* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 17:03 -0400]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
> >
> > The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> > either.
>
> Really? I didn't know what
At 17:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
> >
> > The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> > either.
>
> Really? I didn't kn
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
>
> The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> either.
Really? I didn't know what hide_missing was, so I looked in the
manual and this is what it says:
h
At 16:40 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
> > is set by default.
>
> No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing op
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
> > I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
> > does setting the hide_missing option help?
>
> That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
> is set by default.
No,
At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
> I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
> does setting the hide_missing option help?
That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
is set by default.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sch
At 15:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
> they are both
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 19:03]:
> > I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> > messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> > the child message is a direct reply to the parent.
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 19:03]:
> I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
> they are both replies to a
Yes, this is the intended behavior. It's because mutt displays the
subject if the parent is not visible or missing, on the theory that who
knows what the parent's subject is.
-Daniel
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:05:07PM -0800, Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David Ellement wrote:
> >
David Ellement wrote:
>
> I also see this. Here's an example from this list.
it also seems to happen when the parent moves out of the top of the
display.
173 rDF Mar 22 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1.6K) Fwd: Re: spews collateral damage
174 rDL Mar 22 Dallas Bethune (1.7K) |*>
175 DL Mar 23 J
Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> hmm.. can you type up a sample mailbox which shows this?
> You might attach this mailbox and then we can
> take a look at it with "mutt -f filename" etc.
well i'm using Maildir, so that would be a bit difficult. here's a
better example though (from an earlier off list mess
On 020320, at 15:32:27, Sven Guckes wrote
> hmm.. can you type up a sample mailbox which shows this?
> You might attach this mailbox and then we can
> take a look at it with "mutt -f filename" etc.
I also see this. Here's an example from this list.
--
David Ellement
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Th
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-19 21:27]:
> any idea why the subject is sometimes duplicated in threaded displays?
> it seems to happen mainly when the parent is missing; ie:
>
> 82 DL Mar 18 Ralf Hildebrandt (1.0K) -->Re: SMTP dialog log
> 83 N L Mar 19 Bernd Matthes (1.
On Mon 06-Aug-2001 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Justin R. Miller spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > Which brings me to a question... what does the '&' represent in the same
> > position?
>
> It generally seems to me that it means you have limited your message
> list, and th
Justin R. Miller spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning of
> > the "*" character, when it appears in the child message subject lines
> > in the index. Can anyone tell me what it signifies?
>
> I believe it means that the thread w
Thus spake Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning of
> the "*" character, when it appears in the child message subject lines
> in the index. Can anyone tell me what it signifies?
I believe it means that the thread was implied, ma
Jonathan Irving spake unto us the following wisdom:
> I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning
> of the "*" character, when it appears in the child message
> subject lines in the index. Can anyone tell me what it
> signifies?
It indicates that the denoted message is "sub
18 matches
Mail list logo
