> myGUIMailViewer /dev/stdin < "$TMPFILE"
The reason for this weirdness (instead of myGUIMailViewer "$TMPFILE") is
that it's a flatpak program that can't access the normal system $TMPDIR,
without taking many detours, so that is kind-of a hack.
> Your diagnostics is wrong, it has nothing to do wit
Jason Stewart via Mutt-users (HE12025-07-31):
> Are there any timeouts related to ? When I pipe to a
> simple program (like `less`), everything works as expected. When I pipe
> to a program with a longer startup time, (like `thunderbird` or
> `chrome`), there is nothing to read from /dev/stdin.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 03:00:15AM +0200, Nickolai Dobrynin wrote:
> I would like to press 'y' (), leave the mutt
> session idle, and still be notified of new mail. Is this possible?
...
> Entering a mailbox (any mailbox) does get me notified, but not until
> I leave the mailbox browser.
AFAIK
>> Sorry for the ping email folks. I just want to check if this list
>> is still functional, or there's an OSUOSL issue.
>
> Thanks everyone for the ping reply messages!
I got the ping message all right. As a side note, I would really appreciate
if someone could answer my question from 2025-06-04
On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 09:09:58AM +0100, Nuno Silva via Mutt-users wrote:
On 2025-07-27, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 01:39:04PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Sorry for the ping email folks. I just want to check if this list
is still functional, or there's an OSUOSL iss
On 2025-07-27, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 01:39:04PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>> Sorry for the ping email folks. I just want to check if this list
>> is still functional, or there's an OSUOSL issue.
>
> Thanks everyone for the ping reply messages!
(Those were not s
On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 01:39:04PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Sorry for the ping email folks. I just want to check if this list is
still functional, or there's an OSUOSL issue.
Thanks everyone for the ping reply messages!
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 53
Hello,
Cameron Simpson (2025/06/02 11:31 +1000):
> On 28May2025 08:49, Sébastien Hinderer
> wrote:
> > Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
> > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > > > In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a >
> > >
On 28May2025 08:49, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a
> message will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc t
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:53:33PM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote:
I suspect there may be a change in behavior with iconv between BigSur and
Sequoia. It would be helpful if I could have an example to work with.
Would you be willing to provide an mbox with the problematic email to me, or
to attach it
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 02:05:52AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> So tell us, how does neomutt handle mailing lists?
I don't think there's a difference in the commands explicitly related
to lists, it's just that there are more ways to search in general.
IIRC. It has been a while.
--
Ian
> Might this be a newly introduced Mac keyboard input problem?
Thank you. I will look into it. I do use Karabiner Elements...
> I suspect there may be a change in behavior with iconv between BigSur and
> Sequoia. It would be helpful if I could have an example to work with.
> Would you be willi
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:09:31AM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote:
This phenomenon did not occur when I was using MacOS BigSur 11.6.7.
The mutt version I am using is 2.2.11 (2023-08-18) for BigSur and
2.2.14 (2025-05-03) for Sequoia. However, today, I recompiled the old
2.2.11 on Sequoia and the same
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/29 00:15 -0400):
> Patterns have
> ~l ("messages addressed to a known mailing list")
> ~u ("messages addressed to a subscribed mailing list")
>
> Apparently those also work by comparing To: and CC: to commands "lists" and
> "subscribe", and to $auto_subscribe. They
On 29/05/25, Kenichi Asai (a...@is.ocha.ac.jp) wrote:
> After I started to use MacOS Sequoia 15.5, Japanese characters encoded
> in iso-2022-jp and quoted-printable are sometimes garbled. It seems
> what is happening is:
...
Might this be a newly introduced Mac keyboard input problem?
https://g
On 2025/05/29 00:35, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote:
This is also an area where neomutt has some extra features, so it may
be worth looking at. I'm biased because I contributed code to neomutt.
So tell us, how does neomutt handle mailing lists?
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:15:07AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> Patterns have
> ~l ("messages addressed to a known mailing list")
> ~u ("messages addressed to a subscribed mailing list")
> Apparently those also work by comparing To: and CC: to commands
> "lists" and "subscribe", and to
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:47:16AM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Separately from all that, I think it would be straightforward and useful to
make the $index_format expandos that identify a message as coming from a
list (%L, %T, %Z), also look at List-ID:.
