt to select keys based on To:
> address to the recipient. But PGP also need Fr
based on each email account or
identity eg, From: address.
2. In PGP, mutt has crypt_opportunistic_encrypt to select keys based on To:
address to the recipient. But PGP also need From: address or sender's key to
encrypt messages, sign messages or even attch their own public key. By de
On 2018-09-26 16:23, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > Well I thought about that. But I really want to check the sig _when I
> > am already on the message_. How do I make mutt re-read the message and
> > check the sig in my macro?
>
> set crypt_verify_sig=no
> macro pager ,cs \
> "set crypt_verify_s
cs \
"set crypt_verify_sig=yes\
set crypt_verify_sig=no" "manual-check-signature"
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2018-09-26 21:12, David Woodfall wrote:
> > The ideal solution I dream about is a specific command/keystroke to
> > check the signature of a message, when already viewing that message.
> > Strange as it is this natural command doesn't seem to exist - or am I
> > wrong about this? And if I'm ri
On Wednesday 26 September 2018 10:14,
Ian Zimmerman put forth the proposition:
> Hello mutt lovers,
>
> I still have not found a good way to check PGP signatures. The root
> problem is that many (probably more than half) signatures on mailing
> list messages, including this one,
Hello mutt lovers,
I still have not found a good way to check PGP signatures. The root
problem is that many (probably more than half) signatures on mailing
list messages, including this one, are broken. I have given up on
addressing that root problem, but I would still like to check signatures
Hi mutt list,
here is a funny behavior which might be explainable but let me
nevertheless ask you about.
Changing to one of my mail folders the 's' flag denoting pgp-signed
mails is not displayed for such messages not until I execute 'expunge'
deleted mails from this folder
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:21:56AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Sorry, I may have misunderstood. If you're in the select key menu,
> showing a list of matching keys, you can hit 'q' to exit the menu. It
> should then display a prompt: "Enter keyID for xxx: ". You should then
> be able to hi
then
be able to hit ctrl-g at that prompt and it will bring you back to the
compose menu. C-g is a 'generic' abort key for prompts.
I don't think 1.5.23 was different with this behavior, but it has been a
while since I used that version. :-)
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
;
> You should be able to hit ctrl-g to get out of that prompt and back to
> the compose screen.
C-g doesn't bring me out of that prompt (mutt 1.5.23), urxvt. Is
it a bound function or just a 'generic' key combination?
> > alternatively a way to colour `Security: Encry
screen.
> alternatively a way to colour `Security: Encrypt (PGP/MIME)` red or
> something?
Not currently, but this was suggested in
https://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3915 and I'll be looking into it for a
future release.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 AD
Hello list,
I have `crypt_replyencrypt` and `crypt_autoencrypt` for some contacts.
It works fine, but sometimes I want to send a cleartext email.
Again, most of the times I remember to "clear PGP", but other times
this happens:
1. I start a message to contact xyz
2. I t
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:28:02PM +0200, martin boeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using mutt since a long time ago and started to use pgp
> now. It works fine for me, except one thing: If I get an
> message with an attachment mutt shows me the attachment inline
> only. Like this
Hi,
I'm using mutt since a long time ago and started to use pgp now. It works fine
for me,
except one thing: If I get an message with an attachment mutt shows me the
attachment
inline only. Like this:
...
[-- BEGIN PGP ME
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> muttgpg
> http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147417425713497&q=rawBAD GOOD
Verifies fine for me (in mutt).
Now the question is: is it "just" your setup, or does it fail for
others too
I have the following macro in my .muttrc
macro index hy ":set confirmappend=no delete=yes
auto_tag=yes\n=main/stuff\n:set
confirmappend=yes delete=ask-yes\n"
and I also have
message-hook '!(~g|~G) ~b"^-BEGIN\ PGP\ (SIGNED\ )?MESSAGE"' "exec
check-tradi
hat session key is encrypted with your and the recipients' key. That
> > > way, the message may have a large number of recipients, but doesn't
> > > increase in size as much.
