Hi Kyle,
On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 20:28:25 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> setting $from in a send-hook wasn't possible before version 1.5.17.
> That's a useful change that should probably be documented better.
Exactly: We can thank Aron Griffis for making this work. And the
UPDATING fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 25 at 06:47 PM, quoth Alain Bench:
>>| send-hook . 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>| send-hook ~l 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> Does anything speak against this?
>
>That's perfect for you, on the latest Mutt. But setting $from in
>a send-h
Hi Alain
Alain Bench [Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:47:23PM +0100]:
> Don't change, Dominik. I'm speaking for others.
Thanks for making that clear.
Dominik
--
Dominik Meister
My public GnuPG key is available at http://www.meisternet.ch/gpg.txt
Hello Dominik,
On Monday, March 24, 2008 at 16:18:24 +0100, Dominik Meister wrote:
>| send-hook . 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>| send-hook ~l 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Does anything speak against this?
That's perfect for you, on the latest Mutt. But setting $from in
a send-hook wasn't possible
Kyle Wheeler [Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:36:31AM -0500]:
> But like I said, if your configuration works, then stick with it!
The reason why I chose the "set from" way is that I did not find out how
to unset a custom header within a minute ;)
Thanks for helping,
Dominik
--
Dominik Meister
My public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, March 24 at 04:18 PM, quoth Dominik Meister:
>> Thanks Kyle, I think I've already once tried using a send-hook, but
>> that somehow messed up with the reverse_name setting. I give it
>> another try.
>
> I just tried it and what happened is
Dominik Meister [Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:09:25PM +0100]:
> Thanks Kyle, I think I've already once tried using a send-hook, but that
> somehow messed up with the reverse_name setting. I give it another try.
I just tried it and what happened is that after sending mail to a
mailing list, all message
* On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> send-hook mutt-users@mutt.org \
> my_hdr From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And never forget your default hook :)
HTH,
Michael
--
Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and
when it
Kyle Wheeler [Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 08:32:56AM -0500]:
>
> As you have observed, and as it was mentioned in that email thread,
> this is because the mailing list does not include your email address
> in any of the headers (except in an encoded form as the return value).
> If it gets into the hea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, March 24 at 12:29 PM, quoth Dominik Meister:
> However, if I reply to mailing lists (for example this one), mutt
> does not recognize, that the message has been sent to one of the
> addresses I configured using alternates and is just using
* Ken Dyke on Wednesday, June 06, 2007 at 23:03:26 -0600:
> Just upgraded from Fedora Core 6 to Fedora 7 and now I get an error
> regarding a line in .muttrc "alternates: unknown variable".
"alternates" has become a /command/ like "lists", "subscribe" in
more recent Mutt versions.
c
--
Python Mu
* Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-29 04:44]:
> I do not understand the intended usage of the alternates
> configuration variable. The manual says that it "affects
> Mutt's idea about messages from you and addressed to you."
by setting "alternates" mutt knows your email addresses -
Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 08/08/2001:
> I've finally figured out that 'reverse_name' isn't working because my
> alternates line isn't matching properly. I have it written as:
> set alternates =
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL P
* Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> set alternates="[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My alternates setting works fine that way.
In addition, I have my '@' symbols escaped.
set alternates="phineas\@only-linux.com|skwerl\@telocity
--
Drew
* Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Apparently that doesn't work well (even with the '.' escaped), nor does:
> set alternates =
> "(phineas@only-linux|skwerl@telocity|skwerl@eathlink|skerl-0@home)" with
> or without quotes.
Try removing the parentheses:
set alternates="[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EM
Baurjan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
> i've searched the archive but couldn't find anything related:
> most of my correspondents use more than one address to write to me. i
> want to reverse_alias them so the index looks uniformly. i don't want to
> setup aliases for ea
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
> > alternates dre@chronic\.net
> > alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
> Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
> supported regular expressions. Once th
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>
:> Wishlist?
:
:No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list?
I just did. It took a while to find it, and it's actually located under
Sven's home page and not the Mutt ho
Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
>
> alternates dre@chronic\.net
> alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added
On 1999-11-12 08:16:58 +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been
> changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at
> http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info.
