I can only say, Erik wrote the answer I wanted to write.
@Kevin: The new change sounds very promising. Thank you for that
and all your work!
@Derek: I've read your mails in this thread, and I'm in no way
convinced.
HAND
Nicolas
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:47 -0500]:
> Not only that, but I neglected the fact that if the send fails, the
> file your editor produced in order for it to be passed to Mutt will
> still be on disk, so you do IN FACT still have a copy of the message.
I did just (using my old mutt) set sendmail
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:36 -0500]:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:04:25PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > In the event that send fails, the local copy is essential for a resend
> > attempt. No ifs, no buts, no maybes. I'm at a loss to imagine any
> > scenario in which mutt should risk inab
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:16 -0500]:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:24:11AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Jack M [2019-06-04 10:20 -0500]:
> > > On Tue, June 4, 2019 5:30 am, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > > The other one (mail sent, but no local cop
* Ben Boeckel [2019-06-10 11:56 -0400]:
> If you're this paranoid, the only real fix is to have your editor save a
> backup somewhere before handing it off to mutt in the first place
> anyways. After all, mutt could segfault and lose it before the Fcc!
There is one big difference. If mutt crashes
* Francesco Ariis [2019-06-04 19:52 +0200]:
> Hello Grant,
>
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 04:46:50PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2019-06-04, Jack M wrote:
> >
> > > The reason (or *a* reason) is that the old way led to the following
> > > situation: Fcc first, then try to send, something we
* Jack M [2019-06-04 10:20 -0500]:
> On Tue, June 4, 2019 5:30 am, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > The other one (mail sent, but no local copy)
>
> Why would this situation would ever occur?
A power failure at the wrong moment. A crash at the wrong moment. ...
These things tend to
* "Kevin J. McCarthy" [2019-06-04 09:44 -0700]:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:30:59PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > Does anybody know the reason of this change?
>
> The most recent discussion on mutt-dev was
> <https://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=
Hallo,
I just noted the entry in UPDATING:
! Fcc now occurs after sending a message. If the fcc fails, mutt will prompt
to try again, or to try another mailbox.
This seems to be:
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/commit/e106487b1f4ebe7128982486accec11ac6f54b5c
Does anybody know the reason o
* tj <78...@web.de> [2013-04-22 17:59 -0400]:
> I use fcc_clear to store unencrypted copies of encrypted sent
> messages. Now I would like to add an extra header field to these local
> copies (for later reference), but not to the mail that is being sent
> out. Is this possible with mutt? I could no
* Derek Martin [2013-02-02 11:44 -0600]:
[save-message]
> Now, I will grant you, this feature is a bit schizophrenic. It also
> assumes that once it has done whatever it's going to do, that you no
> longer want the existing copy of the message, and marks it for
> deletion. At which point I have
* Peter Davis [2012-11-20 13:37 -0500]:
> Most workplaces are using email to communicate, and they want maximum
> efficiency in that. Users want a way to get a message across quickly,
> as opposed to trying to create a beautiful and literate archive.
These "efficient" mails usually look this way:
* Rocco Rutte [2009-07-10 13:44 +0200]:
> I don't know if I mentioned this already, but I think I once hacked
> support for read-only variables in mutt-ng that would expose certain
> internal settings.
>
> Would something like this be useful for mutt, too? If yes, doing this
> for one variable onl
* JP Bruns [2009-06-02 10:37 +0200]:
> Is there anything for console-only systems? Mutt is a great piece of
> software, but - in my eyes - is lacking this important feature. Would it be
> possible to take the return-code/-message of the *smtp program and display
> that on the status-line (or th
* Javier Rojas [2009-02-13 21:37 -0500]:
> folder-hook =inbox 'push
> "~(~r>3m)=archivos/inbox~A"'
>
> which uncollapses, archives, and the collapses back the mailbox
>
> This, however, creates another problem: when there is nothing to
> archive, the mailbox ends up uncollapsed.
>
> Any ideas
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-28 14:48 -0500]:
> >I don't remember the difference, if any other than the syntax,
> >off-hand.
>
> The difference is *when* the command gets executed. With "exec", the
> function is executed immediately. With "push", it is executed the next
> time mu
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-22 13:40 +0200]:
> On some mailinglists there occur spam-mails sporadically.
> I thought of (tagging and) deleting them by limiting mutt to show only mails
> which have no response to them. (Nobody replies to spam-mails! ;-> )
>
> Is this possible?