> >
> > This is correct. PGP encryption generates a random symmetric key of
That way,
> > the message may have a large number of recipients, but doesn't increase
> > in size as much.
>
> This is correct. PGP encryption generates a random symmetric key of
> a large size -- essentially a really long password. It encrypts the
> original message
one email, but there is never actual double encryption
>> >on the same text. It is two single encryptions. I think I am
>> >understanding more.
>>
>> As I understand it: your message is encrypted to a session key, and that
>> session key is encrypted with your and the re
it: your message is encrypted to a session key, and that
> > session key is encrypted with your and the recipients' key. That way,
> > the message may have a large number of recipients, but doesn't increase
> > in size as much.
>
> This is correct. PGP encryp
think I am
> >understanding more.
>
> As I understand it: your message is encrypted to a session key, and that
> session key is encrypted with your and the recipients' key. That way,
> the message may have a large number of recipients, but doesn't increase
> in size
t is also
possible to have more pgp recipients than two. Obviously, the de- and
encryption algorithm is designed to support this. But keep in mind, as
more public keys are used the attack vector gets broader. Certainly you
can read how the crypto works (prime numbers) online or try to ask on
the pg
6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
Signal0507 A41B F4D6 5DB4 937D E8A1 29B6 AAA6 524F B68B
93D4 4C6E 8BAB 7C9E 17C9 FB28 03
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 14 Nov 2015 22:58:18 kytv wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 05:45:47PM -0500, Xu Wang wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this
>> > g
On Saturday 14 Nov 2015 22:58:18 kytv wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 05:45:47PM -0500, Xu Wang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this
> > guide: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttGuide/UseGPG
> >
> >
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, jonas hedman wrote:
> On 15-11-14 17:45:47, Xu Wang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this
>> guide:
>> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttGuide/UseGPG
>>
>> There
On 15-11-14 17:45:47, Xu Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this
> guide:
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttGuide/UseGPG
>
> There is a part which discusses about "also encrypt the message using
> the autho
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 05:45:47PM -0500, Xu Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this
> guide:
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttGuide/UseGPG
>
> There is a part which discusses about "also encrypt the message u
Hi,
I am learning more about PGP encryption with mutt, and am following this guide:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttGuide/UseGPG
There is a part which discusses about "also encrypt the message using
the author's public key". This is very useful because now I can
decrypt the mess
A small update on the matter. John was kind enough the send me a
encrypted test email from the iphone app and it worked
perfectly. I could verify signatures and and decrypt it properly from
within mutt automatically without any trouble.
With this in mind I just realized that my friend for weird
Hello! I'm having some trouble decrypting emails from a friend who is
using some kind of Iphone app for PGP.
When I get a encrypted email from this person it usually looks like this:
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:06:17 +0100
From: frend
To: me
Subject: something
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type:
Dear mutt mailing list
Earlier today I had an interesting problem: Whenever I tried to send a
mail with an ascii armored pgp key attached mutt only attached a small
file containing:
Version: 1
I did check that the file I was trying to attach actually contained more
(they were respectively
Dear all,
I am obviously doing something wrong but can't find out what...
I configured mutt to PGP-sign/encrypt (~/.muttrc and ~/.gpg.rc). When sending
out an email interactively, everything works fine: emails get signed and
encrypted by mutt.
But if I am sending a mail via the command
Hello everyone,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 09:48:08PM +0200, Antoine Amarilli wrote:
> The short version of my question is: Is there a way for the
> resend-message command to honor PGP signature/encryption settings
> stored in the target message in the X-Mutt-PGP header?
>
> The reas
Hello everyone,
I'm new to this list, I hope that this is the right kind of questions
and the right place where to ask them.
