Hi,
I'm using Mutt with Gmail and OAuth2 with a Google Cloud project and the
mutt_oauth2.py script and everything works fine (obviously). The only
annoying thing is that the refresh token expires every seven days, so every
seven days I have to manually re-run mutt_oauth2.py with --authoriz
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:12:13AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I think a better approach is to figure out what needs to be changed/
fixed/added to RFC 4155 so that it covers the variants that arisen,
and to create a superseding RFC that updates it. This won't fix all
the problems that have aris
On 22/05/25, Rich Kulawiec (r...@gsp.org) wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 05:26:25PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > Nope, sorry. RFC 4155 has a problem. Its default format, the only one it
> > defines, defines the From_ line rigidly, forbids ">From " escaping, and does
> > not use a length. It
ves the future well. There are, and will be, projects
that will rely on the documentation (which at the point, for better or worse,
is RFC 4155, an archived web page mentioned elsewhere in this thread [1], and
some scattered notes) long after mutt is gone. (Why? Because there
are enormous reposi
Quoting Rory Campbell-Lange from 15 May (a Thursday in 2025) at 0640 hours...
>
> I didn't know that. I see on the man page mutt can save as mbox, MMDF, MH or
> Maildir using the -m flag. I couldn't see any docs about saving in the
> different mbox formats, which I u
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:29:13PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Though then it's even more odd that mbox(5) which ships with mutt _does_
(now) mention MBOXCL2, but also still leaves in all the text about From_
escaping / quoting.
Wouldn't it be nice if there was only one version of mb
gt; > the claim is that Mutt uses Mboxcl2 (as I think the man page for mbox(5)
> > implies, and also as it adds the Content-Length header) it shouldn't
> > _need_ to escape the "From " lines in message bodies, but it does anyway.
>
> No, it doesn't, by my
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:04:35PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
We referred to them as "mboxes" back in the day; the term was so
common that some programs used "mbox" as a default filename. (Can't
recall offhand, but maybe the early BSD version of the "mail" command,
AKA "ucbmail"?)
I think t
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000386.shtml
> mentions MBOXCL and MBOXCL2 dating back to SYSVr4. So, if that's the
> case, that may have been the widely understood "mbox" used well
On 16/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > I assume the "Content-Length" (and possibly also "Lines"?) was, as Kurt
> > suggests, a way of efficiently reading emails out of a larger mbox file.
>
> No. It was inv
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I assume the "Content-Length" (and possibly also "Lines"?) was, as
Kurt suggests, a way of efficiently reading emails out of a larger mbox file.
No. It was invented so it wouldn't have to do ">From " escaping, which
damages
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:05:25PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I'm on mutt 2.2.13-1. Is the following what you expected?
---
/tmp/test.maildir/cur/1747420397.M988463P24699Q1.rain.cave:2,S 2025-05-16
19:33:17.0 +0100
+++ /tmp/test.mbox 2025-05-16 20:00:52.063481577
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:46:07PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
One case in point: the bit about only quoting "From_" lines
if preceded by a blank line. That's one heuristic (if I dare to use the
word) that was pretty randomly followed in the past. It mostly is now,
but has not always been.
T
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:09:16PM -0500, Tim Chase wrote:
And if program Y "properly" escapes them when storing
(indenting again):
>From me with no prefix
>>From me with one prefix
>>>From me with two prefixes
From me with three prefixes
program X will only un-mung the first one (corr
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:46:07PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> One case in point: the bit about only quoting "From_" lines
> if preceded by a blank line.
Oh this is kind of interesting. I have a set of patches that I
apply to mutt, like for when new versions come out. One of
On 16/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> All right, I just made a maildir for this test. Tar file is attached. Save
> the tar file, extract the maildir from it (it's named test.maildir), do
>
> mutt -f test.maildir
>
> have Mutt save the message to a
On 2025-05-16 08:37, Mutt list wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not
> > use mbox, and store mail in other wa
On 2025-05-16 14:46, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> PS: just to babble on, here's part of the body of a message that I use
> in one of the test scripts for my mail delivery agent.
> [snip]
> I've left-padded all the lines here with spaces so they won't get
> quoted. I hope.
If you're looking for more tr
On 16/05/25, Mark E. Mallett (m...@schmem.com) wrote:
> Just to wade into the bikeshedding..