...
To push this even a bit further
Dear Kurt,
Many thanks for this response, I find it very helpful.
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:42 -0400):
> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 08:47:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > > It sure would be a lot simpler to:
> > > Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists"
> > > Eliminate
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
> > In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a message
> > will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc to
> > that list, even if you are subscribe
Thank you Ian, I find it reassuring that others also have thought about
using scripts and actually even went further than just thinking about
it!
Seb.
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/05/18 10:49 -0700):
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
> > One final
Nuno Silva via Mutt-users (2025/05/18 10:21 +0100):
> On 2025-05-17, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, knowing whether a user is subscribed to a list or
> > not is also very helpful to make sure we do not get responses twice. I
> > do not knowwhether I am wrong or right but I alw
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:12:13AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I think a better approach is to figure out what needs to be changed/
fixed/added to RFC 4155 so that it covers the variants that arisen,
and to create a superseding RFC that updates it. This won't fix all
the problems that have aris
On 22/05/25, Rich Kulawiec (r...@gsp.org) wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 05:26:25PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > Nope, sorry. RFC 4155 has a problem. Its default format, the only one it
> > defines, defines the From_ line rigidly, forbids ">From " escaping, and does
> > not use a length. It
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 05:26:25PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> Nope, sorry. RFC 4155 has a problem. Its default format, the only one it
> defines, defines the From_ line rigidly, forbids ">From " escaping, and does
> not use a length. It says messages should be found by recognizing the whole
>
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:23:20PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:42:08PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > Mutt needs to know what addresses are mailing lists to generate the
> > header Mail-Followup-To:, which asks recipients not to send duplicate
> > messages to you.
>
On 19 May 2025 14:23 -0700, from mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net (Will Yardley):
> As best I understand, M-F-T is a draft from 1997 that expired in
> 1998(?), never made progress towards becoming a standard (and is only
> implemented by a handful of other clients other than Mutt, none of which
> are s
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:42:08PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> Mutt needs to know what addresses are mailing lists to generate the
> header Mail-Followup-To:, which asks recipients not to send duplicate
> messages to you.
As best I understand, M-F-T is a draft from 1997 that expired in
1998(?)
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a message
will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc to
that list, even if you are subscribed to this list.
Yes, I think that's right.
Out of cur
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 08:47:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
It sure would be a lot simpler to:
Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists"
Eliminate $auto_subscribe
Identify messages from lists by List-ID:
Make only send to List-Post:, and fail if it's absent
There
Quoting Rory Campbell-Lange from 15 May (a Thursday in 2025) at 0640 hours...
>
> I didn't know that. I see on the man page mutt can save as mbox, MMDF, MH or
> Maildir using the -m flag. I couldn't see any docs about saving in the
> different mbox formats, which I understand from
> https://docs.a
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:49:02AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> Here is what I do. Like Chris, I use a generator script to start from
> a unified config file (which is JSON5 in my case). There are two
> significant outputs:
Sorry for self-follow-up: I forgot to mention that I
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> One final note: I don't now how other muttusers go about archiving
> their emails but I continue to have dedicated mailboxes (maildirs,
> to be precise) for mailing lists and this, too, requires a quantity
> of configuration tha
On 2025-05-17, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> As I understand it, knowing whether a user is subscribed to a list or
> not is also very helpful to make sure we do not get responses twice. I
> do not knowwhether I am wrong or right but I always foundMutt's way of
> dealing with the situation superior t
On 2025-05-17, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
>> > When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your
>> > work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib direc
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your
> > work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say.
> Yes, I guess that somewhere
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Thanks alot, Chris!
>
> When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your
> work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say. Or maybe if
> the manual has a "Useful links" section there could be a lin
Thanks alot, Chris!
When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your
work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say. Or maybe if
the manual has a "Useful links" section there could be a link to a
public repository or so, so that your contribution receives the
attenti
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 04:39:07PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your feedback!
>
> Chris Green (2025/05/17 14:39 +0100):
> > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > > For instance here is the configuration I have for this list:
>
Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your feedback!