The short version of my question is: Is there a way for the
resend-message command to honor PGP signature/encryption settings
stored in the target message in the X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:00:37PM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> Compose a mesg, hit ": wq" then hit "p" and see the options.
> Or have you already done that?
Yeah, perfect. I've done it so far, because I'm using
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:00:06AM +0200, The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm
wrote:
snip
> Thanks. The one line configuration works perfectly. The keybinding also
> works to decrypt inline pgp messages as needed.
> This is exactly what I want.
> I also wa
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:45:19AM +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm wrote on Fri, 18 Jul 2014, at 20:04
> (+0200):
>
> > Is there any convenient way to automatically decrypt inline pgp
> > messages? Piping the text attachme
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:11:17PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:04:52PM +0200, The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm
> wrote:
> > Hi mutt users!
> >
> > Is there any convenient way to automatically decrypt inline pgp
> > messages?
>
>
Hello,
* The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm wrote on Fri, 18 Jul 2014, at 20:04 (+0200):
> Is there any convenient way to automatically decrypt inline pgp
> messages? Piping the text attachment to `gpg --decrypt` works,
> but I need a simpler way to do the task.
if you use procmail,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:04:52PM +0200, The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm
wrote:
> Hi mutt users!
>
> Is there any convenient way to automatically decrypt inline pgp
> messages?
set pgp_auto_decode=yes
There's also a (mutt built-in) command to manually decode them (thouh
l
Hi mutt users!
Is there any convenient way to automatically decrypt inline pgp
messages? Piping the text attachment to `gpg --decrypt` works, but I
need a simpler way to do the task. Although inline pgp is deprecated,
many mail user agent such as K9 mail is still using it.
In addition to that
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 06:28:39PM +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone has found a way to automatically enable PGP
> signing for certain recipients only, perhaps through some rule-based
> scheme?
Look at send-hook and crypt-hook, along with $crypt_autoencrypt.
Only tricky
Dear Mutt users,
I am wondering if anyone has found a way to automatically enable PGP
signing for certain recipients only, perhaps through some rule-based
scheme?
best,
Peter
The IMAP server that I have to use does some strange things
to the Content-Type header of PGP-encrypted messages:
A correctly sent message (as generated by mutt) with
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
| boundary="P
Hi,
I sometimes receive messages with an embedded photo and I wonder how
do display it easily from within mutt. On the console the photo can
be viewed using
gpg --edit-key showphoto quit
1) Has someone maybe already written a macro that does exactly this?
2) If not, how do I extract the keyID
Incoming from Andre Klärner:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:34PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > I like to keep date stamped copies of old mutt configs in my ~/mutt.
>
> Well, I used to do so a while ago, but by now I am using a git-repository
Sadly, I'm still working on my git-foo.
> for eac
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:34PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Brandon Sandrowicz:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > [ Btw, mutt will parse ~/.mutt/muttrc if ~/.muttrc doesn't exist. If
> > you dot-prefix your ~/mutt, then you could axe the need fo
Incoming from Brandon Sandrowicz:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised you'd put that in /etc/Muttrc.d; it's all world-
>
> Why would generic gpg commands being world-readable be an issue? Those
Yeah, sorry. I was confusing gnupg with mutt configs.
ncrypt=yes
> > > > set pgp_timeout=1800
> > > > set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
> > >
> > > I have none of this in my .muttrc and have pgp capability. P shows the
> > > pgp menu. This in mutt 1.5.20-9+squeeze2.
>
quot;^gpg: Good signature from"
> >
> > I have none of this in my .muttrc and have pgp capability. P shows the
> > pgp menu. This in mutt 1.5.20-9+squeeze2.
>
> root@tal:~# ls -al /etc/Muttrc.d/
> total 40
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 2 18:56 .
> drwxr-xr
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote:
>
> > set pgp_replyencrypt=yes
> > set pgp_timeout=1800
> > set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
>
> I have none of th
1 - 100 of 1576 matches
Mail list logo