...
> PS: just to babble on, here's part of the body of a message that I use
> in one of the test scripts for my mail delivery agent. The test files
> are used in testing different formats (mbox and maildir
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
I've yet to see anything to fix, having used mbox format exclusively
since the 1980s, with mutt since the late 90s. It just effortlessly
works with complete reliability - never a hiccup.
If you use only Mutt, only
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not use
make them start with ">From " instead.
Right, totally understand all of this, but where I'm confused is that if
the claim is that Mutt uses Mboxcl2 (as I think the man page for mbox(5)
implies, and also as it adds the Content-Length header) it shouldn't
_need_ to escape the &
ead.
> > I've yet to see anything to fix, having used mbox format
> > exclusively since the 1980s, with mutt since the late 90s. It just
> > effortlessly works with complete reliability - never a hiccup.
> I agree - there are some quirks (like the "From " lin
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:37:01AM +, dvalin--- via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 16.05.25 01:31, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>
> > If you think this is a mess, you're right. People have tried to fix
> > it, but it can't really be fixed. The only good solution is to not use
ple variable-length chunks of text in a
> single file. When you want to read one of those chunks, how do you find the
> end? It can only work if whatever wrote the file supplied extra information.
> It can either put a marker after each chunk of text, or put the length of
> each chunk
having used mbox format exclusively
since the 1980s, with mutt since the late 90s. It just effortlessly
works with complete reliability - never a hiccup.
My mail directory currently contains 1352 mboxes, a few with upwards of
25,000 mails. The prospect of a few million mail files rather repels
me
" instead.
Right, totally understand all of this, but where I'm confused is that if
the claim is that Mutt uses Mboxcl2 (as I think the man page for mbox(5)
implies, and also as it adds the Content-Length header) it shouldn't
_need_ to escape the "From " lines in mess
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:18:53PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
> the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
No, you're confusing two different uses of '>' at the beginning of a line
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 08:57:56PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
> > the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
>
> No
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:25:44PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
It's interesting that in replies, Mutt uses >From escaping, though in
the actual raw mbox file, it's not present.
No, you're confusing two different uses of '>' at the beginning of a line.
A reply
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:40:34AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I didn't know that. I see on the man page mutt can save as mbox, MMDF, MH or
Maildir using the -m flag. I couldn't see any docs about saving in the
different mbox formats, which I understand from
https://docs.aspose
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:40:34AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 14/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > > I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'
On 15/05/25, Christian Brabandt (cbli...@256bit.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > I tested
> >
> > mutt -R -f test.mbox -m Maildir
> >
> > I tagged all and saved to a new destination, and that worked as you
> > suggeste
the protonmail go mbox
> parser which doesn't cope with mboxcl format.
>
> However your idea is generally useful to me, so thank you!
>
> I tested
>
> mutt -R -f test.mbox -m Maildir
>
> I tagged all and saved to a new destination, and that worked as you sugges
es, starting with MBOXCL/MBOXCL2, as needed. I'm
> > not going to attempt to take on MMDF and MH format, but I've already got
> > a basic Maildir format parser going, which is thankfully pretty easy.
>
> Given that, why not use mutt to translate all the mboxes as Mai
On 14/05/25, Kurt Hackenberg (k...@panix.com) wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd
> > be grateful to know if that is corrrect.
>
> I think that&#
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd
be grateful to know if that is corrrect.
I think that's right, with a small addition: since version 1.9.5 (April 2018),
Mutt has also wri
Hello; I'm a new subscriber here, but very long-time mutt user.
I believe that mutt uses mboxcl2 format for writing new mailboxes. I'd be
grateful to know if that is corrrect. It would be helpful also to know how long
that has been the case since I've got some 20 year old mutt
On 18/04/2025 12:50, Erwan David wrote:
I use mutt with sevreal accounts on different servers through
folder-hook, account-hook, etc.
But now I need to use it with two different accounts on same server.
I do not succeed in differentiating them since folders are names imap://server,
and
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 01:44:22PM CEST, Paul Tansom said:
> On 18/04/2025 12:50, Erwan David wrote:
> > I use mutt with sevreal accounts on different servers through
> > folder-hook, account-hook, etc.
> > But now I need to use it with two different accounts on same
I use mutt with sevreal accounts on different servers through
folder-hook, account-hook, etc.