Chris Green (2025/05/17 14:39 +0100):
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > For instance here is the configuration I have for this list:
> >
> > subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org
> > fcc-hook '~t mutt-users@mutt.org|~c m
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> For instance here is the configuration I have for this list:
>
> subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org
> fcc-hook '~t mutt-users@mutt.org|~c mutt-users@mutt.org' '=list/mutt-users/'
> save-hook '~t mutt-users@mutt.org|~c mutt-users@mutt
Dear Kurt, all,
A bunch of thanks for the detective work. I do not have much to add,
especially given I donot see myself doing more than participating to
feature design. To be ven more precise, I do not see myself code
anything, partly because I start to be rather involved in understanding
accessi
Hello Kurt and a lot of gratitude for you re-visiting the topic and
apparently even taking the time to read Mutt's sources!
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/10 17:25 -0400):
> Sébastien, I'm sorry, I gave a bad answer back then, because I misunderstood
> Mutt's mailing list code. I
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:29:13PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Though then it's even more odd that mbox(5) which ships with mutt _does_
(now) mention MBOXCL2, but also still leaves in all the text about From_
escaping / quoting.
Wouldn't it be nice if there was only one version of mbox, and it
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:26:00PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 01:31:27AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > Right, totally understand all of this, but where I'm confused is that if
> > the claim is that M
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:04:35PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
We referred to them as "mboxes" back in the day; the term was so
common that some programs used "mbox" as a default filename. (Can't
recall offhand, but maybe the early BSD version of the "mail" command,
AKA "ucbmail"?)
I think t
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000386.shtml
> mentions MBOXCL and MBOXCL2 dating back to SYSVr4. So, if that's the
> case, that may have been the widely understood "mbox" used well before
> Mutt was first writt
On 16/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > I assume the "Content-Length" (and possibly also "Lines"?) was, as Kurt
> > suggests, a way of efficiently reading emails out of a larger mbox file.
>
> No. It was inv
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I assume the "Content-Length" (and possibly also "Lines"?) was, as
Kurt suggests, a way of efficiently reading emails out of a larger mbox file.
No. It was invented so it wouldn't have to do ">From " escaping, which
damages
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:05:25PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I'm on mutt 2.2.13-1. Is the following what you expected?
---
/tmp/test.maildir/cur/1747420397.M988463P24699Q1.rain.cave:2,S 2025-05-16
19:33:17.0 +0100
+++ /tmp/test.mbox 2025-05-16 20:00:52.063481577 +0100
@@
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:46:07PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
One case in point: the bit about only quoting "From_" lines
if preceded by a blank line. That's one heuristic (if I dare to use the
word) that was pretty randomly followed in the past. It mostly is now,
but has not always been.
T
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:09:16PM -0500, Tim Chase wrote:
And if program Y "properly" escapes them when storing
(indenting again):
>From me with no prefix
>>From me with one prefix
>>>From me with two prefixes
From me with three prefixes
program X will only un-mung the first one (corr
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:46:07PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> One case in point: the bit about only quoting "From_" lines
> if preceded by a blank line.
Oh this is kind of interesting. I have a set of patches that I
apply to mutt, like for when new versions come out. One of them is
a fix to
On 16/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> All right, I just made a maildir for this test. Tar file is attached. Save
> the tar file, extract the maildir from it (it's named test.maildir), do
>
> mutt -f test.maildir
>
> have Mutt save the message to a new mbox file, cat that mbox
On 2025-05-16 08:37, Mutt list wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not
> > use mbox, and store mail in other ways instead.
>
> I've yet to see an
On 2025-05-16 14:46, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> PS: just to babble on, here's part of the body of a message that I use
> in one of the test scripts for my mail delivery agent.
> [snip]
> I've left-padded all the lines here with spaces so they won't get
> quoted. I hope.
If you're looking for more tr
On 16/05/25, Mark E. Mallett (m...@schmem.com) wrote:
> Just to wade into the bikeshedding..
...
> PS: just to babble on, here's part of the body of a message that I use
> in one of the test scripts for my mail delivery agent. The test files
> are used in testing different formats (mbox and maildir
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
I've yet to see anything to fix, having used mbox format exclusively
since the 1980s, with mutt since the late 90s. It just effortlessly
works with complete reliability - never a hiccup.
