On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:02:37PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:54:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
The date you see with an "ls -l" is called "mtime", time of last
modification of the entries data. If
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:54:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > Is there any way that one can overcome this major disadvantage of
> > maildir?
> >
> > Since maildir messages are saved in sub-directories of the named
> > 'maildir direc
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Is there any way that one can overcome this major disadvantage of
maildir?
Since maildir messages are saved in sub-directories of the named
'maildir directory' there seems to be no practical way to do sorting
of maildirs on anything bu
* Paolo Pisati [18.10.2012 10:43]:
> i don't know what's your problem but i can give you a suggestion: use
> offlineimap.
Thanks for your feed back. I just started using offlineimap for my
private mail account. Haven't done it for my work mails yet since I
cannot just download all of the folders
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:32:01PM +0200, Chris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I start mutt to connect to my IMAP account at work (which is a
> David / Tobit server) mutt downloads the headers of my approximately 700
> mails in my inbox within a minute or so. When it is afterwords sorting
> the mailbox it
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:22:34PM -0700, Hannes Blut wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I just registered to this mailing list so i can finaly start using mutt.
>I installed mutt-sidebar from the archlinux aur and got offlineIMAP to work.
>
>Now when i start mutt i just get this one line followed by my prompt:
>So
> Sounds like you might be interested in mairix:
>
> http://www.rpcurnow.force9.co.uk/mairix/
Thanks for the suggestion, but this utility amounts to a search and
indexing tool in Maildir, but a mail directory is not where my files
(not all obtained bia SMTP) are located. Because I work topically
On 2009-05-07, jac...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:31, Haines Brown
> > To save a message in mutt, if I hit the "s" key I'm prompted
> > for a mailbox. However I'm used to saving messages as a plain text
>
> I was super confused on this same issue for a while. Every so often i
> ne
* Haines Brown on Friday, May 08, 2009 at 07:28:39 -0400
> Sorry to have dragged things off topic, but in short, my immediate
> question was resolved, which is that I can name a message whatever I
> want and subsequently move it from ~/Mail to where I want it. I work
> on material in terms of their
> That's probably more information than you needed, but maybe that helps
> you understand why mutt is doing what it's doing.
No, Kyle, the information was useful. Thank you.
> Hmm. Okay, I have a better idea of *what* you're doing, but still not
> *why* you're doing it. Is this large and comple
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:31, Haines Brown
> To save a message in mutt, if I hit the "s" key I'm prompted
> for a mailbox. However I'm used to saving messages as a plain text
I was super confused on this same issue for a while. Every so often i
need a plain text copy of an email with headers and e
> So, either put mutt in a room with a corner (e.g. set up gpg
> correctly) OR don't tell mutt to stand in a corner whenever messages
> with signatures show up (e.g. set crypt_verify_sig=no).
>
> Does that make sense?
Yes, it sure does! Had no idea.
> > However I'm used to saving messages as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 7 at 05:00 PM, quoth Haines Brown:
>> So, either put mutt in a room with a corner (e.g. set up gpg
>> correctly) OR don't tell mutt to stand in a corner whenever messages
>> with signatures show up (e.g. set crypt_verify_sig=no).
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 7 at 01:31 PM, quoth Haines Brown:
> I guess the most straightforward procedure would be to rely on
> procmail to direct incoming mail to differet inboxes that rmail and
> mutt can access.
Probably, yup.
> You were kind to reply,
Kyle, I've got a lot to learn about mutt :-(. I guess the most
straightforward procedure would be to rely on procmail to direct
incoming mail to differet inboxes that rmail and mutt can access.
You were kind to reply, but your message starts with the set of lines
below. Were you trying to tell me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 7 at 09:14 AM, quoth Haines Brown:
>>> I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail
>>> servers.
>>
>> And it's delivered to different mail folders?
