Others in this thread have already addressed your question, but I wanted to
mention that redundant keys can often be re-mapped to macros and other mutt
commands. There are many keys that do nothing in mutt, and/or you might not
need for your specific configuration. These can then be remapped into m
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 04:38:33PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
The G key gets pop email.
What key is used to download imap email?
No key, by default. There's the function , but, by
default, there's no key binding to it.
I change that, bind G to , since I use IMAP but not
POP. Here's an e
The G key gets pop email.
What key is used to download imap email?
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Schoppitsch Dieter told:
[...]
> * What can I try else? - Who causes this error (mutt, MTA, myISP)?
>
> I'm using mutt 0.91.2, ssmtp 2.27 resp. smail 3.2.0. (I couldn't /
> don't want to upgrade my system - Debian 2.0).
Switch to woody, set up mutt an
* Schoppitsch Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-2002 15:36]:
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi all - I'm desperated - sorry for bothering you.
I can't get mutt (or my MTA ?) to run. Since 2 weeks I try to find help in
documents (ie Sven Guckes Setup Hints) and asked in two mailing lists.
I tried to run mutt with ssmtp or smail. Mutt tells me "Mail sent." but
then I get (with both MTAs)
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:53:24AM -0700, Paul Seniuk wrote:
> I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment
> with following Mutt command:
>
> mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> < /test/test.html
>
> The message is sent, however the page attachment is within
> the messaage body
I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment
with following Mutt command:
mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED]
< /test/test.html
The message is sent, however the page attachment is within
the messaage body and only appearing as plain text. I
~~think~ this is because the message is
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, John Arundel wrote:
> For a moment I had a horrible vision of a company which dictated top-posting
> as a corporate email policy...
May as well be around here.
> RUN!!!
Just as soon as the job market allows ;-)
--
You lose it if you talk about it. -Ernest Hemingway
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001, John Arundel wrote:
> On 2001-07-17 at 11:06:14, Chris Fuchs warbled:
> > As a professional courtesy to some of the people I work and
> > deal with.
>
> Ah - yes, I realise that you will receive top-posted mail, and that you
> don't have time to educate everyone you deal wit
On 2001-07-17 at 11:06:14, Chris Fuchs warbled:
> As a professional courtesy to some of the people I work and
> deal with.
Ah - yes, I realise that you will receive top-posted mail, and that you
don't have time to educate everyone you deal with, but why are you yourself
forced to originate this r
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, John Arundel wrote:
> On 2001-07-17 at 09:28:55, Chris Fuchs warbled:
> > Yes, I quite agree - unfortunately I have to deal and comply
> > with this format
>
> Why?
As a professional courtesy to some of the people I work and
deal with.
Chris
--
Be who you are and say what
On 2001-07-17 at 09:28:55, Chris Fuchs warbled:
> Yes, I quite agree - unfortunately I have to deal and comply
> with this format
Why?
--
"I had to stop driving my car for a while. The tires got dizzy."
- Steven Wright
__
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Yeah,... only the first line of output from the
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001, Chris Fuchs wrote:
> on Wed,11 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> > Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> > > if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> > > email, rather t
on Wed,11 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> > if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> > email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons origi
On (11/07/01 10:30), Ken Weingold wrote: This brings up a question of
> mine, since we are on the topic. This comes up more in USENET than
> email, though. You have a thread going on for a while, and want to
> quote it, but it is MANY lines. That is where I wonder what to do,
> since you could
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Exactly - and that's (one of) the reasons, why TOFU (german, meaning: text
> above, full quote below) is *BAD*. It wastes bandwith and makes it harder to
> follow to what *EXACTLY* you're relying. It's simply neither necessary nor
> wanted nor is
Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
> email when replying.
>
> I have my si
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:16:25PM +1000, Anthony Green wrote:
>
> Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
> *above* the email text that you have been sent and quote it in some
> form .. the >'s etc.
>
> So ... if the signature was appended at the top of the email
Anthony Green [mutt-users] <11/07/01 21:05 +1000>:
> Hello all ..
> I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
> email when
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:16:25PM +1000, Anthony Green wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Take for example my reply to your email now . I type at the
> top and reply to your email ... but my signature is *below* you email.
>
> Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
> *above* t
Hi,
Take for example my reply to your email now . I type at the
top and reply to your email ... but my signature is *below* you email.
Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
*above* the email text that you have been sent and quote it in some
form .. the >'s et
Hello all ..
I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
email when replying.
