On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:59:46PM +, isdtor wrote:
This is MIT KRB5 1.10. I've tried this on systems with newer versions,
too, with the same result. I am not aware of any configuration specific
to GSSAPI, only Kerberos (and I have a valid ticket).
I'll have to punt on this for now then.
> At this point, I'm just guessing, as I have almost no experience with
> Kerberos. The message above may supply some kind of clue: Server not
> found in Kerberos database. Which GSSAPI library is SASL using? Is it
> possible there is some setup or configuration that library needs to
> fun
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +, isdtor wrote:
[2020-11-05 13:35:13] SASL: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code
may provide more information (Server not found in Kerberos database)
At this point, I'm just guessing, as I have almost no experience with
Kerberos. The mess
> Try running mutt at debug level 2 and see what it prints. There should be a
> message:
> smtp_authenticate: Trying method XXX
> for each method, and then hopefully something inside the SASL authentication
> starting with:
> smtp_auth_sasl:
>
> I don't know what the problem is, but pe
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:48:52PM +, isdtor wrote:
The --with-gss is actually only used for IMAP authentication. For SMTP,
Mutt's (simple) implementation relies entirely on SASL. Is it possible you
don't have the modules installed for SASL's GSSAPI support?
If you're on a Debian derivat
> The --with-gss is actually only used for IMAP authentication. For SMTP,
> Mutt's (simple) implementation relies entirely on SASL. Is it possible you
> don't have the modules installed for SASL's GSSAPI support?
>
> If you're on a Debian derivative, try installing libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:13:40PM +, isdtor wrote:
$work moved to a new email system (in-house exchange). I've managed to
configure mutt for it and can successfully access the mailbox for reading. But
I am unable to send, with a message
No authenticators available
I figured out that th
isdtor writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> $work moved to a new email system (in-house exchange). I've managed to
> configure mutt for it and can successfully access the mailbox for reading.
> But I am unable to send, with a message
>
> No authenticators available
>
> What could be the problem here? I h
El día viernes, octubre 26, 2018 a las 03:47:03p. m. -0500, Hokan escribió:
> This rejection is the result of the "percent hack" implimented on
> sendmail, postfix and, perhaps, other mail servers.
>
> Nothing to do with Mutt.
Yes, it's a bit off-topic. And, thanks for the pointer to that "perce
This rejection is the result of the "percent hack" implimented on
sendmail, postfix and, perhaps, other mail servers.
Nothing to do with Mutt.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:23:22PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is perhaps not a problem with mutt itself, but maybe some expert ca
On 11/08/2014 12:48 PM, John Niendorf wrote:
Dale,
I'm curious, what email provider are you using?
godaddy.com
same as my website
Thunderbird works with it
--
(my whereabouts below)
http://www.dalekelly.org/
Dale,
I'm curious, what email provider are you using?
--
John
On 11/08/2014 01:12 AM, John Niendorf wrote:
Dale,
What happens when you put this in your .muttrc file?
set smtp_url="smtps://your_email_addr...@email.server.com/465"
set smtp_pass="your_password"
same error, but thanks a lot
also tried adding
set smtp_authenticators="digest-md5:cram-md5"
th
Dale,
What happens when you put this in your .muttrc file?
set smtp_url="smtps://your_email_addr...@email.server.com/465"
set smtp_pass="your_password"
--
John
On 11/08/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* DaleKelly [11-07-14 22:57]:
(my ~/.muttrc is below)
I am compiling from source (1.5.1.23)
got the message on the dev list that SSLv3 had a security issue
don't know if a previous version has SMTP
I added --config-pop --config-smtp --with-ssl -
* DaleKelly [11-07-14 22:57]:
> (my ~/.muttrc is below)
>
> I am compiling from source (1.5.1.23)
> got the message on the dev list that SSLv3 had a security issue
> don't know if a previous version has SMTP
>
> I added --config-pop --config-smtp --with-ssl --with-sasl
> to the ./comfigure comma
On 11/07/2014 11:28 PM, David Champion wrote:
* On 07 Nov 2014, DaleKelly wrote:
I get no prompt for username and password
No, you wouldn't because nothing in your configuration indicates
definitively that you want AUTH-SMTP.
