On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:10:44AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>On Aug 29, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
>> > you can always try but it has been my experience that these people
>> > don't want to change to anything other than M$. if yo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Though I haven't set that up here yet and just have a local address book
> for most of my contacts, and it works well enough it hasn't bothered me. I
> guess it helps most of the people here have standard-format user names.
This is government. The a
On Aug 30, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
> >
> > Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some
> > scripts that make it push incoming mail out to
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
>
> Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some
> scripts that make it push incoming mail out to a unix box. Exchange can
> only forward, not redirect/bounc
On Aug 29, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> > you can always try but it has been my experience that these people
> > don't want to change to anything other than M$. if your boss is still
> > semi technical this might work; however, if he
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> set attibution="begin 666 quoted text of %boss"
begin followed by two blanks anywhere in the mail body would do, until
termininated by an
end
But what's the point? Bosses define what constitutes brokenness. If he
can't read your email, it's your f
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> you can always try but it has been my experience that these people
> don't want to change to anything other than M$. if your boss is still
> semi technical this might work; however, if he has gone totally over
> to the dark side of management, he
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tell your boss you don't have time for reformatting
> his %$!@# mails because you have *work* to do!
> if he wants you tos end better emails then this
> will take *time* and this has to be *paid* for.
Better yet, the OP should tell him he won't break hi
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 23:49]:
> > then why help him enjoy that you spend your time fixing up
> > your messages to suit the needs of his broken mailer?
> > i mean - does he *pay* you for this kind of work? extra?
> actually, he does; although, he may not know it. :-
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:37:30AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 23:29]:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:21:53AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > if your boss behaves stupid and you play along - does that help?
> > > who will suffer in the end? exa
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 23:29]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:21:53AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > if your boss behaves stupid and you play along - does that help?
> > who will suffer in the end? exactly - both you and your boss.
> depends on your point of view. most
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:21:53AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Sven Guckes wrote:
> > the problem is that M$ does not play according to the rules.
> > it's time to give up compatibility with them and let them
> > feel that they are using bad software. let *them* suffer!
>
> * Peter T. Abplanal
* Sven Guckes wrote:
> the problem is that M$ does not play according to the rules.
> it's time to give up compatibility with them and let them
> feel that they are using bad software. let *them* suffer!
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 23:08]:
> while i agree with your senti
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:55:18AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 17:26]:
> > At work, I use Linux and have been using Mutt and Sylpheed.
> > Yesterday, my boss complained about the format of my e-mails.
> > So to make him happy, I have developed
> > a
* Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 17:26]:
> At work, I use Linux and have been using Mutt and Sylpheed.
> Yesterday, my boss complained about the format of my e-mails.
> So to make him happy, I have developed
> an attribution string that mimics Outlook.
ask him why he is using a ma
On Aug 29, Michael Herman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> At work, I use Linux and have been using Mutt and Sylpheed.
> Yesterday, my boss complained about the format of my e-mails. So to
> make him happy, I have developed an attribution string that mimics
> Outlook.
Yes, I have to do the same. :(
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:25:54PM -0400, Michael Herman wrote:
> How can I tell Mutt not to replace the tabs with > in the pager or as
> I'm replying to e-mails? I would like to use a folder-hook if
> possible.
I don't think mutt's pager is adding those >'s. At least I've never
heard of or se
At work, I use Linux and have been using Mutt and Sylpheed.
Yesterday, my boss complained about the format of my e-mails. So to
make him happy, I have developed an attribution string that mimics
Outlook.
folder-hook $HOME/Mail/Mail-Work/* 'set attribution="\n\n-Original
Message-\nFrom: %
18 matches
Mail list logo