But now I need to use it with two different accounts on same server.
I do not succeed in differentiating them since folders are names imap://server,
and I cannot use
imap://user1@server and
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:13:15PM -0700, Akshay Hegde via Mutt-users wrote:
> On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
>
> I just send an empty body when I ubscribe/subscribe. And yes, to answer
> your initial question, I use mutt to send the (un)subscribe ema
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 03:25:51AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Correction on that last post.
> When /etc/openssl/cert.pem doesn't yet exist. If that case isn't
> covered then sasl authentication failures result when contacting
> gmail.
Wouldn't a *lot* of other stuff fail too? Like, curl or w
Correction on that last post.
When /etc/openssl/cert.pem doesn't yet exist. If that case isn't covered then
sasl authentication failures result when contacting gmail.
It would likely help developers to listen to web content before it goes public
with a screen readder to discover and correct spelling mistakes. Very popular
gmail mutt tutorials fail to cover the case when /etc/openssl/openssl.pem does
not yet exist on a machine and when that happens it causes
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:51:24PM -0500, J wrote:
Worth mentioning is that mutt has a list menu, bound by default to Esc + 'L'.
This can be a handy way to unsubscribe to lists, even some marketing emails.
Damn, one never stops learning. Thanks for this tip, it's super-useful.
Worth mentioning is that mutt has a list menu, bound by default to Esc + 'L'.
This can be a handy way to unsubscribe to lists, even some marketing emails.
Quoting Akshay Hegde via Mutt-users from Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 06:13:15PM CDT:
> On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mut
On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:19:36AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > >> Per <https://subspac
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:19:36AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >> Per <https://subspace.kernel.org/vger.kernel.org.html>, the
> >> unsub address is: linux-k
Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Per <https://subspace.kernel.org/vger.kernel.org.html>, the
>> unsub address is: linux-kernel+unsubscr...@vger.kernel.org.
[...]
> Thanks!
Glad it helped.
> I followe
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> >> Not really a mutt-specific issue, but I think I've spotted your error.
> >> The form
Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote:
>> Not really a mutt-specific issue, but I think I've spotted your error.
>> The format for commands is listname+comm...@lists.linux.dev. You seem to
>> have them backw
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:36:14AM +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> > > Has anyone managed to sub or unsub from mutt ?
If you can arrange for those mails to bounce consistently, you'll be
unsubscribed automatically after a while ;-)
I try to be a good netizen and use
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
[...]
> >
> > The following failed:
> >
> > unsubscribe+linux-ker...@lists.linux.dev
> > host smtp.subspace.kernel
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote:
> Now that all the vger.kernel.org lists have moved to subspace, the
> old Majordomo unsub process is rejected. I used to read the kernel
> list, and test late rc kernels, then more recently I just skimmed
> th
:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
Has anyone managed to sub or unsub from mutt ?
ĸen
--
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
> I desperately want politics to be kept out of Mutt!
And yet, you're the first one in the thread to clearly show colours and
therefore actually make it political to begin with.
*scnr*
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 08:23:05AM +0200, Roland Hess wrote:
> “riseup” a portal with a good reputa
My apologies. Didn't mean to offend anyone personally.
Roland
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Roland Hess wrote:
> I would like to see mail from "riseup" n,e,t
> not simply forwarded via the Mutt list. It's not clear who is behind
> this and the organizat
I desperately want politics to be kept out of Mutt!
Off topic.
It was just a one-off mail, mutt mailing list is not drowning in
spam
—F
“riseup” a portal with a good reputation?
Who says it is? The society of Bandera friends? George Soros? Mrs. von
der Leyen?
There's someone who claims he can't find a pen pal website. Is that
conceivable?
I desperately want politics to be kept out of Mutt!
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at
Hello,
Is it possible to read/write mail with an account at Gmail using IMAPS
and SMTP(S) with mutt? Any working configuration example?
Thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045
Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub
This post was not a bug report. As it says, the problem no longer
appears to be happening (though it's hard to prove a "never").
As I said in the report two years ago, which I provided a link to in my
post yesterday, I looked into it fairly extensively, including running
truss and
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Roland Hess wrote:
> I would like to see mail from "riseup" n,e,t not simply forwarded
> via the Mutt list. It's not clear who is behind this and the
> organizations associated with them. No imprint! The content
> (contacting)
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:06:47PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Is it possible to read/write mail with an account at Gmail using IMAPS
> and SMTP(S) with mutt? Any working configuration example?