I added only one change to the sample.muttrc
and saved it to ~/.m
* On 07 Nov 2014, DaleKelly wrote:
>
> I get no prompt for username and password
No, you wouldn't because nothing in your configuration indicates
definitively that you want AUTH-SMTP.
> I added only one change to the sample.muttrc
> and saved it to ~/.muttrc
> set smtp_url=smtps://smtpout.secur
Nope, just tried it. It didn't work!
Thanks,
Russ
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:15:22PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you set correct password for the 2nd auth
> method (CRAM-MD5), it works OK?
Hello,
unfortunately, it looks like there's no way to
distinguish between the unsupported DIGEST-MD5 and
wrond password for CRAM-MD5 -- the server's reply
is the same:
> 5< 500 5.7.0 Unknown AUTH error -1 (Internal authentication error).
1. (digest)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:46:48AM -0500, Russ
I've never had a problem with my SMTP username before. That and my password
have always been the same and always worked. (And still do when i specify SMTP
authentications explicitly.)
I dunno!
Thanks,
Russ
On 09/17/14, David Champion wrote:
I'm not certain from your debug log, but
I'm not certain from your debug log, but it looks like you may
be setting your SMTP username to "russurquhart1". Try using
"russurquha...@verizon.net" -- your full email address -- as the
username. Larger services (that support multiple virtual or real
domains) often require this.
* On 17 Sep 20
Hi,
I set a wrong password and set the smtp authentication to cram-md5.
Here is, what i think, is the relevant part of the muttdebug file, attached.
Thanks,
Russ
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:03:35AM -0700, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> 5< 500 5.7.0 Unknown AUTH error -1 (Internal
> au
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:46:48AM -0500, Russell
Urquhart wrote:
> I've attached a text file with what i think is
> the relevant text for the smtp failure.
5< 500 5.7.0 Unknown AUTH error -1 (Internal
authentication error).
As I can see, verison's SMTP server fails with a
50
Hi All,
After doing the touch command, and not seeing any results, i look this morning
and there appears to be SEVERAL .muttdebug files.
I wouldn't have thought a touch could have caused that, but there they are.
I've attached a text file with what i think is the relevant text for the smtp
fai
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:49:04PM -0500, Russell
Urquhart wrote:
> I got the +DEBUG when i ran that command.
So you get +DEBUG in the `mutt -v|grep BUG'
output, not -DEBUG?
If you cannot find ~/.muttdebug0 (in your home
directory), then maybe installation paths for the
build have been sc
On 16.09.14 17:49, Russell Urquhart wrote:
> When i went to my ~ directory, and did the touch command, nothing happened.
Please do _all_ of the following: (Here, $ is the shell prompt)
$ cd# Let's just be sure we are in ~
$ touch .muttdebug0
$ ls -a | more # Did you p
Hello Russel and mutt friends,
If ``touch .muttdebug0'' did not create the .muttdebug0 file then I guess
that you are missing the user right to create a file. The touch command is
so basic. If this does not work then that needs attention first.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:49:04PM -0500, Russell Ur
Hi Willy,
I got the +DEBUG when i ran that command.
When i went to my ~ directory, and did the touch command, nothing happened.
I too thought i might not have permission, but i have written things to this
directory.
Does mutt have to be chmod ed to do this? I execute the program, but have neve
Hello Russ,
Just to be clear, the following.
What does ``mutt -v | grep DEBUG'' give?
If the answer is +DEBUG, then ...
>From man mutt:
``If mutt was complied with +DEBUG log debugging output to ~/.muttdebug0. Level
can range from 1-5 and effects verbosity. A value of 2 is recommended.''
Di
Hi again,
I got the lock off my mail, so i am back up and running.
I still cannot generate a muttdebug file. I have checked and recompiled my
versions of mutt. I have started mutt with the -d4 parameter, but still nothing.
Thanks again to everyone!