!~(~h in-reply-to)
* Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-30 09:50 -0400]:
> Of course this means rebuilding the full set of bindings. Any
> other ideas? (apart from changing the approach, remember this is
> supposedly theoretical...)
There was at least one discussion about this on mutt-dev. I believe,
there
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-28 16:52 -0500]:
> On Monday, July 28 at 09:29 PM, quoth Michael Kjorling:
> > Something like this:
> >
> > source "gpg -d sensitivestuff.gpg |"
>
> No. That can't work (but we can salvage this idea). First, let me
> explain why it can't work.
>
> Thin
* Marianne Promberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-25 12:17 +0200]:
> However, it turns out that even with such as ...
>
> folder-hook . 'push "~s
> test234s\Ca\Ck=isomerica/archive\n"'
>
> if no message matches "~s test234" it does always save the last
> message to the archive, so this would h
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-16 11:29 -0400]:
> If I hit S to save a message and than want to cancel, or some other
> action that involves two steps...
>
> What is the right way to cancel that
> action?
^G
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-28 10:21 +0100]:
> between those. Can I achieve this without restarting mutt, ie. can I
> empty the currently defined mailboxes ?
Search your local manual(.txt) for unmailboxes.
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.11
This seems to be f
* "Dan H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-28 14:28 +0100]:
Content-Description: kjlkj
???
> 1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read
>it, I get "Could not copy message".
See the thread starting with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]:
> On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml
>
> That looks like a useful patch. Is it headed for main-line inclusion?
Thank you. There hasn't be
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:13 -0700]:
> On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > You can use encrypt-to in your gpg.conf (see man gpg) or add
> > --encrypt-to to all the encryption commands in your mutt configuration.
>
> That seem
* "Dan H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 09:50 +0100]:
> 1. I'd like to have new or unread mail (what's the difference, anyway?)
>flagged somehow. Occasionally I see an N next to some messages, but in
>general mutt seems to completely oblivious to what's new or unreaed.
At least with mai
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-25 22:07 -0700]:
> The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to
> automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding
> public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know that's more complex than
> the usual send-hook entails, bu
* Raphael Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 22:08 +0100]:
> I use the follow hook to tag old messages and save it to a
> archive-folder:
>
> folder-hook =051-Sent-Mail
> 'push~r>12m!~F+052-Sent-Archive'
>
> Now, the problem is, if there's no message to move to this folder
> (becau
[Please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-07 16:11 +0100]:
> I must be mentally retarded, but I tried that one and it didn't work
> for me... I get always the "To:"... ??? Please corroborate mi IQ
I just noted that I don't know a way to avoid the 'To '. I seem to
ig
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 14:15 +0100]:
> and yet I would love to get rid of the "To:" thing... I don't have a
> "From:" in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
> as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
> folder...
Redefine $in
[please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 12:41 +0100]:
> > >I think you mean $simple_search with the default "~f %s | ~s %s".
> >
> > Right! Sorry, my mistake.
>
> In any case, now I have set default_hook="(~f %s !~P) | (~P ~C %s) |
> ~s %s" in my muttrc and stil
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 16:39 -0600]:
> Searching in any index (sent, inbox, whatever) relies on the value of
> $default_hook, which defaults to "~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)".
I think you mean $simple_search with the default "~f %s | ~s %s".
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de
* Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-06 02:47 -0500]:
> Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off
> > depending on emailaddresses:
>
> FWIW, another way I think you can achieve your goal is to use Nicolas
> Rachinsky's crypt-autohook patch[
* Breen Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 19:05 -0700]:
> MAILDIR by itself isn't special in procmail. You usually set it so that
> you can use it in your delivery recipes:
It is special. Quoting procmailrc(5):
MAILDIR Current directory while procmail is executing (that means
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-06 11:08 -0600]:
> On Thursday, September 6 at 09:54 PM, quoth Kumar Appaiah:
> >1. Everything's fine, except that in the pager, if I press backspace,
> >it says key not bound. If I press Ctrl+H, it works as expected.
>
> Okay... all that means is that
* Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-25 20:58 +1000]:
> I read the previous posts and tried in my inbox - press D, use ~= as
> the search pattern, press $ to save. But nothing happens. ~= doesn't
> tag anything and so nothing gets deleted. I am sure I have duplicate
> mails in my inbox as I downlo
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-17 12:48 +0200]:
> One solution would be to bind L to for the git
> mailing list, but a reply-hook is too late for that, and I don't
> have a special folder for git mail.
If you do this bind in a message-hook, it should solve the problem, if
you repl
* tannhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-19 14:35 +0200]:
> the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have the
> gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one key.
