Eudora breaks atatchments from the messages and keeps them in a directory. Each
mailbox has an index
file which keeps tracks of what belongs to what.
Apologies to he to whome I replied by accident instead of this list.
Quoting Jon Walthour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is another option, as well
There is another option, as well. Get a copy of Eudora (not Eudora Lite) and convert
them through there. I did this some time ago. So, I don't remember all the details.
But Eudora (and I just downloaded a trial version rather than buying it) will convert
the Outlook .pst to standard mail format
Jeff, et al --
...and then Fairlight said...
% On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson thus spoke:
% >
% > I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
Yay! :-)
% > utilities on the net to convert his address book, but I've had no
% > success finding utiliti
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson thus spoke:
> This is more mutt advocacy than usage, and is perhaps more general
> than just mutt. Well, hope it's still appropriate.
>
> I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
> utilities on the net to convert his a
This is more mutt advocacy than usage, and is perhaps more general
than just mutt. Well, hope it's still appropriate.
I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
utilities on the net to convert his address book, but I've had no
success finding utilities for converting the actual
++ 19.03.1999, 18:12:13 (-0800) = Russell Van Tassell:
>If you take a close look at each and every message, you'll notice the
>following consistencies between them:
[...]
> - "Precedence:" is set to "bulk"
But if you have a closer look at other mails as well you will notice
this last one is a ver
This really should be on the Procmail list (send a request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), but... so far, I think
everyone's not right...
If you're trying to use procmail to filter everything on this list in
to a foler, you to go for a header that the list software will
set for every message it sends o
Greetings,
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:23:56PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the
> header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a
> mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However
> Majordomo does _not generate_ it
++ 17.03.1999, 10:18:15 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>:0
>*^TO.*mutt-users@*
>mutt
>
>(just wonder if the dot makes a difference to where you put it).
You mean the dot after TO? That one definatelly does make a difference.
The dot means 'any character except a newline'. The asterix says 'any
sequ
++ 17.03.1999, 16:04:26 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
>
>but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
>other character (*), or?
Nope. Dot means 'any character except newline'. That's what it says in
the manpage for procmailrc.
-Rejo.
-
> The issue here is that ^TO doesn't match sender, which is the
> best way I've found to match majordomo mailing lists.
Agreed.
> If someone bcc's to the list, procmail wont catch it.
Most of the bccs I get are spam, and my last (in order)
procmail recipe puts all bccs in a separate folder
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 05:36:05PM +0100, Klaus Wacker wrote:
> The .* at the end is superfluous, but you probably want to anchor the
> "Sender:" at the beginning of the line. So the line
Point. I forgot the ^.
> * ^TOmutt-(users|announce)@.*(cs.hmc.edu|mutt.org|gbnet.net)
The issue here is th
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
It generates
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can this be
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
It generates
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can this be
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
Most mutt installations will generate
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 04:04:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
>
> but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
> other character (*), or?
No. The regular expression . will match any character. The * will
make zero or more of th
Jeffrey Haas dixit:
>
> I would recommend instead:
> :0:
> * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
> mutt-users
>
> This is much saner in case of bcc's and other things.
but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
other character (*), or?
Horacio.
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Ke
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> :0:
> * ^TO(.*mutt-users)
> mutt-users
>
I would recommend instead:
:0:
* Sender: .*mutt-users.*
mutt-users
This is much saner in case of bcc's and other things.
> -Rejo.
--
Jeffrey Haas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Place all beliefs in
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Rejo dixit:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
>
> I have now (in procmail):
>
> :0:
> * ^TO([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> mutt-users
>
> Which
++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
>Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
>criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
I have now (in procmail):
:0:
* ^TO([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])
mutt-users
Which probably could be rewritten to
:
Someone kindly replied direct suggesting using
mutt -f ~/mail/INBOX as a test. That worked,however while trying to get a
mailboxes entry to work,switching from editor to mutt each time in another
tty, pine got the stitch and deleted all in my INBOX file!
So I lost your address. W
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the
> > header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a
> > mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However
> > Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i have
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:23:56PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:53:14PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> > Ok as above, now could let me know what has to be done to get mutt to see
> > my mail. mutt looks in /var/spool/mail/rjpp which is always empty.
> > I us
> BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the
> header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a
> mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However
> Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
TO_ works pr
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:53:14PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
> Ok as above, now could let me know what has to be done to get mutt to see
> my mail. mutt looks in /var/spool/mail/rjpp which is always empty.
> I use procmail to stash the incoming in ~/mail/INBOX,etc,etc,etc.
> Would m
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Petr Hlustik wrote:
> Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> >
> > Sure you can, just put all folders in a 'mailboxes' line in your .muttrc
>
> I have used the following entries to emulate Pine defaults (I have
> occasionally switched back and forth for a while):
>
> # Make the m
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:49:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> The script is called aladalcurm.py.
> [ALl ADresses ALiassed with CURses Menu]
> It is written using Python (http://www.python.org) and curses.
Personally it's way to clever for me to remember - how about 'take-email.py'
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:41:11AM -0500, Petr Hlustik wrote:
SNIP
>
> There is also a perl script to convert Pine's .addressbook to mutt
> format. I have to admit, I still miss in Mutt the ability of Pine to "take"
> addresses from the body of the e-mails (it can do the From: field).
I was als
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 08:51:44AM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:38:59PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
> >
> > Currently using Pine 4.x. Can I use my existing ~/HOME/mail
> > structure, or should it be rebuilt. If this is a rtfm ask, which doco and
> > where?
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:38:59PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> Currently using Pine 4.x. Can I use my existing ~/HOME/mail
> structure, or should it be rebuilt. If this is a rtfm ask, which doco and
> where?
Sure you can, just put all folders in a 'mailboxes' line in your .
Currently using Pine 4.x. Can I use my existing ~/HOME/mail
structure, or should it be rebuilt. If this is a rtfm ask, which doco and
where?
TIA ---russ---
33 matches
Mail list logo