Looks quite interesting. Please donate it
Hi Rejo!
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima:
> >> My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
> >> header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is
> >>
> >Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
Hi David!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts
> > > the header 'X-Status: D'.
> >
> > Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
>
> Alas, my current mail filter is a
++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima:
>> My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
>> header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is
>>
>Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
I have same kind of setup. I have procmail check for a some
* Nathan Cullen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991112 00:37]:
> .. I can setup mailboxes like:
> mailboxes =drdre
> mailboxes =snoopdogg
> And the same goes for "lists".
> Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
It's a historical thing. ;-)
> alternates dre@chronic\.net
> alt
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 11:33:29AM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
>
> Well, if you do like many hackers, and try to make a "clever" regexp,
> it's probably going to be hard to read. But there's no reason you can't
> just make a "simple" regexp that does the same thing.
> set alternates='^(fox|
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 07:52:14PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> And then I'd like to be able to have mutt show
> "/var/mail/guckes" as eg "MAILBOX" - much shorter.
>
I don't know about "MAILBOX", but I wouldn't mind seeing it replaced
with the "!" shortcut.
--
==
Na
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 15:19:38 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> Btw, mutt would be a LOT more useful for many people
> if there was an additional flag for your work addresses.
>
> Example: set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Work mails" would then show up with a 'W'
> and would be selectable with "~W".
>
Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts
> > the header 'X-Status: D'.
>
> Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
Alas, my current mail filter is a home-brewed perl script, which is easy
for me to tweak and modify, sinc
Hi David!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> > In the end I want that the 'X' flag actually shows possible spams; and
> > work related mails are usually not spam. ;-)
>
> My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
> header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I ent
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most people do not use a mail filter. For them it is nice to
> handle both personal *and* work related mails from the mailbox.
Mutt is not, nor is it intended to be, the "Emacs" of the MUA world.
This is the Unix world, where discrete, simple tools wor
* Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99 18:39]:
> > set alternates='^([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$"
> BTW, aren't the .'s in the regexp supposed to be escaped, if you want
> them to match just a dot? Admittedly in most cases it doesn't make much
> difference in the $alternates setti
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 11 Nov 1999:
> I could just do this:
>
> set
>alternates='^([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$"
BTW, aren't the .'s in the regexp supposed to be escaped, if you want
t
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You bunch them all in one big regex. It looks slightly ugly but
> > fortunately it doesn't need to be human-parseable most of the time.
>
> I imagine it does look really confusing with lots of short things like
> iki.fi in it. :)
Well, if you do like
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 11 Nov 1999:
> Btw, mutt would be a LOT more useful for many people
> if there was an additional flag for your work addresses.
>
> Example: set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Work mails" would then show up with a 'W'
> and would be selectable with "~W".
W
* Nathan Cullen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99 03:45]:
> I am trying to figure out the syntax of the "alternates" option.
> The mutt manual says "A regexp that allows you to
> specify alternate addresses where you receive email".
> My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:51:19AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen thus spoke:
> Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> > My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
> > address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
>
> You bunch them all in
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:55:08PM -0500, Nathan Cullen thus spoke:
> I am trying to figure out the syntax of the "alternates" option. The
> mutt manual says "A regexp that allows you to specify alternate
> addresses where you receive email".
>
> My question is, can I have multiple "alternates"
Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
> address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
You bunch them all in one big regex. It looks slightly ugly but
fortunately it doesn't need to be hu
*sigh* i look for an hour before posting, and in the five seconds after
i send an idiotic mail i find the answer to my question. my apologies
for the spam.
--
zak johnson (ender) | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ _ _| _ _ | http://www.pacifier.com/~zakj/
(- | ) (_| (- | | tel
Can someone plz update the docs with a real example
like that? :)
I was about to go postal here looking for how to do that.
thanks.
- jared
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:21:33AM +0100, Marco Goetze wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 20:00 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 20:00 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how to use this, and have
>no place where there is an example.
> set alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> etc.. and it doesn't work.
set alternates=me@there|[EMAIL
41 matches
Mail list logo