I'm not sure, but I think there was a patch to use multiple keyids
with a crypt-hook (or pgp-ho
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-15 23:56 +0300]:
>Is there any way I can make mutt (or another application)
>automatically delete messages in _certain_ folders (such as mailing
>lists) that are over a certain number of days old?
I use folder-hooks to execute
push " ~r>10d\n ~F|~D|~O|~N\n
* Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]:
> folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d "=INBOX.Trash"'
This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX.
> when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL
> folders. Any suggestions?
Add $ at the en
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-28 14:19 -0700]:
> What method of cancelling sending a mail are you using that causes a
> problem with this send-hook?
The default of abort_unmodified could cause this, I think.
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-18 10:39 +0200]:
> On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
>
> > What about
> > source `colorset.sh`
>
> Where is colorset.sh available?
Write your own. Something like:
#!/bin/sh
if condition; then
echo co
* John Haviland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-18 03:04 +1000]:
> I am using mutt (another newbie) as a sub-set of another process, i.e
> unattended. The mutt section is intended to go into a mailbox and save mail
> that matches a subject pattern, delete that mail and then quit
> automatically. This
* Christoph Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-17 01:16 +0200]:
> I took the macro from Alain some threads before, to fetch mail by one
> keypress.
> Like this:
> macro index "" "!fetchmail &\r"
> macro pager "" "!fetchmail &\r"
> macro browser "" "!fetchmail &\r"
>
> Is there a way to get rid of
* Jose Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-15 13:42 -0200]:
> Is it possible to specify more than one set of colors
> to be used by mutt? The color sets would be
> selected according to the terminal colors. This way
> I could use an appropriate set of colors with a
> light backgound ter
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 23:43 +0200]:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote:
> > Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the
> > abbreviation for "the current folder" can help:
> >
> > fcc-save-hook . ^
> >
> Pardon my non-understanding, but searchin
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 18:04 +0200]:
> On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
>
> > hostname = `hostname`
> > Is it what you want ?
>
> No. I want something like this:
>
> if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
> set hostname=host2
> fi
>
> It should also affect
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 00:08 +0200]:
> is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
> I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
> hostname.
What about "set hostname=`hostname`"?
Nicolas
* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27 03:15 +1000]:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
>
>
* Robert Lillack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:11 +0200]:
> since I have a lot of mailboxes i wanted to see only those
> containing new mail while in the browser view. Because I use
> MH folders all needed is just a really simple shell script:
>
> for i in `flist -all -recurse -noshowz
* jochen issing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:44 +0200]:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > * jochen issing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 16:25]:
> > > > after my recent update to 1.4i, I am not able able to remove any mails
> > > > out of my spool files. I c
* Rob Lingelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-23 22:21 -0700]:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > but there was a patch which allowed to
> > add a comment in an extra header line.
> > maybe this can solve your problem...
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt
> thank you Sven. it might,
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 18:57 +0200]:
> That's exactly what I am looking for... Currently I use:
>
> macro index \ch ";~P\n;T~A\n;~a\n;^T~A\n" \
> "show my threads" #^^
I'm really fascinated what's possible with mutt. I never used the
co
* Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
[...]
> I can't find a way to force not to move, nor can I find a way to
> get "back to where I was," taking into account the move that may result from
> .
>
> Is there a solution other than hacking the source?
Yes.
>From the fine m
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-18 22:11 +0200]:
> i'd like to delete all threads that consist of messages which are older
> than 2 months. i thought of something like this
>
> D~r >2m
> T~r !~D
> ;^U
>
> but ^U does not work with tag-prefix. any ideas?
Perhaps does the following patch what you wa
* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-13 00:26 +0200]:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 23:47:23 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > I use the attached patch (with "mark_old is unset"). But I must admit,
> > I use it only with local Maildirs.
>
> What
* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 22:31 +0200]:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> >
> > Vincent Lefevre said:
> > > I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading):
> > > 1) Messages that mustn't be deleted.
> > > 2) Messag
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 17:23 +0200]:
> * Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"|
> > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/"|
>
> * Sven Guckes wrote:
> > source filename
> > source fil
* Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-08 19:29 -0400]:
> Now all mutt needs is for f to be able to pick from the
> alternates list. But this is very minor.
I use:
alias f_listNicolas Rachinsky
alias f_ Nicolas Rachinsky
alias f_dauerreden Nicolas Rachi
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 17:03 -0400]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
> >
> > The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> > either.