If you use only Mutt, only with m
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not use
> > mbox, and store mail in oth
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:26:00PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 01:31:27AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
Mboxcl2 does it the other way. Instead of using a marker, it uses a length,
stored in the non-standard header Content-Length:. Software reads the
message header section
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:47:15AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to
> > > fix it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is
> > > to not use mbox, and store mail in other ways instead.
> > I've yet to see anything to fi
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not use
> > mbox, and store mail in oth
On 16/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> > I was just confused because the earlier post had seemed
> > to imply that this was not done / needed for MBOXCL2.
>
> It's not, because that variant has Content-Length:.
>
> Let's say you want to put multiple variable-length chunks of text
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 01:31:27AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> Mboxcl2 does it the other way. Instead of using a marker, it uses a length,
> stored in the non-standard header Content-Length:. Software reads the
> message header section and in there finds the length of the message body,
> and th
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:18:53PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
> the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
No, you're confusing two different uses of '>' at the beginning of a line.
...
Yes, I understand how quote mark
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 08:57:56PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
> > the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
>
> No, you're confusing two different uses
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
No, you're confusing two different uses of '>' at the beginning of a line.
A reply can quote the original message, an
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:40:34AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I didn't know that. I see on the man page mutt can save as mbox, MMDF, MH or
Maildir using the -m flag. I couldn't see any docs about saving in the
different mbox formats, which I understand from
https://docs.aspose.com/email/n
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:40:34AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 14/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > > I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd
> > > be grateful to kno
On 15/05/25, Christian Brabandt (cbli...@256bit.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > I tested
> >
> > mutt -R -f test.mbox -m Maildir
> >
> > I tagged all and saved to a new destination, and that worked as you
> > suggested.
> A long time ago¹, I wrote a guide (
On Thu, 15 May 2025, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> My plan for "mailboxoperator"
> (https://github.com/rorycl/mailboxoperator) is to provide a general
> mailbox/maildir parser which might be useful for e.g. legal discovery.
> My post here was because of the problem with the protonmail go mbox
> pa
On 15/05/25, Dan Ritter (d...@randomstring.org) wrote:
> Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > I'm going to start with the postmark line (I can't really read C but
> > is_from in from.c makes interesting reading.) I'll then work to decode
> > the different mbox types, starting with MBOXCL/MBOXCL2, as nee
On 14/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd
> > be grateful to know if that is corrrect.
>
> I think that's right, with a small addition: si
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd
be grateful to know if that is corrrect.
I think that's right, with a small addition: since version 1.9.5 (April 2018),
Mutt has also written Lines: along
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 05:27:51PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
[snip]
>
> It sure would be a lot simpler to:
> Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists"
> Eliminate $auto_subscribe
> Identify messages from lists by List-ID:
> Make only send to List-Post:, and fail i
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 01:50:35PM +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
I follow a discourse forum but with emails enabled as I am not
comfortable with its web interface.
For the moment, the emails I receive for forum posts appear as addressed
to me (with a + flag) rather than coming from a mailing
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/04/16 21:11 -0700):
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:35:32AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
> wrote:
>
> > Can I make this a feature request?
>
> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/499
Awesome, thanks!
Seb.
On 18/04/2025 12:50, Erwan David wrote:
I use mutt with sevreal accounts on different servers through
folder-hook, account-hook, etc.
But now I need to use it with two different accounts on same server.
I do not succeed in differentiating them since folders are names imap://server,
and
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 01:44:22PM CEST, Paul Tansom said:
> On 18/04/2025 12:50, Erwan David wrote:
> > I use mutt with sevreal accounts on different servers through
> > folder-hook, account-hook, etc.
> > But now I need to use it with two different accounts on same server.
> > I do not succ
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:26:48AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> So they have to be on different machines in the case of using X remotely:
> .Xresources on the server, .Xdefaults on the client.
Eh... I didn't really want to dive too deep into the X init process,
since it's esot
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:01:13AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> Like most of the programs that came with the original X Window
> System, xterm relies on "X resources" for configuration. On most
> modern Linux systems, you can create a file in your home directory
> called .Xresources, and then def
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 03:05:15PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I like to have my email window to have a light theme and
> everything else to have a dark theme (to distinguish things easily
> and sort of intuitively).