Russ
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:08:43PM
To all thank you. I discovered that I had not compiled with debug. I thought I
had. Now that I recompiled try and run I keep getting an error "couldn't lock
and then my mail file. I saw this previously but I can't find how I did that
again? Can someone please tell me how to set that so I can get
On 15.09.14 15:49, Willy Offermans wrote:
> >From ``man mutt'':
>
> -- If mutt was complied with +DEBUG log debugging output to
> ~/.muttdebug0. Level can range from 1-5 and effects verbosity. A
> value of 2 is recommended.
>
> Maybe mutt was not compiled with +DEBUG.
And Russel, to check th
* Russell Urquhart [01-01-70 12:34]:
> Hi Tom and all,
>
> I tried using the -d option, (i used -d4) when i started mutt, but i
> STILL didn't get a .muttdebug file. I tried the locate command as was
> also suggested and it returned nothing.
>
> So i'm still trying.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
>
Hello Russel,
>From ``man mutt'':
-- If mutt was complied with +DEBUG log debugging output to ~/.muttdebug0.
Level can range from 1-5 and effects verbosity. A value of 2 is recommended.
Maybe mutt was not compiled with +DEBUG.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:05:07AM -0500, Russell Urquhart wrote
Hi Tom and all,
I tried using the -d option, (i used -d4) when i started mutt, but i STILL
didn't get a .muttdebug file. I tried the locate command as was also suggested
and it returned nothing.
So i'm still trying.
Thanks everyone!
Russ
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 08:52:39PM -0700, Tom Fowle
Just to be sure you created the .debug files, don't forget the
-d#
command line option when envoking mutt to debug. Try to keep the
session as
-short as possible just enough work to show the problem. This keeps the
log
-files more manageable.
The # in the -d option defines the debug level, 0-4
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:42:19AM -0700, Eliana wrote:
> What operating system are you using? If it is a Linux system, you would use
> ls -alt .muttdebug* to list the mutt debug files from the command line. And
> need to do it from the command line, a file viewer will not detect the files,
>
What operating system are you using? If it is a Linux system, you would use ls
-alt .muttdebug* to list the mutt debug files from the command line. And need
to do it from the command line, a file viewer will not detect the files, unless
you possibly symlink to them with non-dot.file names.
Yo
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:06:26PM +0400, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The last log file is in your home directory and it's named `.muttdebug0'.
> It's a dotfile, so `ls' will show it only when run with `-a' or `-A' option.
I have looked all over my drive but i can't find this file
Hello,
13.09.2014, 18:11, "Russell Urquhart" :
> Can someone tell me where these log files are/what their names are?
> I can't seem to find them readily.
The last log file is in your home directory and it's named `.muttdebug0'.
It's a dotfile, so `ls' will show it only when run with `-a' or `-A'
David Champion wrote:
> * On 29 Feb 2012, Chris Burdess wrote:
> > OK, so after a bit more experimentation the symptoms are as follows:
> >
> > I have 2 accounts which I am switching between with account-hook. Both use
> > smtp_url: the first just straight SMTP, the second is SMTPS (the GMail
> >
* On 29 Feb 2012, Chris Burdess wrote:
> OK, so after a bit more experimentation the symptoms are as follows:
>
> I have 2 accounts which I am switching between with account-hook. Both use
> smtp_url: the first just straight SMTP, the second is SMTPS (the GMail
> account). Both use SASL authentic
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> mutt tries DIGEST-MD5 in SMTP AUTH allthough the server does not offer it. As
> a consequence it fails and succeeds on the second attempt when it downgrades
> for CRAM-MD5.
>
> Here's output to show the server does not offer DIGEST-MD5 (I've renabled
> DIGEST-MD5 for the
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:00:45AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Judging from the logfile, I am guessing that Mutt is not actually
> frozen, but waiting for you to fix the authentication problem before
> hitting 'y' (send) again. You can verify this by pressing 'e' to edit
> the message again.
H
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Elias Diem wrote:
> [2011-04-28 14:53:57] Authenticating (PLAIN)...
> [2011-04-28 14:53:57] 5> AUTH PLAIN ...