>
> Really? I didn't know what
* Eric Blau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-17 11:16 -0400]:
> I am having a problem getting a folder-hook working properly. I have
> the following folder-hook in my muttrc file:
>
> folder-hook =INBOX 'push T~r>1m\n\;s=archive/INBOX\n'
>
> I want mutt to automatically move mail older than 1 month
* David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 21:10 +0200]:
> Well, my documentation (did I mention it was version 1.3.28i) of
> the %L variable says, if I can copy it correctly (because I've
> never found out how to combine "r" and "-i"):
>
> If an address to the To or CC heade
* David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 17:52 +0200]:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Mat Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 14:58 +0100]:
> > Look for index_format. I think you want to replace %L with %F.
>
* Mat Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 14:58 +0100]:
> me too please. this is really annoying me.
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:56:37 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > When is set "subscribe" for a mailing list, mutt lists
> > mail received from this list with something like
> >
> > t
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 14:39 +0200]:
> I remember to have a read about about a patch making the
> indicator bar always exactly the same color as specified.
> The problem is that if the color of the message in the index
> is ``bright...'', the foreground color of the bar gets
* Melvin Q Watchpocket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-03 18:45 -0400]:
> On Sat 08/03/02 at 09:30 PM +0200,
> But if you use the MTA (sendmail in this case, and in many cases)
> to create an envelope header that's gonna be different from a
> message's "From:" header, (by doing 'sendmail -f'), then i
* Melvin Q Watchpocket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-03 08:20 -0400]:
> On Sat 08/03/02 at 12:50 PM +0200,
> Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-03 04:28 -0400]:
> > > Can mutt set the envelope t
* Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-03 04:28 -0400]:
> Can mutt set the envelope to the user's choice *at the time of
> message compose* to an address different from the message's
> "From:" address?
Yes, of course!
> How is it done? For starters, I'd probably want to:
unset envelope_from
then
* Patrik Modesto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-02 12:09 +0200]:
> Maybe this is stupid question but I searched man-page to muttrc and find
> nothing about it. So, I need to forward message that contains some
> attachments. But I need to edit/update the text part of the forwarded
> message. What I'v
[please use the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this ML]
* Sven Garbade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 10:59 +]:
> I'm new to mutt and have two little questions. How can I turn off th
> e bell? Is it possible to clear the screen from mails which are marked as deleted?
grep the manual for beep
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-26 11:22 -0700]:
> I've been noticing I get some messages where the subject begins with
> =?US-ASCII?Q??=. I looked this up on google (took some time
Can you send us the whole string? =?US-ASCII?Q??=
Nicolas
* Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 13:33 +0200]:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]:
> > > % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too.
> >
it's a new message and so
> it should get a new Message-ID: and so it changes.
The MID header is left unchanged, mutt adds:
Resent-From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:08:43 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: Nicolas R
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-14 13:19 -0500]:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 01:55:15PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> | * Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 06:02:40 +0200] wrote:
> | > On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 10:08:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> |
> | > | Hmmm... Perhaps I've misu
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-09 16:10 -0500]:
> * On 2002.07.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Rocco Rutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Any chance that somebody can place a compressed archive in
> > correct mbox format somewhere on the web (I would, but I
> > have too l
* Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-08 11:27 -0700]:
>
> I'm puzzled... Doing a,
>
> :set ?record
>
> in mutt, displays,
>
> record="/home/deb/Mail/.record"
>
What's the output of ":set ?copy" ?
Nicolas
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-06 10:34 +0200]:
> I am having a problem setting variables whose contents should contain (one
> or more) spaces. I don't know if it is something I am doing wrong or what is
> going on. Here is an example:
> folder-hook mutt set from="Gary Jones "
Use
folder-hook mutt
* Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-03 22:37 -0700]:
> * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
>
> > set sort=subject
> > set sort=threads# sorting the mails in threads
> > set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
> >
> > ... that works for me
>
> Nope, didn't work.
* Raoul Bönisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-01 21:46 +0200]:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:39:55AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Aragon Gouveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-30 23:38 +0200]:
> > > Does anyone know how to have Mutt display a 'U'
* Aragon Gouveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-01 05:31 +0200]:
> | By Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | [ 2002-07-01 01:41 +0200 ]
> >
> > This would be very expensive when using mbox folders, because mutt
>
* Aragon Gouveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-30 23:38 +0200]:
> Does anyone know how to have Mutt display a 'U' flag in the folder view if a
> mail folder has unread messages? There's no folder_format format string for
> it, so I was hoping someone could help me add it to the source. I really suc
* "Lee J. Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-30 19:13 +0100]:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
>
> > Alas! Lee J. Moore spake thus:
> [..]
