On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Brian Clark wrote: > * Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 16:26]:
> [...] > > When I do a dpkg -S mutt.ncurses it was the mutt-utf8 package that > > created it. Since that is the one that is linked to slang. > OK, here's what I get: > (~)% dpkg -S mutt.ncurses > dpkg: *mutt.ncurses* not found. > (~)% dpkg -l mutt | egrep ii > ii mutt 1.3.27-1 Text-based mailreader supporting MIME, GPG, > Maybe what you decribe is done when one installs both packages (mutt and > mutt-utf8) on the same machine. Yeah, I think so. I didn't know the issues that both could have, so I figured I'ld try them both out. The exact output of the dpkg -S mutt.ncurses is: diversion by mutt-utf8 from: /usr/bin/mutt diversion by mutt-utf8 to: /usr/bin/mutt.ncurses (So I paraphrased before!)
msg23935/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