>
> That's the problem. While I can tell mutt to read the mail in a
Hi,
* Haines Brown wrote:
> That's the problem. While I can tell mutt to read the mail in a
> specific mail folder, I need to somehow to send mail addressed to a
> particular domain into that folder in the first place. I suppose I
> need to turn to procmail for that.
Yes. Or really ugly folder-h
> > I started with the idea I could configure mutt to accomplish the goal
> > I describe below, but I'm not sure I can.
>
> Why not?
>
> > I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail servers.
>
> And it's delivered to different mail folders?
That's the problem. While I can tell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 6 at 05:29 PM, quoth Haines Brown:
> I started with the idea I could configure mutt to accomplish the goal
> I describe below, but I'm not sure I can.
Why not?
> I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail servers.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, June 15 at 08:40 PM, quoth Don Raikes:
> Another newbie question:
> How do I sort incoming mail by threads. I have looked in the mutt
> manual but haven't found this trick yet.
To sort *any* mailbox by threads, do this:
set sort=thre
> Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading whilst viewing
> messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
>
> folder-hook . \
> "set sort=reverse-threads ;\
> set sort_aux=last-date-received ;\
> set duplicate_threads=yes ;\
Not reall
0n Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
>=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Fri 30.May'08 at 11:38:20 +0800 -=
>
>> Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading
>> whilst viewing messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
>
>So you want a threaded sc
=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Fri 30.May'08 at 11:38:20 +0800 -=
> Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading
> whilst viewing messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
So you want a threaded scored view or a scored threaded view?
Anyway, the best you can get is sort=threads, sort_aux
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date
> of newest message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key?
> If yes, how can I setup it?
> If no, this is a feature request. :)
Your version of mutt is o
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date of newest
> message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key? If yes, how can I
> setup it? If no, this is a feature request. :)
Set the below variables in ~/.muttrc.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:28:37PM +, Dave Evans wrote:
> > Now, if hdr_order was able to intepret lack of an argument as
> > "sort everything in alphabetical order"... Or perhaps a trailing
> > "*" as "sort any other headers in alphabetical order"...
>
> That would indeed be useful. Or regex
On 2007-10-19 22:28 +, Dave Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > Collecting the names of all the headers in either email, sorting
> > them and feeding them to hdr_order is as time-consuming as the
> > shell hackery I'm doing now and it's more error-p
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Collecting the names of all the headers in either email, sorting
> them and feeding them to hdr_order is as time-consuming as the
> shell hackery I'm doing now and it's more error-prone.
Yeah, but your config (loaded at startup, or w
On 2007-10-19 19:16 +, Dave Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in
> > case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer.
> >
> > It's something I regularly need when I'm look
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in
> case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer.
>
> It's something I regularly need when I'm looking for headers to
> distinguish between list posts and
On 2007-10-19, Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in
> case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer.
>
> It's something I regularly need when I'm looking for headers to
> distinguish between list posts and list a
On 25Sep2007 21:52, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tuesday, September 25 at 08:29 PM, quoth Joseph:
| >I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
| >mail.
| >Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
|
| Procmail is a delivery
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-01-70 11:34]:
> Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
Yes, you can use procmail via hooks. Write a hook to pipe a copy of
your outgoing mail thru a *special* procmailrc containing recipies
reflecting your intent. The process would
> Procmail is a delivery agent; it only handles incoming mail.
> Automatically sorting outgoing mail (i.e. putting mail into different
> folders as it is sent) requires send-hooks.
While it's true that procmail can act as a delivery agent, it can also
filter any mail that you feed into it. If y
> Procmail is a delivery agent; it only handles incoming mail.
Very true. Ergo, if you /want/ to use procmail to sort outgoing mail,
then make it also be incoming mail. Namely, you can BCC yourself, and
in your procmail recipes check to see if you are the sender.
One downside of doing this tho
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:29:00PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
> mail.
> Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
AFAIK, you'll need to use hooks. A good option is to save outgoing mail
is save it in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 25 at 08:29 PM, quoth Joseph:
>I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
>mail.
>Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
Procmail is a delivery agent; it only handles i
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:11:40AM -0700, Peter Gelbman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> > I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> > However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> > it was received. In ot
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> it was received. In other words, if a user has the wrong time or date
> on their machine, it
> Is there a way to have mutt sort it by the date received instead of
> the date sender marks it with?
Sure is:
Sort (d)ate/(f)rm/(r)ecv/(s)ubj/t(o)/(t)hread/(u)nsort/si(z)e/s(c)ore?:
^^
--
Mike Schiraldi
VeriSign Applied Research
msg28925/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
You want to sort by (r)ecv (that is, date RECeiVed),
rather than sort by (d)ate, which sorts by the Date: header.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:03:19PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 14:00]:
> > Hello again,
> > I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt.
> > I currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads,
> > and t
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 14:00]:
> Hello again,
> I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt.
> I currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads,
> and then by date. For example, some of my folder have no threads at
> all, and I'd
I know you csan do it like this, but it adds an extra function call to
the common case: right now we get by with just one function call except
when the primary sort doesn't match.
Another thing we could do is combine all the sort methods into one big
function with a loop and a case statement.
It
1. I agree that this is a good compromise for the need of sorting for
index.
* 2. And I concern a pre-mentioned sorting need - about file browser. We
need at least two levels: folder/file and then name. Could this be
considered to improve at the same time?
3. About qsort, (I don't know
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> and then sort and sort_aux are what's used for secondary and tertiary
> sorting, or primary and secondary if threads=off. Make sense to people?
I think it would do it. (at least for me :-)
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:34PM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> I suggest
> sort=thread
> sort_aux=score
> sort_aux_aux=subject
> sort_aux_aux_aux=date
> sort_aux_aux_aux_aux=...
*g* that was also my first intension ... but _who_ the hell
should count all the _aux ? :-))
--
Christian Ordig
Ge
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:20:34PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Feb 06, Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I've been planning to do this for a while.
> >
> > It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting
> > is useful is when the firs
On Feb 06, Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I've been planning to do this for a while.
>
> It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting
> is useful is when the first level is threads. If anyone can give me a
> plausible scenario where they'd want more than t
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:31:55PM -0500, darren chamberlain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on
>02/06/2002:
> > I've been planning to do this for a while.
> >
> > It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of
> > s
Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on
02/06/2002:
> I've been planning to do this for a while.
>
> It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of
> sorting is useful is when the first level is threads. If
> anyone can give me a plausible scenario w
> threads=forward
> threads=reverse
> or
> threads=off
>
> and then sort and sort_aux are what's used for secondary and tertiary
> sorting, or primary and secondary if threads=off. Make sense to people?
I agree, and that would work for me.
KEN
msg24242/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Which is more likely to be implemented? (I'm thinking there must have
> been a reason for only allowing two criteria in the first place, and it
> might have been to avoid the complexity of dealing with an ar
I've been planning to do this for a while.
It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting
is useful is when the first level is threads. If anyone can give me a
plausible scenario where they'd want more than three, or more than two
unthreaded, I'll think about my approach.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Christian Ordig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> >sort=thread
> >sort_aux=subject
> >sort_aux2=date
> >
> > implying a fixed number of sort criteria, just more than are
> > avail
> Aside from the (IMHO good) sense of the multiple sort fields just one
> comment to the original poster. Even if implemented, I think your
> problem wouldn't be solved.
>
> When sorting by "thread/subject/date" the subject has to be the same for
> sub-sorting by date. But in your case the subje
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> >
> >sort=thread/subject/date
Aside from the (IMHO good) sense of the multiple sort fields just one
comment to the original poster. Even if implemented, I think your
problem wouldn't be solved.
When sorting by "thread/su
> is just _which_ number this should be. Imagine a mixture of your and
> my scenery ... this could result in something like:
> sort=thread
> sort_aux=score
> sort_aux2=subject
> sort_aux3=date
No, no, that syntax is all wrong.