> [2011-04-28 14:53:57] 5< 535 Incorrect authentication data
> [2011-04-28 14:53:57] SASL authentication failed
> [2011-04-28 14:59:05] You are on the last
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:50:54AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:38:56PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
> >Hello list
> >
> >I use the built-in smtp to send mails. It just works fine if I enter the
> >correct
> >password. If I enter a wrong one, the whole program freezes. My
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:50:54AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:38:56PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
> >Hello list
> >
> >I use the built-in smtp to send mails. It just works fine if I enter the
> >correct
> >password. If I enter a wrong one, the whole program freezes. My
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:38:56PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
Hello list
I use the built-in smtp to send mails. It just works fine if I enter the correct
password. If I enter a wrong one, the whole program freezes. My config:
make sure your mutt binary was compiled with debugging (mutt -v |grep
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:41:19PM +0100, Pau wrote:
>
> Let me profit the occasion and shamelessly ask you two more questions...
>
> I have my addresses defined in a different folder than the default one in
> mutt.
>
> How could I tell mutt to know where to save new aliases?
You're hijacking
> How could I tell mutt to know where to save new aliases?
For this, look at the set alias_file option in the manual. I think that might
help you.
> And how could I tell mutt what is the new default place is to save all
> deleted emails?
> I mean when pressing "s". I get
> Save to mailbo
Hello!
thanks a lot!!!
No, it is not google.
But I was simply missing the "s" in smtp!
It is
set smtp_url = "smtps://p...@anemailserver.com:762/"
and not
set smtp_url = "smtp://p...@anemailserver.com:762/"
Thanks again.
Let me profit the occasion and shamelessly ask you two more questions.
> I have checked, and the port number, passwd etc are all fine.
> What am I missing?
is it google smtp server you are connecting to? and have you tried using
smtps://y...@gmail.com@smtp.gmail.com:nnn if so? i think they require you to
use ssl/tls to connect to their servers.
The SMTP client is a new-ish addition. It doesn't make a real MTA out of
mutt, though, just a MUA that submits mail via SMTP like the GUI ones.
* Robert Holtzman [2009-07-30 23:37]:
> I'm running mutt 1.5.17+20080114. Everything I read online says mutt
> is not an MTA but "mutt -v" shows "+USE_SMTP". Is this
> contradictory? Can someone further my education?
>
> Thanks.
As the manual informs:
5. SMTP Support
Besides supporting tra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 31 at 10:38 AM, quoth Russ Urquhart:
> I am trying to test the sending of an email to myself but i get the
> following error message:
>
> mutt SMTP session failed: 550 5.1.8 invalid/host-not-in-DNS return
> address not allowed
Hmmm
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:53:55AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> What's going on is that mutt is using $tunnel for SMTP as well as for
> IMAP. This is precisely the sort of thing that the account-hook was
> created for. Try this:
>
> account-hook imap://localhost/ 'set tunnel="/usr/local/bin/ima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:57 AM, quoth Kouichiro Iwao:
>I have problem sending email with mutt built-in smtp function.
>I am using mutt 1.5.19 on freebsd machine and I store emails
>in ~/Maildir directory. I set muttrc file like below.
>
>set tunne
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is mutt sending my password as plain text over the internet? I'm using
ssl with my smtp, as in "set smtp_url=smtps://mail.mydomain.com". So
I'm a bit concerned here that it's not working right.
IIRC mutt uses SASL for SMTP AUTH and I also think it negotiates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I send mail from mutt (1.5.18), using mutt's own smtp_url feature
> rather than msmtp, I see a bunch of stuff flash by on the bottom of the
> screen. That "stuff" looks like mutt is contacting the smtp server, etc.
> But I see something that
Hi Ralf,
> +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL_OPENSSL +USE_SSL_GNUTLS
> +USE_SASL +HAVE_GETADDRINFO
Does your client try to establish an encrypted connection to your
SMTP-server? As I sad above I had problems with encrypted connections and
gnutls. Is your mutt self compiled?