Other two responses should have you covered. Also should be some good
examples if y
I would like to see mail from "riseup" n,e,t
not simply forwarded via the Mutt list. It's not clear who is behind
this and the organizations associated with them. No imprint!
The content (contacting) obviously has nothing to do with Mutt. A filter
should have sorted this out automatically.
Matthias Apitz writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to read/write mail with an account at Gmail using IMAPS
> and SMTP(S) with mutt? Any working configuration example?
>
> Thanks
>
Hellow matthias,
Maybe you need Gmail's app passwords?
Useful link is <https://s
El día viernes, marzo 21, 2025 a las 11:43:15a. m. +, Nacho via Mutt-users
escribió:
> > I run for years mutt in FreeBSD, actual 2.2.12 in FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT
> > and in the terminal urxvt, all compiled from ports. I tested now:
> >
> > - start mutt, stay in inde
Egg on my face again.
I had looked at the OSUOSL list on the archive page and saw no search
functionality hence the question when I went back and tried the MARC
list search is available and again I look foolish.
Sorry for the noise.
Be well,
Mike
--
The party in power is always the worst, and every
Is there a way to search all of mutt-users list messages?
Thanks,
Mike
--
The party in power is always the worst, and every man looks good until
he is elected.
- Will Rogers
> I run for years mutt in FreeBSD, actual 2.2.12 in FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT
> and in the terminal urxvt, all compiled from ports. I tested now:
>
> - start mutt, stay in index view
> - resized the urxvt
> - no lock
Me too, have been using mutt in urxvt with FreeBSD for almost
El día jueves, marzo 20, 2025 a las 04:28:07 -0400, Mark E. Mallett escribió:
> Hi,
>
> A couple of years ago I reported, here:
>
>
> https://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/Week-of-Mon-20230501/004201.html
>
> having issues with mutt built with slang on
Hi,
A couple of years ago I reported, here:
https://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/Week-of-Mon-20230501/004201.html
having issues with mutt built with slang on FreeBSD locking up after
resizing terminal windows. This problem persisted through multiple
versions both of mutt and FreeBSD
Others in this thread have already addressed your question, but I wanted to
mention that redundant keys can often be re-mapped to macros and other mutt
commands. There are many keys that do nothing in mutt, and/or you might not
need for your specific configuration. These can then be remapped into
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 04:38:33PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
The G key gets pop email.
What key is used to download imap email?
No key, by default. There's the function , but, by
default, there's no key binding to it.
I change that, bind G to , since I use IMAP but not
POP. Here's an e
The G key gets pop email.
What key is used to download imap email?
gt; tarball.
as an old-timer and by now a mere lurker, mutt just works for me on
Slackware64-15.0 - keep up the good work!
Hello Mutt Users,
I've just released version 2.2.14. Instructions for downloading are
available at <http://www.mutt.org/download.html>, or the tarball can be
directly downloaded from <http://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/>. Please take
the time to verify the signature file agains
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:05:51PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I‘m running mutt for many, many years on all my FreeBSD laptops and Linux
> cellphones.
>
> Is there any way to run it on an iPhone, maybe in a container?
I'm sure someone's done it... tbh, even as a long t
s root. I would really like to be wrong on that last statement
> though.
>
>
> - Jude Q: What borders absolute stupidity?
> A: Canada and Mexico. -
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> >
> > I‘m running mutt for many, many years on all
So far as I now know, ish doesn't come with a package to add users so you
run ish as root. I would really like to be wrong on that last statement
though.
- Jude Q: What borders absolute stupidity?
A: Canada and Mexico. -
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> I‘m r
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:05:51PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I‘m running mutt for many, many years on all my FreeBSD laptops and Linux
> cellphones.
>
> Is there any way to run it on an iPhone, maybe in a container?
There are apps that provide a Linux shell under iOS. iSH
(<
I‘m running mutt for many, many years on all my FreeBSD laptops and
Linux cellphones.
Is there any way to run it on an iPhone, maybe in a container?
Thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/
phone: +49-170-4527211
t.