...
> I tried using `xterm -bg "#ff" -fg '#000
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 01:58:24PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
Fastmail is a large mail service with a good reputation. It's not
expensive -- looks like base price is $5 / month.
Another happy Fastmail customer here. Very good IMAP support, responsive
staff, plus you can download your contac
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:18:42PM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
Regrettably, the web-based MUA provided by my ISP, after ceasing to
accept smtp from users, is rather deficient, not least in that regard.
(It's a PITA to use too.)
In another thread, Ken Moffat wrote:
I turned out t
On 18.04.25 12:28, Nuno Silva via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 2025-04-17, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
>
> > On 16.04.25 15:05, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> [...]
>
> The message I'm replying to shows without References/In-Reply-To
> here. Does it lack proper threading on the mailing
* Nuno Silva via Mutt-users on Friday, April 18, 2025 at 12:28:12 +0100:
On 2025-04-17, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
On 16.04.25 15:05, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
[...]
The message I'm replying to shows without References/In-Reply-To
here. Does it lack proper threading on the mail
On 2025-04-17, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 16.04.25 15:05, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
[...]
The message I'm replying to shows without References/In-Reply-To
here. Does it lack proper threading on the mailing list side too, or is
there something amiss on Gmane's side?
--
Nuno S
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:13:15PM -0700, Akshay Hegde via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
>
> I just send an empty body when I ubscribe/subscribe. And yes, to answer
> your initial question, I use mutt to send the (un)subscribe email.
>
> You shoul
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/04/17 21:42 -0400):
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 04:41:54PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> > I checked and it is needed. If you read a list message and
> > then move back to another folder and want to reply to a
> > message without first opening it, you need the folder-hook
>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 04:41:54PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I checked and it is needed. If you read a list message and
then move back to another folder and want to reply to a
message without first opening it, you need the folder-hook
to reset the default bindings. Otherwise you press 'r' a
Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>>I had `folder-hook '=lists/'` too, but `message-hook` has
>>replaced that for me. I may not need `folder-hook .`
>>anymore, but I haven't changed or tested it in several
>>years.
>
> I think you don't need it. Looks like you used "folder-hook ." to
> reset to the default
Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> Yes, my problem is that when I respond, I do not remember
> to check at the top especially for the longer mesages when
> it goes off the screen.
>
> I will look into message hooks to set this (as suggested
> by Kurt): I was thinking that someone may have done
Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Wed Apr16'25 04:54:08PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Testing with pull request #13 does look decent. So it seems
>> like the issue may be largely that the theme choice uses a
>> bit of a dark background by default, but you can adjust it
>> to suite your tastes
On 16.04.25 15:05, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> I tried using `xterm -bg "#ff" -fg '#00' -e mutt`` and that does help
> some, however, I am not sure if there is a better preferred way.
Better? Dunno, but for nigh on 40 years now, I've had eye-friendly
light-on-dark in mutt, vim
On Wed Apr16'25 09:21:28PM, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote:
> From: googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 21:21:28 -0700
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: using a light theme with xterm (that has black background)
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:35:32AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> Can I make this a feature request?
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/499
--
Ian
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:07:47PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
> Yes, it does work, thanks! However, I have to remember that this is
> a list and use that then. I am bound to forget this (as I was about
> to do right now) and therefore it would be better if I had one "r"
> set which
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 07:16:53PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:04:19PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
>
> > PS: Off-topic to this thread, but I have realized that the mutt mailing
> > list does not have Reply-To set to the mailing list.
>
> That's been a
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:07:47PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote:
Have you tried ? Does it do what you want? (You don't
have to send the reply, just see what Mutt generates in To: and CC:,
and then abort the reply.)
Yes, it does work, thanks! However, I have to remember that this
On Wed Apr16'25 07:59:34PM, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> From: Kurt Hackenberg
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:59:34 -0400
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: using a light theme with xterm (that has black background)
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:38:25PM -0500, Ranjan Mait
1 - 100 of 26749 matches
Mail list logo