I suggest
sort=thread
sort_aux=score
sort_aux_aux=subject
sort_aux_a
> I think a fixed maximum number would be easier to handle the question
> is just _which_ number this should be. Imagine a mixture of your and
> my scenery ... this could result in something like:
> sort=thread
> sort_aux=score
> sort_aux2=subject
> sort_aux3=date
>
> or
>
> sort=thread/score/s
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
>sort=thread
>sort_aux=subject
>sort_aux2=date
>
> implying a fixed number of sort criteria, just more than are
> available now. Second:
>
>sort=thread/subject/date
>
> implying an arbitrary number of sort crite
> > > I guess what I'm looking for is a way to sort by thread/subject/date
> > > rather than just thread/subject. It doesn't look like I can use sort
> > > and sort_aux to do this. Anyone have a suggestion for some other way to
> > > accomplish this (other than just using procmail to put these t
On Feb 06, Christian Ordig [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:40:48PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > I guess what I'm looking for is a way to sort by thread/subject/date
> > rather than just thread/subject. It doesn't look like I can use sort
> > and sort_aux to do this.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:40:48PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> I guess what I'm looking for is a way to sort by thread/subject/date
> rather than just thread/subject. It doesn't look like I can use sort
> and sort_aux to do this. Anyone have a suggestion for some other way to
> accomplish
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:40:48PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> I guess what I'm looking for is a way to sort by thread/subject/date
> rather than just thread/subject. It doesn't look like I can use sort
> and sort_aux to do this. Anyone have a suggestion for some other way to
> accomplish
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:25:06AM +0200, Xavier Bertou wrote:
> Hi all,
> there is something I couldn't get from the sort and sort_aux
> combinations. I'd like to have the messages in my mailbox sorted by
> thread, and then by date, but the sorting by date would be using the
> latest message for
Cyrus _is_ the IMAP server, so the filtering via procmail has to take place
on the server.
-Justin
Thus spake Jack McKinney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> > you don't necessarily
On Wednesday, 14 February 2001 at 09:56, Jack McKinney wrote:
> Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> > you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
> > been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for ab
Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
> been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
> to run fetchmail as root so that it can ca
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it can call Cyrus' deliver
program (or otherwise set up the right
Big Brother tells me that Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> Another solution is to use a imap filter, called sieve.
> I've seen it only by Cyrus IMAP-Server in a newer version than
> 2.0.x.
> http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/
OK, I'll check it out. I was think that since mutt had all kinds of
hooks
Hello Jack,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:05:09PM -0600, Jack McKinney wrote:
> I am using mutt to connect to an IMAP server. I'd like to have mutt
> automatically grab new mail and put it into separate IMAP boxes, somewhat
> the way that procmail can sort your incoming mail into separate boxes.
* On Tue Jan 30 2001, Andreas Grytz screamed:
-> Hi,
->
-> I was looking for a hint, wether I can move messages to several
-> folder automatically. I read the documentation forward and
-> backwards, but I can' figure out. Must i do it with procmail?
->
-> Thanks a lot,
->
-> Andreas
->
-> --
I wrote a line for the manual to make this clear(er) for new users.
(or should manual patches be submitted elsewhere?)
--
Wouter Verheijen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- manual.txt Mon Oct 16 16:24:47 2000
+++ manualupd.txt Fri Nov 10 14:35:04 2000
@@ -1151,6 +1151,10 @@
folder-hook
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 12:49:57AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
>> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
>> Maybe this should be added?
>
>Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
> Maybe this should be added?
Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don't remember
if this is stated anywhere in the manual specifically, if
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote:
> Right! This was exactly what I had. Thanks.
> I assumed that the dot was just the default, which gets executed when
> there was no other match.
> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
> Maybe this
i> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Nov
09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> I
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Well, the hook is executing, if you get the error.
> I would try what was suggested in the other mail, create a minimal
> .muttrc and try to get it work with that.