I have my signature set in my .muttrc as :
set sig
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:47:25PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:06:22AM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
>
> According to the note, it would be OK to do something like:
>
> set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 et' -c ':0;/^$'
>
You can also put things like
autocmd Bu
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:40:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I would like to ask a question since the search command has a
> > side-effect in the editor. Since the "-c ':$;?^$'" is a search command
> > for a blank line, it leav
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated-Sender: #[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authenticated-IP: [134.60.50.4]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Horace G. Friend III" <[
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:35:42PM -0500, Wade A. Mosely wrote:
> Timothy Legant wrote:
> > You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> > you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> > want to consider the following instead:
> >
> > set edi
Timothy Legant wrote:
> You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> want to consider the following instead:
>
> set editor="vim -c ':0;/^$'"
>
> which will search for and move to the first blank
On 2001.03.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Timothy Legant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> want to consider the following instead:
>
> set editor="
> You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> want to consider the following instead:
>
> set editor="vim -c ':0;/^$'"
>
> which will search for and move to the first blank line. In an email
> m
And btw, mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address bounces.
G'luck,
Peter
--
I am the thought you are now thinking.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:47:25PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:06:22AM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
> > I'd like to use this setting, too, but right now
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:06:22AM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I'd like to use this setting, too, but right now I have:
>
> set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 et'"
>
> Can I incorporate this into it??
>
> set editor="vim -c ':0;/^$'"
>From the vim manpage:
-c {command}
I'd like to use this setting, too, but right now I have:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 et'"
Can I incorporate this into it??
set editor="vim -c ':0;/^$'"
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:31:29AM -0600, Timothy Legant muttered:
| On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
| > On
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:12AM +, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> I have an autocommand for temporary mutt files. I want to move the
> cursor down 6 positions automatically when I start a new mail (this
> would move the cursor right under the headers (i use edit headers).
> But i can't seem to fig
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:31:29AM -0600, Timothy Legant wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:12AM +, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have an autocommand for temporary mutt files. I want to move the
> > > c
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:12AM +, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have an autocommand for temporary mutt files. I want to move the
> > cursor down 6 positions automatically when I start a new mail (this
> > would
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:12AM +, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have an autocommand for temporary mutt files. I want to move the
> cursor down 6 positions automatically when I start a new mail (this
> would move the cursor right under the headers (i use edit headers). > But i can'
Hi All,
I have an autocommand for temporary mutt files. I want to move the
cursor down 6 positions automatically when I start a new mail (this
would move the cursor right under the headers (i use edit headers).
But i can't seem to figure out how to do this from a vimrc file...
Any help?
TIA --
Maybe someone can help this guy?
- Forwarded message from David Brewster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Brewster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:10:18 +0000
Subject: Mutt question, sorry.
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us
Hi
Sorry to email yo
Hi Jeremy,
interesting question. I'd be interested in a solution to that, too.
Would you please summarize any private mails (if you get any) here?
Thanks,
Andy.
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://andy.spiegl.de
PGP/GPG: see headers
o _ _
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-+-+--
the crises posed a question / just beneath the skin
the virtue in my veins replied / that quitters never win
Hi
I have the folowing options s
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>> You would probably be better off with some tool that is meant for
>> composing and sending MIME-messages from the command line, for example
>> I have a program called metasend on my Debian system.
>
> I have this phantastic tool on my system which i
> You would probably be better off with some tool that is meant for
> composing and sending MIME-messages from the command line, for example
> I have a program called metasend on my Debian system.
I have this phantastic tool on my system which is called "mutt". :-)
If it's acceptable to send t
Pedro Sotelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 09 Jun 2000:
> I am ding the follow:
>
> mutt -s "Testemail" -i "message.html" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with this the content type is text/plain and I can se the HTML tags
> in the body of the message but I can't se the HTML page...
If you really want
Hi..!!!
I want to do a script to send some messages.. but the message is
an HTML page... how can I set the Content-Type: to text/html ???
or how can I send an html page???
I am ding the follow:
mutt -s "Testemail" -i "message.html" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Zimmerman wrote:
> How can I send a message with an attachment from the command line? I
> see that mutt has a -a option that will allow for the attachment, but I
> need this to work without user interaction (as this will go into a cron
> job).
mutt -a /path/filename -s "subject" user@host
Chris Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can I send a message with an attachment from the command line?
echo "Here is the enclosing text" | \
mutt -s "Here is your subject" -a attach_filename [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes
How can I send a message with an attachment from the command line? I
see that mutt has a -a option that will allow for the attachment, but I
need this to work without user interaction (as this will go into a cron
job).
Thanks,
Chris Zimmerman
49 matches
Mail list logo
