Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Knute
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Brian Clark wrote: > * Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 16:26]: > [...] > > When I do a dpkg -S mutt.ncurses it was the mutt-utf8 package that > > created it. Since that is the one that is linked to slang. > OK, here's what I get: > (~)% dpkg -S mutt.ncurses > dpk

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Brian Clark
* Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 16:26]: [...] > The name is mutt.ncurses, and I didn't have do dl anything extra to > have it on here. Don't actually know where it came from to be honest > with you. I do have both slang and ncurses on my machine. And I am > using unstable as well. And

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Knute
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Brian Clark wrote: > * Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 11:04]: > > I'm currently using debian, so I don't know about other distros. What > > I've found is that with debian, there is mutt (linked with slang), > > and mutt.curses (linked with ncurses). As I use kbd sh

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Brian Clark
* Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 11:04]: > I'm currently using debian, so I don't know about other distros. What > I've found is that with debian, there is mutt (linked with slang), > and mutt.curses (linked with ncurses). As I use kbd shortcuts anyway, > I simply set up a shortcut to mu

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Knute
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Mike Schiraldi wrote: > > I know nothing about Ncurses, not even how to see it's version, but > > tried to link with it: The indicator seems to react well. It takes the > > reversed colors the current index line should be. But, for an unrelated > > to your patch reason, t

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-28 Thread Mike Schiraldi
> I know nothing about Ncurses, not even how to see it's version, but > tried to link with it: The indicator seems to react well. It takes the > reversed colors the current index line should be. But, for an unrelated > to your patch reason, the color scheme of all the screen is messed up: > in

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-25 Thread Mike Schiraldi
> This context colored indicator patch seems to have no effect when > Mutt (versions 1.2.5 and 1.3.27) is linked with slang (version 1.4.4). Yow! I'll take a look and post my findings. -- Mike Schiraldi VeriSign Applied Research smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-25 Thread Alain Bench
[followups set to users list only] Hello Mike, On Friday, January 18, 2002 at 2:34:51 PM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote: > indicator.patch changes the behavior of the indicator bar when it is > defined as "mono indicator reverse" (the default). [...] With this > patch, the indicator bar, when

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-22 Thread Mike Schiraldi
The S/MIME patch i posted for 1.3.26 also works with 1.3.27. -- Mike Schiraldi VeriSign Applied Research smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-19 Thread Erika Pacholleck
[18.01.02 14:34 -0500] Mike Schiraldi <-- : > Attached is a version of the S/MIME patch that will work with > mutt-1.3.26. (Or at least it appears to work -- let me know if you have any > problems) Yes, I have dam.. fu... problems with it !!! Did you ever hear that you do not post thousands

Re: S/MIME patch for Mutt-1.3.26

2002-01-18 Thread Pete Toscano
Works well for me. The patches didn't apply without some offsets, but they all applied with no rejs. Thanks, pete On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Schiraldi, Mike wrote: > Attached is a version of the S/MIME patch that will work with > mutt-1.3.26. (Or at least it appears to work -- let me know if you hav