On 29-07-07, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>
> Oh I remember I had problems with SMTP-Auth and mutt compiled against
> GnuTLS. I now have mut compiled against OpenSSL and it works.
>
> Perhaps you could show us the output of `mutt -v`?
>
Of course!
kind regards
Ralf
$>mutt -v
Mutt 1.5.16 (2007-06-
Hi Ralf,
> I've updated mutt to 1.5.16 (etch backport) to checkout the new smtp transport
> feature. (Thanks for that!)
>
> The only problem I ran into is when remote smtp smarthosts do not support
> authentication at all (in intranets for example).
Is your mutt compiled against SASL?
> I ge
On 27-07-07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:41:07AM +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> > "SMTP Server unterstützt keine Authentifizierung"
> [...]
> > but the problem remains. Any help on this?
>
> try 'set erromsg-lang=english' ;)
SMTP server does not support authentication
BTW
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:41:07AM +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> "SMTP Server unterstützt keine Authentifizierung"
[...]
> but the problem remains. Any help on this?
try 'set erromsg-lang=english' ;)
On Sunday, 17 June 2007 at 16:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have built 1.5.16 and so far I cannot even complete an smtp
> connection attempt to my isp from 64-bit OpenBSD 4.1.
> Here is my configure setup:
>
> #
> #rebuild mutt *16
> #
>
> make clean
>
> ./configure \
> --enable-smtp \
> --en
I solved the issue.
I will post the solution here for the people that have the same
problem:
1) Need to compile mutt with SASL (and smtp and ssl, of course):
./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-smtp --with-sasl --with-ssl
2) Add the following to your .muttrc:
set smtp_authenticators
> ssl compiled into mutt?
>
> j
Yes:
./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-smtp --with-ssl
--prefix=/opt/mutt
L.
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:18:38AM -0300, it looks like Luis A. Florit sent
> me:
> > > Pals,
> > >
> > > I am trying to use the new SMTP capabilities in mutt
ssl compiled into mutt?
j
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:18:38AM -0300, it looks like Luis A. Florit sent me:
> > Pals,
> >
> > I am trying to use the new SMTP capabilities in mutt 1.5.15.
> > Currently, I am using msmtp to an account configured like this:
> >
> > host smtp.mydomian.com
>
> Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> Subject: SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), "from" header variable
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:29:20 -0700
1) break your lines @ ~72 chars.
2) if you want any replies, why do you make it hard to others to
reply to the list?
> SM
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > < .
> > pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
> > > AUTH CRAM-MD5
> > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdG
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > < .
> > pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
> > > AUTH CRAM-MD5
> > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdG
On 020307, at 10:54:51, Ron da Silva wrote
> Is there a way to get mutt to recognize ... the following content
> types??
>
> Content-Type: Message/External-body;
> name="draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-02.txt";
> site="ftp.ietf.org";
> access-type="anon-ftp";
> direct
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Ron da Silva wrote:
> Is there a way to get mutt to recognize either of the following content
> types?? Should automatically retrieve this doc via email or ftp when I
> open that attachment, but mutt complains instead.
I'm taking a stab at this, but something like a combinat
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Knute wrote:
> I've been following this thread, and I thought I sent a message in, but
> apparently it never made it.
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> > Newbie to Mutt here. I'm just getting started, and I'm trying to get a working
> > rc file set up. I thi
I've been following this thread, and I thought I sent a message in, but
apparently it never made it.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> Newbie to Mutt here. I'm just getting started, and I'm trying to get a working
> rc file set up. I think I have all the basics except that my ISP r
[26.02.02 12:11 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- :
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
> > [25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- :
> > > This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument
> > > keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
> [25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- :
> > This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument
> > keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so tired now as to seem almost
> > pre-recorded. (Where do you
[25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- :
> This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument
> keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so tired now as to seem almost
> pre-recorded. (Where do you guys get that propaganda anyway?)
This kind of propaganda is unwillingl
On 2002.02.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In other words, this looks like a mutt bug.
>
> You might try setting $pop_authenticators to work around this. The goal
> would be not to try authenticating with MD5 -- for example:
>
> set pop_
On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> < .
> pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
> > AUTH CRAM-MD5
> < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdGVtYWlsLmFjZXdlYi5uZXQ+
> mutt_sasl_cb_authname: getting authname for pop3.ispwest.com:11
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:36:49PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 23/02/02 Jerry Van Brimmer did speaketh:
>
> > Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as
> > much or more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could
> > just download all messages into
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:27:15 +0100
> Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri Feb 22, 2002 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> > [...snip...]
> > > # POP
On 23/02/02 Jerry Van Brimmer did speaketh:
> Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or
> more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all
> messages into my mailbox and the headers would be displayed in the index, sort
> of just li
Don't you want set pop_user=jerryvb?
Joel
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:44:33PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working?
>
> # POP #
> set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED
OK, I found the debug output file, here it is:
Mutt 1.3.22.1i started at Sat Feb 23 13:04:12 2002
.
Debugging at level 3.
< +OK VopMail POP3 Server 5.2.203.0 Ready <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CAPA
< +OK Capability list follows
< TOP
< USER
< UIDL
< RESP-CODES
< EXPIRE 1 USER
< SASL LOGIN NTLM SCRAM-MD
OK, did that. Where do I find the output?
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:51:16 -0600
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working?
> >
>
So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working?
# POP #
set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
set pop_pass = "password"
set pop_delete = no
set pop_host = "pop3.ispwest.com"
#set pop_port = 110
#set pop_last =
On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or
> more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all
> messages into my mailbox and the headers w
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 05:21:24PM +0100, Martin Karlsson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> If what you're trying to do is simply to fetch all messages from the
> POP-server to a local mailbox, though, I'd suggest using something like
> Fetchmail (http://tuxedo.org/~esr/fetchmail/), as indeed The
> Friendly
Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or
more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all
messages into my mailbox and the headers would be displayed in the index, sort
of just like all others, i.e. Sylpheed. I thought Mutt was a do
I came in late to this conversation, but..
Have you tried just to telnet to your pop server and see what happens?
For example, here is a typical transcript from a telnet session to my pop
server.
telnet netmail.home.com 110
Trying 24.0.95.143...
Connected to femail.sdc1.sfba.home.com.
Escape chara
On Sat Feb 23, 2002 at 08:12:57AM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
[...snip...]
> I'm brand new to Mutt, so any advice is welcome.
Well, I don't use POP myself, so I haven't tried mutt's
pop-functionalities. However, I'm sure others can be of assistance
with this.
If what you're trying to do i
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:27:15 +0100
Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Feb 22, 2002 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> [...snip...]
> > # POP #
> > set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> [...snip...]
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:27:15PM +0100, Martin Karlsson wrote:
> The 'USER: unknown' bit makes me think you should try just:
>
> set pop_user = "jerryvb"
>
> Otherwise the POP-server thinks you're trying to log in as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@pop3.ispwest.com.
I don't think that's the problem. I tr
On Fri Feb 22, 2002 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
[...snip...]
> # POP #
> set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[...snip...]
> Every time I try to read my mail Mutt says that login failed:
>
> "Login failed. USER:
On 2002-01-16 14:56:45 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
>postfix doesn't attempt this by default, even if built with SASL,
>but i don't think it would be terribly difficult to get this setup
>with postfix either.
It's easy: Install a sufficiently recent version of postfix on your
computer. Add th
I'll give it a shot, but as I understand it, according to RFC 2554, any
MTA that receives an authenticated email will forward that authentication. So,
is there a way to get Mutt to send an authenticated email to my local server?
I found a page on doing this with Exim as well, but I'm won
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> I know Mutt does not deliver mail, but Rogers just switched to
> requiring smtp authentication and I'd prefer to smarthost through
> them. Is anyone aware of an smtp server that does authentication?
sendmail, i'm pretty sure does (i know cause i'm dealing with tryin
IMHO opnion you are asking the wrong questions.
Whay is it so difficult to use Postfix to receive SMTP
mail ? I do.
--
Regards
Cliff
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