Yes the hook is executing. But I'm guessing he has another hook th
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> > folder-hook . set sort=threads
> No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
> putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error
> message.
> It looks like the sort command doesn't do anyth
Wouter Verheijen muttered:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
> >
> > folder-hook . set sort=threads
> No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
> putting some garbage (like folder-hoo
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
>
> folder-hook . set sort=threads
No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error
message
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000:
> I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to
> ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success.
> Nasty thing it is...
Hmm, ok. Strange.
Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
folder-h
I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to
~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success.
Nasty thing it is...
--
Wouter Verheijen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mikko Hänninen muttered:
> If that doesn't help, you might just want to try "folder-hook mutt",
> without the =. Of course that has the drawback that it would also
> match "mutt-dev", in fact anything with "mutt" in the name.
=mutt matches mutt-dev, too. If fact it matches every string with
has
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 07 Nov 2000:
> folder-hook =mutt set sort=threads
>
> but it just doesn't work.
One thing to check is that you specify $folder *before* this, and that
you don't change it afterwards... The = is expanded when the command
is seen, and if you chan
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 03:04:18PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote:
> When I choose to have folder displayed by threads, the viewer then sorts
> trheads based on the time of the oldest message in the thread. I'd
> rather have it so that the threads themselves are sorted based on the
> date of the m
Frederik Strauss muttered:
> Is there a way for me to sort according to score and still have threads?
> Is there any way of doing it?
I don't use scoring but maybe set sort_aux=score helps?
HTH,
Michael
--
Every program is a part of some other program, and rarely fits.
PGP-fingerprint: DECA E
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Frederik Strauss wrote:
> So I can see important stuff before i read interesting
> stuff.
Simply sort mails directly to you into different folders, than mail
going to mailing lists... that's the way I do it.
cu.
--
Christian Ordig | Homepag
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 01:53:41PM +0200 or thereabouts, Frederik Strauss wrote:
> Hi All
> Is there a way for me to sort according to score and still have threads?
> I have set up scores so that mail to me get a higher score than
> mail to mailing lists. So I can see important stuff before i read
>From the mutt manual, section 6.3:
sort
Type: string
Default: date-sent
Specifies how to sort messages in the index menu. Valid values are
date or date-sent
date-received
from
mailbox-order (unsorted)
score
size
subject
threads
to
You may optionally use the reverse- prefix to specify reverse
Josh Rodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999:
> This will work, and is the best idea probabaly. "S" is unused, and it
> seems reasonable. I had imagined I could control what the '=suggestion'
> would be on the line, which would require the least training...
You can do that too, wit
* Ronny Haryanto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991114 05:12]:
> On 13-Nov-1999, Josh Rodman wrote:
> > Thus i created ~/Mail/sent. I want two main things:
>
> > A) all automatically saved mail should drop into this directory
Ahh, I now understand things quite a bit better.
This is easily achievable give
On 13-Nov-1999, Josh Rodman wrote:
> B) I hope to additionally cause mindless use of 's [return]' from the
> index to drop main into this directory as well named as per default by the
> sender. Of course I want to be able to ovveride this on a case-by-case
> basis.
I would create a macro for thi
Telsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 02 Oct 1999:
> I gather checking the entire message body would be a very big job
> and result in slowing things down.
and
> I'm not desperate to sort on message bodies
I actually use l(imit) with a ~b pattern quite frequently to locate some
messages from
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 09:38:17AM -0400 or thereabouts, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:08:56PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > Telsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 01 Oct 1999:
> > > I'm having some difficulties with the sorting by score ability of M
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:08:56PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Telsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 01 Oct 1999:
> > I'm having some difficulties with the sorting by score ability of Mutt.
>
> Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
> every p
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:08:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
(in a lightning-fast response)
> Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
> every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
> sound likely or make any sense (what's di
Telsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 01 Oct 1999:
> I'm having some difficulties with the sorting by score ability of Mutt.
Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
sound likely or make any sense
100 matches
Mail list logo