I have six accounts defined in .muttrc, with six sets of credentials in
six files in .mutt so I tested them all both in sequence and out of
sequence. Sometimes Mutt switches accounts perfectly, sometimes it
fails, and I haven't yet identified the exact circumstances of the
failure (but at
fig file for this account in .mutt says (along with the
correct credentials):
# activate TLS if available on the server
set ssl_starttls=yes
# always use SSL when connecting to a server
set ssl_force_tls=yes
and that seems to be obeyed. But PLAIN authentication should work: this
is what the ac
On 16/07/2024 10:08, MikZyth via Mutt-users wrote:
On 16-07-2024 00:15, Peter Flynn wrote:
BTW does Mutt generate *any* logs at all by default (I don't mean
debug logs).
$ mutt -v | grep DEBUG
will show you whether your build has debug enabled.
Apparently yes it has DEBUG on, which is
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:51:19PM GMT, Peter Flynn wrote:
> I installed mutt 1.13.2 from the system repos on Mint 20.3 in order
> to be able to force some wayward messages into the threads where
> they belong.
> That works fine on this address, so I have been trying to add more
>
On 16-07-2024 00:15, Peter Flynn wrote:
> On 16/07/2024 00:03, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:51:19PM +0100, Peter Flynn wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it possible to turn logging on without having to compile my own mutt
> > > from
> > >
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:15:12AM +0100, Peter Flynn wrote:
> On 16/07/2024 00:03, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:51:19PM +0100, Peter Flynn wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it possible to turn logging on without having to compile my own mutt
> > >
On 16/07/2024 00:03, Will Yardley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:51:19PM +0100, Peter Flynn wrote:
Is it possible to turn logging on without having to compile my own mutt from
source? Or should I look for logs elsewhere?
Somewhat depends whether your build has debug enabled, but first
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:51:19PM +0100, Peter Flynn wrote:
>
> Is it possible to turn logging on without having to compile my own mutt from
> source? Or should I look for logs elsewhere?
Somewhat depends whether your build has debug enabled, but first thing
to try would probably be to
I installed mutt 1.13.2 from the system repos on Mint 20.3 in order to
be able to force some wayward messages into the threads where they belong.
That works fine on this address, so I have been trying to add more of my
accounts on various other servers, but some of them clearly try to
connect
Hi All,
Is there a way, in a save-hook, to match an email header with an
exact string match (not a regex) when the mail being saved is from
an IMAP mailbox? I am saving the messages to local mbox files, and
am using both the Mutt header cache and the Mutt message cache. I
would like for the
Okta SSO will also work, since it will just be inline with whatever
> web-based signin process you need.
In the past, I did use that python script for mutt with oauth, but
that was years ago at a job where oauth was used for internal single
sign-on generally. Haven't tried integrating that
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:41:27PM -0400, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> Is it possible to use mutt with gmail's IMAP for a Google account that
> uses Okta single sign-on?
Creating an app password, if you're allowed to by organization policy,
is going to be by far the simplest option, I t
Is it possible to use mutt with gmail's IMAP for a Google account that uses
Okta single sign-on?
-- Cos
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 08:08:22AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
[snip discussion about OAuth support]
> All that said, while I know active development is pretty much on pause,
> and while it's unclear to me whether XOAUTH2 itself is a standard, I
> think it is (IMO) important tha
it's unclear to me whether XOAUTH2 itself is a standard, I
think it is (IMO) important that mutt somehow develop builtin native
support for OAuth without using the hack of a third party Python script.
Even so, users will likely still need to get the IDs needed to produce
an application (t
On 2024-06-20, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Mi, 19 Jun 2024, Will Yardley wrote:
>
>> (I have started to see some Gmail environments also prevent the
>> creation of app passwords).
>
> If I recall correctly google is transitioning away from using app
> passwords later this year. A quick google
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Mi, 19 Jun 2024, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > (I have started to see some Gmail environments also prevent the
> > creation of app passwords).
>
> If I recall correctly google is transitioning away from using app
> passwords la
On Mi, 19 Jun 2024, Will Yardley wrote:
> (I have started to see some Gmail environments also prevent the
> creation of app passwords).
If I recall correctly google is transitioning away from using app
passwords later this year. A quick google turned up this doc:
https://support.google.com/a/
1 - 100 of 6756 matches
Mail list logo