> > > `~/bin/maildir-count ~/Maildir/%f`
> > >
> > > ...it's actually, ~/Maildir/%f and *not* ~/Maildir/submaildir
> > > that's being passed
* Qingjia Zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-01 01:57 +0800]:
> Ah, I usualy have lots of mailboxes, I'll have trouble to remember
> which mailbox contains unread mails, so maybe a feature request to be
> considered:
>
> 6.3.49. folder_format
> Type: string
> Default: "%2C %t %N %F %2l
Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead.
* Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 23:29 +0530]:
> I have defined a folder-hook as:
> folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash"
>
> But the error coming is 'push too many arguments'
try
folder-hook !Trash "pus
* Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 09:44 +0100]:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > It's encoded with quoted-printable, AFAIK quoted-printable requires
> > the sender to a maximal line length of (I think) 100 bytes, after
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-21 10:02 -0500]:
> ...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
> % push
>"~r>10d\n~F|~D|~O|~N\n!~a\n\n\n"
> %
> % It's a bit slow with folders containing almost 1000 messages on my K6
> % so I have a small shellscr
* Benoit Friry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-21 10:26 +0200]:
>
> Hi! :)
>
> John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said :
> > * On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Dean Richard Benson wrote:
>
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I have setup a folder which holds any suspected spam (thanks
> > > spamassassin+razor). However
Hallo,
does anybody know how/where to get patch-1.3.26.dw.pgp-hook.3 for
mutt-1.5.1. I seem to be unable to reach Dale Woolridge.
Thanks
Nicolas
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-11 22:59 +0200]:
> I was just wondering if there is some configuration in mutt that makes it possible
>for you to reply to a message without actually "modifying" the original message (used
>when confirming mailinglists subscriptions), all I get now i
* AxUm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-11 02:02 -0500]:
> Humm, even with that the from in a send hooks only takes effect if
> I start a message twice, realname takes the first time.
>
> set use_from
> set envelope_from
>
> send-hook x \
> 'set realname="&tc"; set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"'
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-10 11:40 -0400]:
> I tried this:
>
> macro compose 3 "^Umy_alias^M; \
> ^Uother_addr^M " "Set From to my_alias"
Why is there a ';', I don't think you need it. Try it without the ';'
and remove all unneccessary whitespace (the leading i
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-10 11:40 -0400]:
> Well,
>
> > macro index $somekey \
> > "set var1; \
> > set var 2; \
> > set var 3"
>
> I tried this:
>
> macro compose 3 "^Umy_alias^M; \
> ^Uother_addr^M " "Set From to my_alias"
I would try it without the l
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-06 13:28 -0700]:
> you can use a macro (see the archives) to bind 'd' to save messages to a
> folder, or better, you can apply cedric duval's excellent trash folder
> patch.
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/
> > 2. When I'm in the index mode with all m
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-06 09:22 +0200]:
> * John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 23:22]:
> > I note that if I resend a message from, say, my outbox by
> > doing ESC e to open it, edit and send the new message, no copy
> > of the newly edited and sent message is placed i
* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 22:39 +0200]:
> can I define a default folder for saving attachments (something like
> /home/me/download) in the .muttrc?
macro attach s '~/I/' 'save attachment'
Nicolas
; you can do it with a mapping like these:
>
> map #F1 1G/^From: /e+1CMike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> map #F2 1G/^From: /e+1CMike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I use the following to set the From address:
macro compose v "^Uf_" "Absender wählen"
alias f_de Nicolas Rachinsky
alias f_net Nicolas Rachinsky
Nicolas
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 17:32 -0700]:
> Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
> are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
> messages are via set record=?
There was a bug. It now works fine (sorry, don't know exact
* Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-31 23:48:21 -0400]:
> I recently switched my workstation from RedHat 7.1 to SuSE 7.3, and
> now I'm having a funny problem when I compose mail. Mutt is no longer
> asking me for a recipient or CC address when I hit 'm' to compose mail
> (ask for CC i
* Fernando Schapachnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-31 15:47:51 -0300]:
> I should have been more specific. There is a mailing list, so I'd
> like mutt to either manually or automatically let me encrypt to
> non-recipients (not me, the other fix, small set of people that
> comprise the list). What
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-27 22:37:07 +0200]:
> * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-25 08:27]:
> > Do you really think the time is usefull without a timezone?
> no timezone given -> GMT!
> talk about defaults here..
But you'
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
